9
GodAndGlory 9 points ago +9 / -0

I'm a "healthcare worker" who also took out big debt to buy my dream business in California

I've been living a lie everyday, because I'd lose half my revenue if people knew. Now with this Newsom "vaccine or weekly test" mandate, I think I'm done. Need to sell and get out before I dig myself into an even bigger hole.

I fucking did everything right, followed the cookbook and played the game, only for my freedom and pursuit of happiness to be stolen from me. Fuck California. Good luck dude

2
GodAndGlory 2 points ago +2 / -0
  1. Sure. Get a non-metal crown.
  2. Sure. Get white fillings instead.
  3. Root Canals. Bacteria from cavities will transverse the nerve and infect the bone. Bone will literally heal after the root canal is completed (not always, sometimes leaves a scar like you said). Are you saying it is better to extract teeth rather than get a root canal? If you extract teeth, other teeth tilt, move, supraerupt, etc then you end up with a terrible bite which can lead to more lateral forces, pain, and tooth loss.
  4. What do you mean "don't exist to mainstream dentists"? Dentists are all trained to remove infected tissue after extraction. But, it can be difficult or complex, in which oral surgeons would handle.
  5. "Infection and bone loss around implants is so common they invented a new world for it, periimplantitis". Of course they invented a new word, implants are new. I don't get what you're saying about ligaments of the tooth. Because people still get infections around teeth, a ligament doesn't stop many, many infections of teeth

I will say, of course, treat the cause not the disease. Alkalize your body/mouth. Coconut oil. Brush/floss/mouthrinse. Can use calcium / phosphate toothpastes like MI paste, be aware of how loaded everything is with sugar, etc.

But once you get decay in the bone your tooth, I feel it should be a case-by-case basis to recommend just extracting the tooth, vs getting a root canal or implant.

1
GodAndGlory 1 point ago +1 / -0

Brother, your examples will happen on a flat and globe earth model. You're arguing with what you "see", without understanding a basic principles of distance, that as something gets further and further away it merges into the horizon (in our 2D field of view)

  1. Just because something "visibly" does something doesn't mean that it does. As things get further and further away, all things converge towards the horizon, until our eyes cannot see anymore. Look down a long street, the tops of houses will converge into the horizon, as well as the bases of lamp posts.

Pro-Tip: A powerful telescope would bring those houses back into view, even the ones that should be hidden by the "curvature of the earth".

  1. Again time zones work in a flat earth model. The sun is just at a location where it is now closer to your friend than you.
4
GodAndGlory 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hey mate, you haven't researched the flat earth model because they definitely have an explanation.

The sun moves in a circle around the north pole. For sunsets it is disappearing from our vision (optical horizon, atmosphere blockage, etc)

Their rebuttal question would be: Why are there so many videos where the sun gets smaller as it sets? Is that possible on a globe?

1
GodAndGlory 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dk where I stand.

But they don't say the firmament is a hard shell. They suspect it's more a field of charged particles (the Van Allen radiation belt). Possibly in relation to earth's magnetic torus field.

Side note: every person has a small magnetic field around them, a torus field. That's why we have a torso. Some people can see this, it's what creates our aura. The earth has its own magnetic field as well, hence why it has its auroras

5
GodAndGlory 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's why I have gold and silver too tbh

1
GodAndGlory 1 point ago +1 / -0

Page and/or text?

I control+F'ed "virus" and "sample" and didn't think I found that there were no virus samples (This stuff is confusing to read lol)