The idea is to create a "Peoples Congress" of many thousands of the world's richest and most powerful people.
This guy is hilarious.
Username checks out.
The last thing in the world they want is the masses ruling.
I'm guessing one a year, minimum.
I clicked a Facebook link on the old conspiracy subreddit. Facebook's message was, "This content is not for you." I had to reload it from the address bar in order to view it.
The lethal and debilitating side effects are wretched, but I think the people behind it don't really know if this is the result of Chinese gain-of-function research, let alone what those new functions are. To them, it could well be worth it to sacrifice a small percentage of people to reduce the risk of wiping out most of the population.
Funny, but keep in mind that research and discussion about deep politics are not conspiracy theories. That is a term coined by the U.S. government to marginalize thought outside their official narratives.
You must be mistaken. All that was wiped by BleachBit, like with a washcloth or something, and then the whole server caught fire in the Clintons' bathroom and was very thoroughly burned into molten metal. It could happen to anyone.
This appears well-intentioned, but it might have unintended consequences.
I don't think such a law is possible because the government needs to deceive people. That is why the Obama administration repealed the ban on government propaganda in the United States. They would never enact something in good faith that would actually thwart their ability to do disinform.
U.S. Repeals Propaganda Ban, Spreads Government-Made News to Americans https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/07/14/u-s-repeals-propaganda-ban-spreads-government-made-news-to-americans/
Thank you.
No reasonable person would think that criticizing Facebook is tantamount to calling out Jews as a people. Expressing such a view would be so outlandishly biased as to be easily shot down as long as there is a person willing to take the time to do so in a measured way.
You might find that people would in fact consider such a statement as being antisemitic if it has been framed in that context, such as, "Look at what the Jews at Facebook have done now!" Another reason might be if the source constantly rails against Jews. In these cases, it's the intent that is judged as being antisemitic and not necessarily the statement itself.
I am sure you already know this, but what those people call "fact checking" is really just a copycat of Chinese-style online propaganda and an excuse to censor information that is contrary to what they want people to believe.
Anyway, here's a new study that shows naturally occurring antibodies are 13 times more effective at preventing infection than the Pfizer double jab.
Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1
LOL, that's awesome. Just after I posted that I realized you were talking about abortion rather than COVID-19 jabs.
Please share those with us! Also, it would be great if you could share any you know of that were used years ago but have since either been superseded or gone "underground."
Yes, that's it. In the part you quoted, they are comparing the numbers from mid-July to those from late January. I think we need to wait about four months for the peak numbers to come in before coming to a conclusion.
Also, see how they compared the current numbers to a peak historical number...
I don't understand, sorry.
You could simply say something to support your argument.
Still too early to tell. It is early September. I don't think it is effective at preventing infection.
Because the shots don't protect you from getting it.
Of course not.
Actually, their third fundamental tenet (out of seven) states:
III One’s body is inviolable, subject to one’s own will alone.
Absolutely! Military psychological operations, intelligence agencies, former military, public relations firms, political parties, politically active groups, volunteers and more. Every major country.
I've seen people doing this on tiny IRC chats, gaming forums, private bittorrent tracker forums and chatrooms, comments sections any just about any other kind of forum. This has been going on for years and they weren't AI.
I read proof of this in software products to assist groups of people brigade news articles that contained certain keywords. The software would monitor various outlets and then alert everyone on the team (hundreds or thousands of people per issue) that a story relevant to their cause was new. They would then work together to try and shape public opinion on it when it was getting lots of views.
That information is now omitted from search engine results (otherwise I would show you), even though the software today is more prevalent and has more features than before.
Cool. What book, may I ask?
I'll bet she has quite a few lessons to teach.
Thank you for the response, but it is almost thoroughly false nonsense.
Antisemitism is racial hatred toward Semitic people. None of that is apparent in the post. And there is nothing to try, so it's weird that you would tell me to "try it."
You forgot:
The power to "add, copy, delete or alter" data on anyone's devices, even if they don't know the identity of the owner. Yes, they are now legally allowed to hack your device, look at anything you have on it, download it and change it as they see fit.
The power to take over any online accounts, lock the account holder out of it, impersonate the account holder and even do this secretly. They can also edit or delete anything you have posted with the account.
The power to access any networks you may be using in order to "overcome security features like encryption."
Australia’s new mass surveillance mandate https://digitalrightswatch.org.au/2021/09/02/australias-new-mass-surveillance-mandate/