There was a tree with no fruit when there should have been buddings of first fruits
It literally says that there were no figs because it wasn't the season for it. How do you know that there should have been buddings and even if there had been, they would not be edible.
God told the tree it would never bear fruit again and then it didn't.
No, that's NOT what he said. He said nobody will eat fruit from it again. You are again reinterpreting what is actually written down.
You can't write one single post without making shit up.
Your interpretation.
The bible presents this as a real event that really happened. It provides no explanation about some allegorical meaning.
Therefore, any attempt to insert meaning into the story is just you making shit up.
You won't send a link because no link exists that shows evidence for your retarded claims.
You are just like every other flath earther. At best you'll post some bullshit youtube video.
You have not the slightest idea how science works which is why you are easily fooled by grifters and scammers.
Pathetic.
there are tests that people have conducted
Show
The
Data
You really don't understand what I am asking, do you?
Just show the experiment with the lasers. Do it.
You won't because you have no idea what you are talking about.
Withering is not mentioned anywhere. You are just making shit up.
Why would God curse tree without fruit? Why would he be surprised that there s no fruit when it's not the season for fruit AND he's all-knowing anyway?
For a normal human, that would be stupid behavior, for a god, it's just insane.
The text says nothing about the tree withering. You just made that up.
The text specifically says that there were no figs because it wasn't the season for it. Not because it was barren. It becomes barren after God curses it.
So again, you made that up.
The Russkie shills all fucked off when Putin failed to conquer Ukraine after two years.