Yes, that's it. In the part you quoted, they are comparing the numbers from mid-July to those from late January. I think we need to wait about four months for the peak numbers to come in before coming to a conclusion.
Also, see how they compared the current numbers to a peak historical number...
I am sure you already know this, but what those people call "fact checking" is really just a copycat of Chinese-style online propaganda and an excuse to censor information that is contrary to what they want people to believe.
Anyway, here's a new study that shows naturally occurring antibodies are 13 times more effective at preventing infection than the Pfizer double jab.
Still too early to tell. It is early September. I don't think it is effective at preventing infection.
Yes, that's it. In the part you quoted, they are comparing the numbers from mid-July to those from late January. I think we need to wait about four months for the peak numbers to come in before coming to a conclusion.
Also, see how they compared the current numbers to a peak historical number...
I am sure you already know this, but what those people call "fact checking" is really just a copycat of Chinese-style online propaganda and an excuse to censor information that is contrary to what they want people to believe.
Anyway, here's a new study that shows naturally occurring antibodies are 13 times more effective at preventing infection than the Pfizer double jab.
Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1