No reasonable person would think that criticizing Facebook is tantamount to calling out Jews as a people. Expressing such a view would be so outlandishly biased as to be easily shot down as long as there is a person willing to take the time to do so in a measured way.
You might find that people would in fact consider such a statement as being antisemitic if it has been framed in that context, such as, "Look at what the Jews at Facebook have done now!" Another reason might be if the source constantly rails against Jews. In these cases, it's the intent that is judged as being antisemitic and not necessarily the statement itself.
You are repeatedly making the case that people interested in conspiracies hold a particular point of view regarding Jews.
I have seen that tactic used dozens of times to depict users of conspiracy forms as stupid. The way the trick works is to post stupid things and then other accounts can swoop in with a great rebuttal with the parting shot, "Well, this IS a conspiracy forum."
So given that as my personal observation, it shouldn't surprise you that it looks suspicious to me when I see you repeatedly assert that since there has historically been talk of a Jew Conspiracy, then that is a basic part of participating in a conspiracy forum. It looks too much like you are trying to persuade people that that is the case.
And this just happens to precisely coincide with academic literature being written all about the nasty things you can read about the Jews in "extremist" conspiracy forums. I don't remember this being a big problem until just recently when that started happening.
Thank you.
No reasonable person would think that criticizing Facebook is tantamount to calling out Jews as a people. Expressing such a view would be so outlandishly biased as to be easily shot down as long as there is a person willing to take the time to do so in a measured way.
You might find that people would in fact consider such a statement as being antisemitic if it has been framed in that context, such as, "Look at what the Jews at Facebook have done now!" Another reason might be if the source constantly rails against Jews. In these cases, it's the intent that is judged as being antisemitic and not necessarily the statement itself.
It is hard to completely follow what you are saying. It seems barely relevant to what I said like some sort of AI-generated text.
You are repeatedly making the case that people interested in conspiracies hold a particular point of view regarding Jews.
I have seen that tactic used dozens of times to depict users of conspiracy forms as stupid. The way the trick works is to post stupid things and then other accounts can swoop in with a great rebuttal with the parting shot, "Well, this IS a conspiracy forum."
So given that as my personal observation, it shouldn't surprise you that it looks suspicious to me when I see you repeatedly assert that since there has historically been talk of a Jew Conspiracy, then that is a basic part of participating in a conspiracy forum. It looks too much like you are trying to persuade people that that is the case.
And this just happens to precisely coincide with academic literature being written all about the nasty things you can read about the Jews in "extremist" conspiracy forums. I don't remember this being a big problem until just recently when that started happening.