5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +5 / -0

They aren't really around anymore for comparison...

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +5 / -1

Women need to understand that they make for shitty men. They look down on being "just" a sex object, when 99% of men couldn't be sex objects no matter how hard they tried. But, if humans became gender neutral, I wouldn't be friends with anyone who acted like 99% of women do. We *put up with their shittiness" because they offer what we can't get for ourselves.

Men explore, settle, build, and maintain everything; women convince men it's worth the effort to do so. Both are important, but they are not equal.

0
WeedleTLiar 0 points ago +2 / -2

feminine trans females

Pretty sure they all joined MAGA...

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is no perfect system; corrupt people in positions of power can corrupt a good system just as easily as a bad one.

Those considering enriching themselves at the expense of the state need to be too afraid of the consequences to ever go through with it.

5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hmm, kinda like how the vaxxed have a higher chance of getting Covid?

This happens with the Meningitis shots as well. In that case they target specific strains, which they generally prevent, but the chance of catching other strains goes up by so much that you're statistically better off mot getting it.

I wonder if it's a flaw in the very principal of vaccination; maybe exposing people to strains of viruses "locks in" the immune system, causing it to ignore similar strains? Or the bodies resources for identifying threats are depleted?

Not sure, but this phemonenon seems to crop up with pretty much every jab I look into, which means the medical community must be well aware.

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

How does that increase the risk? If that's what's happening there should be no difference between jabbed and unjabbed groups.

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

The way you can tell this is true is that they won't actually hold anyone to account for any of it, much less recover any money.

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

In clown world, comedians are the only source of reliable news.

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

political science major

Opinion discarded

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +4 / -3

No, this is a false equivalence.

There was never anything virtuous about being "tolerant"; it was always just cowardice cloaked in moral superiority. When I say "Yes, I am racist", that's not rhetorical; it's an acknowledgement of reality.

We should care about kids, however. If doesn't even matter whether you have your own or not; everyone needs kids to be raised well enough that they can take the reigns of civilization from us when we're too old. Anyone who doesn't understsnd this, or who doesn't care about the future of our species, is a self-centered nihilist who doesn't deserve any credibility.

The correct response is, and always is: The safety of the children is the responsibility of the parent.

The only laws that should even be considered in "protecting" children are those which increase the ability of their parents to protect them (explicit authority relating to schooling/healthcare, strong gun ownership rights, Castle doctrine applying to children, etc).

Governments do not protect children, governments cover up actual child abuse.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +3 / -1

Lions also let their old die; humans preserve wisdom and knowledge by instilling it into children.

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have never lost access to any account due to someone guessing my password.

I have lost access to e-mail after losing my phone.

This practice is a security vulnerability.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

This.

Wokeness wasn't even a concept.

Yes, it was. Tolerance and diversity were still pushed as "virtues" while "racism" was vilified. Boys were taught that every time they succeeded, they were taking opportunities away from girls. Kids struggling with identity were told "Be Yourself". Every show and movie had this or that token character to show how "progressive" they were.

It was all there but at "tolerable",Liberal levels and everyone though it would just stay like that, not realizing that they were inside a process.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do not; does anyone have context?

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +5 / -1

Everytime I inadvertantly agree with you, I feel the need to reconsider my position...

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +7 / -3

Lol

I've lived around immigrants for more than 20 years, the top 1% of dozens of races; no they aren't.

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +6 / -2

Anything that can be framed as "protecting children" (even if it obviously doesn't) fills her panties full of sand.

5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +6 / -1

Mmmhmmm. Is this like the time you posted "TEXAS BLOCKS INTERNET TO ANYONE WITHOUT DIGITAL ID" but it turns out they don't actually have an ID system in place and the law is totally unenforceable?

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

When everything that Jews believe is written in their holy books, and explans not only all of their behaviour but the growing evil across the world, I don't need to bring reptilians into it.

6
WeedleTLiar 6 points ago +6 / -0

The phrase "We hide information that could scare people away from making the decision we want" should be cast in bronze and displayed prominently in front of every building with anything to do with government "health" services.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›