by pkvi
-6
xolotltlaloc -6 points ago +1 / -7

I "smell" nothing.

What's your point?

Are you one of those people who believes "cash" is safer / more valuable/stable than crypto?

7
xolotltlaloc 7 points ago +7 / -0

this canadian dr. claims us military and news from thailand showing 10% - 20% rate of myocarditis in the vaccinated !!

https://twitter.com/CShoemakerMD/status/1684176016405843971

50% die within 5 years of myocardial injury.

quick numbers:

Overall, 230,637,348 people or 70% of the population (USA) are considered fully vaccinated.

Assuming low-end 10% of 230 million = 23 million.

i.e., roughly 10 million americans will die from heart attacks over the next 3 years.


edit/ps. further context:

normally there are 1 million heart attacks per year in the USA (since 1980)

so...now expect 13 million over the next 3 years

i.e., 1 mill per year = normal over 3 years in 3 million + 10million expected from myocardial injury over the next 3 years.

3
xolotltlaloc 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thats one in 35....so far...

correct

this canadian dr. claims suggests us military and news from thailand showing 10% - 20% !!

https://twitter.com/CShoemakerMD/status/1684176016405843971

50% die within 5 years of myocardial injury.

quick numbers:

Overall, 230,637,348 people or 70% of the population (USA) are considered fully vaccinated.

Assuming low-end 10% of 230 million = 23 million.

i.e., roughly 10 million americans will die from heart attacks over the next 3 years.


edit/ps. further context:

normally there are 1 million heart attacks per year in the USA (since 1980)

so...now expect 13 million over the next 3 years

i.e., 1 mill per year = normal over 3 years in 3 million + 10million expected from myocardial injury over the next 3 years.

3
xolotltlaloc 3 points ago +3 / -0

autistic savant

she's the speech writer - probably has a photographic memory.

2
xolotltlaloc 2 points ago +2 / -0

Again?!

Why so many Bills condemning anti-semitism?


Here is an INCOMPLETE list of bills passed condemning anti-semitism:

  1. H.Res.35: Condemning the violence, persecution, intimidation, and murders committed by the governments of Russia and Chechnya against its LGBTI population and its religious and ethnic minorities, including Jewish individuals.

  2. H.Res.354: Condemning the shooting at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in October 2018, and expressing support and prayers for all those affected by the tragedy.

  3. H.Res.86: Condemning the rise of antisemitism in the United States and around the world and reaffirming the need to combat hatred, bigotry, and violence against all minorities.

  4. S.Res.71: A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the rise of antisemitism in Europe and urging European nations to enact laws to protect Jewish communities.

  5. H.R.6725: Combating Global Anti-Semitism Act of 2020 - A bill to require the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism to hold the governments of foreign countries accountable for acts of antisemitism and for other purposes.

  6. H.Res.183: Condemning the global rise of antisemitism and urging countries to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism.

  7. S.Res.185: A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the rise of antisemitism in the United States and around the world.

  8. H.Res.1216: Condemning acts of antisemitism and hate towards Jews and Jewish institutions.

  9. H.Res.496: Condemning antisemitic attacks and incidents as well as supporting security for Jewish communities.

  10. H.Res.3722: Condemning antisemitism in all forms and promoting educational efforts to teach about the Holocaust.


You'd think one would be sufficient.

What am I missing?

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

you got me there, ace! ;)

by pkvi
0
xolotltlaloc 0 points ago +1 / -1

terrestrial is vastly superior, more efficient, more cost effective, etc

none of what you said it true, let's be honest

by pkvi
1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

And it was demonstrated that it is not reliable

technology improves

by pkvi
0
xolotltlaloc 0 points ago +1 / -1

The study team has already begun speaking to SpaceX about how the company can help mitigate the problem in the future, and so far, talks have progressed positively, researchers wrote in the statement. However, many other private companies also will need to consider the issue, they added. The teams are calling for new regulations that will bring space-based radio emissions in line with terrestrial ones.

OK so something is being done about it. Good.

ps. that image used in the article was not an actual photo - just an artist's illustration

by pkvi
1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

The question isn't really is it going to happen.

Technological advancement will lead to a global a satellite network.

Inevitable.

The question is who will control it?

I believe Elon owns the material asset, but I believe the deep state will always own your shit in practice ...if you want to stay alive.

basically.

so yes, elon is pressured - obviously - by the ever-death-threat of the CIA.

i.e., the CIA controls it - otherwise it would have never allowed elon to launch them in the first-place. in return, the US/CIA gains control of the first global satellite network. that's kind of a big deal, from a national security perspective - i.e., you want to be the nation that has that asset vs. the nations that do not. safe to say.

satellites don't kill people. people kill people.

I agree with elon:

  • we need to become an inter planetary species;

  • end the war in ukraine to save lives today.

  • starlink is here to stay. if you don't use it, they will.

0
xolotltlaloc 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ok, you win,

yup

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

oh yea that water pooled in the drain looks so fresh mmmm delicious.

by DrLeaks
3
xolotltlaloc 3 points ago +3 / -0

not disney.

it's mike judge (bevis and butthead) ... looks pretty good actually.

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

use your common sense.

lol... are you joking?

that water is a puddle. not a neglected swimming pool or a pond.

yea a puddle of neglected skanky water.

it's CLLLLLLLEAAAAAARLY mosquito larvae

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ya, i looked closer. Thats not larve

yea, look even closer... that IS larve :)

by pkvi
0
xolotltlaloc 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hutchison effect is interesting; however, does not explain "metallurgical anomalies" - has nothing to do with 9/11.

by pkvi
1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anything good for 'national security' is ultimately a direct threat to freedom.

yes and also enables freedom.

e.g., boarder walls - when used correctly - protect from foreign threats.

national security is a necessary evil - like courts of law - double edged swords in seek of balance.

just imagine if there were not courts, we would be free to murder ours enemies (or be murdered) w/o consequence! yay freedom!

by pkvi
1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you made reusable rockets, I guarantee we would be paying for everything you did too.

Do you understand how strategically important reusable rockets (not to mention "satellite to handset" real-time communications) are to national security.

2
xolotltlaloc 2 points ago +2 / -0

kinda cool.

kinda creepy.

5
xolotltlaloc 5 points ago +5 / -0

hahaha... i don't believe that was intended as a compliment.

i assume that was a kind way to say "stupid"

i.e., stupid to take money from CIA to fight Putin on behalf of the zionists - good luck staying alive.

2
xolotltlaloc 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can also bypass Twitter's restrictions by using TOR

What twitter restrictions can be bypassed by TOR?

#curious

by pkvi
1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +2 / -1

judy wood is a CIA limited hangout.

she dismisses nuclear demolition as if it was a joke, but "space DEWs are real!"

lol, whatever, cunt.

Occam's razor comes to mind.

9/11 was a nuclear event.

by pkvi
2
xolotltlaloc 2 points ago +4 / -2

planes smash into building.

nothing happens for an hour.

collapses into own footprint at freefall.

(nuclear demolition)

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›