Fucking morons. At no point in this video do they show the laser hitting the land. There are only people on the other side saying "I can see it" - so fucking what? You can clearly see the light is far above their heads.
These people wasted $20,000 so they could circle jerk.
That may be sufficient enough to invalidate the experiment but I don't care to sit down and do the math. I've done these types of experiments myself in school and can verify that the footage is either doctored or there are unaccounted for variables skewing their results.
Doing it across water with "I can see teh light!1" being the only criteria for success is shitty science because of refraction. Spectrometry isn't my field, but I know someone well versed in it.
Also, they have no link to a document with their findings that I saw. Maybe I overlooked it. But they don't seem to want anyone to really sit down and analyze their data. The hard figures are constantly moving on screen.
Well what do you sad imbeciles have to counter it?.. always dodging and beating around the bush.
To make things simple.. Go buy yourself a 10k+++ Laser gyroscope and smash your flat forehead in after you realize you wasted $$$ and come to the conclusion that the earth roughly rotates 15 degrees per hour.
This would get you laughed out of the room in any scholarly situation. Virtually no scholar, atheist or otherwise, agrees with this. Not even Ehrman.
broken telephone
More ignorance. Textual criticism is nothing like the telephone game. The synoptics in particular are dated to the same generation in which Jesus lived. Mark in particular is virtually certainly not written later than thirty years after Jesus. Probably much, much sooner. There's actually a good case for seven years.
We have more textual references to the New Testiment than to any other ancient work and it's not even remotely close. Something like 500k+ textual artifacts. And that's not counting references included in early church letters. You'd be more likely to be correct saying Alexander the Great never existed. The first textual reference we have for him is Quintus Curtius Rufus 400 years after Alexander died.
Yes Jesus almost certainly existed. The view that he didn't is very very fringe among historians. Of the few that assert that he never existed (the mythicists), I've read some of their stuff and am simply not convinced.
The real debate surrounds what Jesus actually said and did. That makes for fun investigation.
He kicked the "money changers" out of the church. Compare that with any jewish temple. And how are jews "his disciples"? Aren't the followers of christ's called.... Christians?
This is CGI. Not a real situation. You can use that to impress in the Kindergarten, I am afraid.
The position of the observer is not where the "camera lens" is, so the observer is out in space and not on Earth.
This might be the dumbest picture I have seen.
Lol. Wow. Nasa should hire you, you proved it wrong when none of their million dollar scientists could!
The one time Einstein had an idea that worked.
Did he have any original thought? The guy is a joke.
Yes. NASA landed on it in a tin foil machine.
“Unfortunately the education system has failed them”
You mean the indoctrination system ? FOH
bro I admitted I was wrong xD
This is still a flat earth thread, though
It was flat for millions of years years intill NASA said it wasn't. Makes you think.
Is it? Probably it is.
If by NASA, you mean Pythagoras then sure.
Fake and gay
Fucking morons. At no point in this video do they show the laser hitting the land. There are only people on the other side saying "I can see it" - so fucking what? You can clearly see the light is far above their heads.
These people wasted $20,000 so they could circle jerk.
Check and verify the theory. This is what real scientists do.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsSanuUNygI
I am only convinced that NASA is lying. I want more science on the topic, not high school brainwashing stories without any proofs.
Well, at first blush they seem to be lying about the elevation differences between origination point and collection point.
That may be sufficient enough to invalidate the experiment but I don't care to sit down and do the math. I've done these types of experiments myself in school and can verify that the footage is either doctored or there are unaccounted for variables skewing their results.
Doing it across water with "I can see teh light!1" being the only criteria for success is shitty science because of refraction. Spectrometry isn't my field, but I know someone well versed in it.
Also, they have no link to a document with their findings that I saw. Maybe I overlooked it. But they don't seem to want anyone to really sit down and analyze their data. The hard figures are constantly moving on screen.
This is almost certainly junk science.
THANK YOU
Skip to 45 minutes in, shills
98% of the target hidden height is visible at 28 kms
Not a globe.
It's not a globe. This place is shill'd all to hell have no worries
Yikes...
This is a proof?
Well what do you sad imbeciles have to counter it?.. always dodging and beating around the bush.
To make things simple.. Go buy yourself a 10k+++ Laser gyroscope and smash your flat forehead in after you realize you wasted $$$ and come to the conclusion that the earth roughly rotates 15 degrees per hour.
You realize that 15 degrees works with the flat earth too? They believe in a firmament that rotates
Anyone who believes in firmaments is low IQ with a mentality stuck in 1475.
Jesus is the truth, the sooner you accept that the better. All the tv ever done for you is lie.
Jesus never existed.. fake fairytales passed down like broken telephone.... Flat earth would be more believable.. yet is bs as well.
This would get you laughed out of the room in any scholarly situation. Virtually no scholar, atheist or otherwise, agrees with this. Not even Ehrman.
More ignorance. Textual criticism is nothing like the telephone game. The synoptics in particular are dated to the same generation in which Jesus lived. Mark in particular is virtually certainly not written later than thirty years after Jesus. Probably much, much sooner. There's actually a good case for seven years.
We have more textual references to the New Testiment than to any other ancient work and it's not even remotely close. Something like 500k+ textual artifacts. And that's not counting references included in early church letters. You'd be more likely to be correct saying Alexander the Great never existed. The first textual reference we have for him is Quintus Curtius Rufus 400 years after Alexander died.
At least make an effort to be informed.
Yes Jesus almost certainly existed. The view that he didn't is very very fringe among historians. Of the few that assert that he never existed (the mythicists), I've read some of their stuff and am simply not convinced.
The real debate surrounds what Jesus actually said and did. That makes for fun investigation.
This guy is a jew. Don't listen. To jews talk about Jesus. Jesus wasn't a fan of feminine men or thieves so that why he hated the jews
So he hated his own disciples, and himself?
I don't really recall Jesus hating anyone in the Gospels.
He kicked the "money changers" out of the church. Compare that with any jewish temple. And how are jews "his disciples"? Aren't the followers of christ's called.... Christians?
A laset gyroscope requires a round earth to function.
But by all means, please propose a model and a mechanism that allows it to function on a flat earth.
Seriously, it's like the concept of "challenging the belief system" needs to be spelled out here, but this is conspiracy.
I thought that was the point. Not to call something a psy-op because you can't explain it yourself.
Jesus Christ people.
Ok, faggot. Challenge it then instead of pretending to be a victim.
And this contributes how exactly...?
What is with all of these homophobic 4chan comments?
Says the flat earth faggot
You’re too stupid to be here.
Yikes sweaty you didn't source well enough. Check out my png meme that's very trustworthy.
Literally commit suicide. All of your posts will be perpetually reported as spam.
Reported for violence
Fuck off, sockpuppet. Adults are talking.
Well little foul mouthed child, when I see an adult talking I will respond to them
This is CGI. Not a real situation. You can use that to impress in the Kindergarten, I am afraid. The position of the observer is not where the "camera lens" is, so the observer is out in space and not on Earth.
Trust him, they are.
They can demonstrate this effect with a simple experiment. A strong light, a basketball and a tennis ball in a dark room.
Take a flashlight on a beach and shove it up you ass. Can you see the light? Boom, checkmate roundies!
I guess they do not teach the chinese army trolls proper English any more.
That would be YOUR... not YOU.
Not at flashlight school, they dont
Well, apparently OP doesn’t know the difference between what causes the normal cycles of the moon vs an eclipse.