Maybe you two should shut up, I'm getting paid twice as much for every comment on this post (because twice nothing is nothing) and y'all're really making the nonexistent cash register spin. Do I know how to pick a controversial conspiracy topic or what?
Where do you and Aristotle learn your morals from that makes them "better" than any others?
Implied threat. Why don't you just agree that we need a mod here to decide these rules authoritatively rather than (checks notes) pilpul?
Thanks Guy, a couple more such meta reminders would not be excessive. IMHO. Keep the faith.
You missed the ironic implication so I'll spell it out. Don't bring people up that you don't want others to tag. Pretty simple, we learned it when becoming church members, it used to be called "Thou shalt not go up and down as a talebearer among thy people" (Lev. 19:16). Speaking of which, where do you and Aristotle learn your morals from that makes them "better" than any others?
Sex and the City was gay culture being sold as if it were straight culture, so they wanted someone who (we'd now say) looks trans.
I often tag people whom others bring up if I think they should be tagged to the conversation about them.
Your statement changes the subject pretty seriously. Pro-freedom ideology is simply what I call Christian liberty. Coercive digital dictatorship is simply what I call the beast system. Pretty straightforward. But my point was that neither means anything if everyone's existence is the same as their nonexistence, which is what you said. Your investments have no purpose, moths have eaten your clothes. You have no "better" and no "good". And this is true of anyone who denies a moral lawgiver but then claims to have values, when you seek what they mean or their source you find nothing. Morality can only come from a source outside the known universe, it doesn't arise out of the materialist elements of this world, because there's no reason for any action to be regarded as better than any other by any objective reason, and whatever I say is good for me cannot be gainsaid by anyone else's appeal. When you find that source of morality outside yourself, then we're talking.
The sidebar rule is against "calls to violence". You called to violence. u/Thisisnotanexit didn't.
There is no "better" if it'll be "like you never existed". You have no permanent bettering and all your investments turn to dust. Doing the right thing or the wrong thing doesn't change anything if it's all dust. There is no standard of good, so everyone does what is good in his own eyes and you have no power to judge natalists for being "bad" because they're following your same rule in seeking to do the right thing to make their only life "better" as they define it. Perhaps you'd like to find a definition of "good" that works for both you and u/Kaarous, before you mouth off that you know "better" and he doesn't? (He at least likes to see me trying, I'm sure.)
Christ welcomes all who come to him, in fact he got in trouble for it. I did make a miscalculation, namely the real satanists don't really want to talk about it in a public forum (but there was one literal witch here who did for awhile, and there was one claiming to be a satanist on PDW for a couple posts but people thought he was larping). Why don't you post satanic acts on the satanism forum then? An unused forum is easily slid with even a single post, but you're working so hard on this Sisyphean incline instead.
I also warned him that the admins appear to have instructed Paleo to suspend and nuke accounts posting gore of young women immediately. It would be disappointing to lose so much Conspiracies content at once, but maybe they'll just delete the one comment you refer to and take that as the middle line. But it would also be very air-clearing for that account to be gone.
But it's impossible for you to mod c/SynagogueOfSatan without encouraging it! By your logic.
Important for what? Other people who also cease to exist at death? Where is your purpose unless something important exists outside you? (Hint: Something more important than what you were told in Catholicism, something you have the power to discern better for yourself all the time.)
^ says the alt of the c/SynagogueOfSatan mod
^ says the alt of the c/SynagogueOfSatan mod
^ says the alt of the c/SynagogueOfSatan mod
^ says the alt of the c/SynagogueOfSatan mod
^ says the alt of the c/SynagogueOfSatan mod
^ says the alt of the c/SynagogueOfSatan mod
And then after refusing to ban when it might not be the same person, he banned him when it was clearly the same person.
You want me to delete my welcome posts to those two fora allowing all discussion on all sides of the subject? Those are forum rules and they are my only posts there. Apparently you're still unclear on the concept.
Oh look, u/JosephGoebbels5 is a moderator of c/SynagogueOfSatan, I guess that means you're a satanist by your logic.
^ says the alt of the c/SynagogueOfSatan mod
We already know you don't believe in the Jesus of the Bible, thanks for admitting you don't believe in the Bible either. Watch Bonhoeffer and note the confessing church and the Reich "church". You are refighting that war that your side lost once.
I don't usually click your links but dude, even though Paleo presumes you're not the ephebophile here he might suspend you for that one link anyway. In the absence of a mod, people behave themselves or they get natural consequences aka hitting the wall of concrete authority. You've shown ability to behave yourself (but not tonight). You've been asked politely to delete or self-edit the link. Dots 1 and 2 are so close I don't need to connect them for you.
If they were last moments we wouldn't have the known fact about the experience, would we? Your position is backed by NDEs, not actual death experiences. Now, if you've read the two classic works on the subject, Life After Life and Imagine Heaven, you'd know that even with NDEs there is too much going on to attribute it to simple oxygen deprivation. But that's a sideline of evidence, the evidence starts with you believing you have a purpose, which you evidence every time you respond here.
Was Jesus God (I Am)?
What if one's free will of choice chooses to deny the suggestion? Was Jesus not God then?
Can free will bind itself? Or is it bound from binding itself?