3
SwampRangers 3 points ago +3 / -0

The parasites are the Swamp Creatures that we are targeting and removing from the swamp. I see that elementary-level marketing didn't work for you. You also think I have something to hide but the back office is laughing around the clock at your shenanigans and not getting in the way of your self-destruction. I am one of the rangers tasked with spreading the message of Christianity and good government to various media, and I ended up focusing on Scored because of its compatibility with our message. There's nothing in my profile or in our organization that is about infiltration or that evidences that in any way; in fact I ensured I had mod and admin approval before beginning to post here so that I could mention the Swamp Rangers org on rare occasions when called for without being considered self-promoting.

4
SwampRangers 4 points ago +4 / -0

Since 2021-01-01 Swamp Rangers is a confederation of individuals who are monitoring the swamp and working for the removal of swamp creatures from having power. I'm just one of the more vocal ones.

I have no association with anyone else on Conspiracies. I'm not trolling, my content is positive, as you acknowledged earlier this month with your effusive praise of me. You turned on at least one other user who, like me, pointed out he was here much longer than you and who has the community's interests at heart, and who doesn't make what the last mod called bullying meta posts.

Nobody is talking about electing me as mod except you; I stopped talking about it three weeks ago, and I documented that I only talked about it because of your encouragement that if we don't fix the lack of mods, who will.

I will add to this comment about the specifics in your graphic.


  1. Yes, I created forums for discussing all views on various topics when there was a landrush of names in 2022-02, and I accepted the risks of misunderstanding about my choice to claim controversial names for evangelistic purposes. Yes, that same post announced that I might use an alt for counterpoint purposes, which always admits being a doppelganger of myself and is never used for manipulation, which is in accord with policy on doppelgangers.

  2. Yes, u/MaryMagicPie offered me the moderation of two communities she had started when she decided to leave Scored. I did not immediately delete the Progress Pride Flag from the one site because I understood her intent for it, but when it was pointed out that her intent was not clear I deleted it. I explained the mistakes in your link here, explained the reasons for first retaining and then deleting the flag here, and explained how Mary's rules were to be interpreted here.

  3. Yes, I appreciate the earned media for the Swamp Rangers organization. You are free to sign up there.

Aside from your backing out of your raving endorsement of me as mod of Conspiracies and your forgetting that I told you all this already and everyone who clicks my name knows it, nobody cares.

I have a few communities, but didn't create one for conspiracies specifically because of this one. My taking the names c/FlatEarth, c/Nazi, and c/Holocaust has not resulted in much. Right now the new c/4thHorsemanNews by u/Tetartos_Ippeas is having a great debut for conspiracies and we could cross-pollinate in either direction.

You say you made 3 but you give up on your ego and promote a 4th one - not done by you... Respect for that! Honestly! I will visit them all, we need to expand! Hope others visit them too! ...

You see collaboration and you work for it. I cast my vote for you as moderator of c/Conspiracies! To me, you have proven that you left your ego behind and you want to accomplish the goal of the community. That does come with challenges from shills that would want to break you, but I know you're better than me, so I cast my vote firmly towards a person that is able to defend his position and leave his ego - you! You didn't have to prove your worth, but you did it anyway, for the best of this community. I really hope you can help us forward!

I hope we can vote for a moderator from this point on, so we can finalize it in a week. Anyone can cast their own votes. It's fine, if you vote for yourself even.

1
SwampRangers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not at all. To the Lord Jesus Christ I stand or fall. Same for this community. I have nothing to hide and I stopped trying to prove anything to you about three weeks ago when you acted like there was nothing more to add to your own judgment of things.

I exposed the lies on your link very obviously. My relationship with the two past moderators of that forum, who appreciated my evangelistic input, is public and I need add nothing to it. I am encouraged by the accusations against Jesus for fellowshipping with sexual sinners as well.

I am here to range the swamp. Tending those names is part of protecting the community from swamp creatures and rescuing those who fall into perils of the swamp. I didn't ask you to understand. But there's no evidence I've wronged anyone or acted un-Christian, and I'll be happy to hear and judge evidence, and repent if I make an actual mistake.

2
SwampRangers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Welcome to Scored. You may be unaware that there's a prior banned individual leading to new accounts continuing to get banned if they look like him. Don't look like him. I recommend (1) not sticking to a single topic over and over, (2) not rejoicing at people's deaths, (3) not categorizing whole people-groups (such as women) negatively (such as hypocritical), (4) not acting insincere about the person or group you larp as, as those are not only bad social behaviors but also markers for the prior profile. If those are all you have to offer the community, admin is not interested.

1
SwampRangers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wasn't the man who robbed Hitler of his life someone who could do no wrong? Oh wait, that guy was killed on Hitler's orders.

1
SwampRangers 1 point ago +1 / -0

They didn't belong to any other users, they were offered freely by admin on a first-come first-served basis, everyone got their fair share who was there. Admin very rarely awards a community to other users than the listed mods, and I appreciate their reticence even though I would suggest they do it more often. That's probably why they're not acting here.

1
SwampRangers 1 point ago +1 / -0

I watched it when you started reporting it. It's not acted on because this profile doesn't cleanly match the banned profile as other accounts did. As soon as it does I'm moving and c/Paleo can be counted on to move.

1
SwampRangers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good start. Now:

Worship the One Jew. The real Jesus is a Jew and King of the Jews. You deny Jesus every time you deflect from him.

Or, you could show the existence of some completely different ethnic group from Jesus's people who have better claim historiographically to the name "Jew" than his own people. It's not there.

2
SwampRangers 2 points ago +2 / -0

I upvote Joe on the occasions he has a point. Maybe I should stop for a bit just so you can have a more accurate count.

