So we take out the human application; There was a tree with no fruit when there should have been buddings of first fruits, so because there weren't any, God told the tree it would never bear fruit again and then it didn't.
There was a tree with no fruit when there should have been buddings of first fruits
It literally says that there were no figs because it wasn't the season for it. How do you know that there should have been buddings and even if there had been, they would not be edible.
God told the tree it would never bear fruit again and then it didn't.
No, that's NOT what he said. He said nobody will eat fruit from it again. You are again reinterpreting what is actually written down.
You can't write one single post without making shit up.
Thanks for proving my point.
As soon as someone points out the insanity of your god's actions, it's a "parable" or "allegory" or "symbolic".
What did I make up? You seem upset for no reason.
Your interpretation.
The bible presents this as a real event that really happened. It provides no explanation about some allegorical meaning.
Therefore, any attempt to insert meaning into the story is just you making shit up.
So we take out the human application; There was a tree with no fruit when there should have been buddings of first fruits, so because there weren't any, God told the tree it would never bear fruit again and then it didn't.
It literally says that there were no figs because it wasn't the season for it. How do you know that there should have been buddings and even if there had been, they would not be edible.
No, that's NOT what he said. He said nobody will eat fruit from it again. You are again reinterpreting what is actually written down.
You can't write one single post without making shit up.