1
SwampRangers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mary was of a pure race, so her genealogy is given by Luke to prove that point (properly putting Joseph as the son-in-law of Heli). The fact that the race had been partly infiltrated doesn't affect that.

1
SwampRangers 1 point ago +1 / -0

People here might not be aware that your characterizations don't match the history. I did poll ChristianAnarchism as to its intent and it was clear they wanted no mod. That's as far as it went.

You're also proposing you know my intent, but the fact is I restored access to contents by relinking them, as I had no interest in creating new deletion rules that didn't exist; the original moderator had of course nuked her own content and I respected that. Nor were the contributors permabanned because c/Christianity doesn't permaban, as I keep telling you. A couple had blocks of various lengths. Nor is your characterization of Christianity mods supported by evidence, and we've been trying to help you get past the perceived need to keep on with that characterization. If you think that some deleted content at Christianity that shows "mod sins" without breaking rules itself should be restored, let me know. Christianity does not censor content, it only disciplines behavior.

You're free to your own opinions, but not to your own facts. Facts belong to God, they don't change from person to person.

1
SwampRangers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, I've always looked at embedded missionaries as having the most effective fruit, starting with Paul in Corinth. But when you say:

Arriving to some ecumenist perenialist compromise that has nothing to do with the true Church and the faith of Christ? We're not freemasons. Don't give me that bs. Everyone participating in ecumenist efforts and dialogues (like the Rockefeller ran WCC) should be excommunicated. Jesus nukes bridges between His people and the heterodox, Satan is the one who brings people in false unity in his one world religion and beast system.

That's very similar to where I've been before, and currently I would say it's still a risk but there ought to be an ability for the discerning to distinguish false bridges from true. In 251 the church started arguing over whether welcoming the Lapsi was a true or false bridge. So I can't dismiss it out of hand as your appeal to theology does. But I take your warning seriously as I don't want to be involved in the false, even as I have recently been given my own charge and it looks more false to some people than any other charge I've gotten.

The words for "worship" are pretty difficult and I'm not arguing them right now, I was just chiming in my view. If Rome actually taught that Jews and Muslims by their systems' theology already worshipped God the Father (who is always one with the Son if he is to be worshipped at all), that would be pretty clearly contrary to prior teaching, which is why I'm confident the casuists permitted the phrasing that retains ambiguity. (Obviously righteous Jews before Christ worshipped God the Father without contradicting the Son or knowing the details about him, but if someone rejects the Son after he's been revealed then that's out.) Jewish theology stays agnostic about Jesus, despite their folk practices that go beyond the theology, and Muslim theology is pretty anti-Jesus but has pathways to permit the truth, and the only way to Jesus within those systems is by finding the truth about Jesus in spite of the system. So I have hope for those; and I understand officially Orthodoxy does not forbid hope.

1
SwampRangers 1 point ago +1 / -0

To adore and contemplate is, for casuists like the pope, not to worship. He's trying to be kissy with them and find commonalities and still not press Christian tradition beyond its guardrails. Obviously the person who "adores God" but doesn't acknowledge Jesus as God is incomplete in theology and practice. But if we want to evangelize them we do better to accept the right things in their approach, and build from them, rather than to lead by rejecting minor wrong things that their cultures currently approve out of felicitous inconsistency.

If Orthodoxy appears to have nothing to offer but 3-year secluded catechesis, it's less likely to build bridges. Missionaries who spend 3 years learning another person's culture have much more fruit. Does that make enough sense?

1
SwampRangers 1 point ago +1 / -0

This board? I showed the links. When another party mentioned his mod skills, I mentioned mine. When he endorsed me as mod, I put out a feeler post. When it didn't generate more interest, I withdrew. Since then it's just been a matter of seeking to gage the community's interest. I think pretty clearly the community doesn't have a collective interest in settling this or in generating critical mass; they mostly prefer anarchy. It would be silly for any subgroup to assert themselves without critical mass.

2
SwampRangers 2 points ago +2 / -0

The link explains that I'm taking out a large number of names and lays out the general strategy. It should be sufficient for people without an axe to grind. The specific pages are for conversation of all kinds about their main topics. If you have a better idea, be my guest.

1
SwampRangers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Next to no effort at all, I check in and post when I can, and I attract whoever comes. No point in abandoning it.

2
SwampRangers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes to the first, when you deny Christ by saying he came as Hitler, you are over the target you regard as the enemy. However, no weapon formed against us will prosper so your bombs only destroy yourself. Plus it's not "flak" if someone points out that you admitted being a heretic by agreeing with the statement that you're a heretic. Perhaps your war plan needs rethinking. Perhaps you don't understand Christians due to never having known Jesus Christ. Say His Name, say Jesus Christ is Lord.

3
SwampRangers 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is indeed an anti-Christian conspiracy. "Positive Christianity" rejects the Son of God, in its own definition, and is as much a blasphemous cult as "Christian Science". Further:

The real Jesus came back as the greatest leader we've ever seen, named Adolf Hitler. And He was quite a hit! https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARcz4U8xS/fending-off-the-anti-christ/c/4eXvGkg6NZi

Hitler was the Second Coming of Christ as he did the Lord's Work. (Although he didn't want to be seen as a religion). https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARczAAxEq/turntohitlernow-/c/4eXuy0BKbpv

Add:

You done screwed up, Jesus was a man who was the son of God, not God himself you absolute retard 😂 https://scored.co/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARczBJtK4/now-the-truth-comes-out--they-bl/c/4eXvGkqJwal

He did all the things Jesus did. His spirit rose from the grave and the world realized He Was Righteous. Blessed is he 🙏🏻 https://scored.co/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARcz4U9UO/x/c/4eXvGkqKUM5

By this point the conspiracy is being scuttled into ridicule so that it can remain to be reused later. The only recourse, and for which we pray, is the conversion of souls to God the Son.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›