I couldn't figure out what happened in the video. How do we know he was working with the government?

Agent Smith!

I used to believe that online shilling was some group per cause or organization, with governments maybe having hundreds of people who controlled ten or more accounts each. Some more, some less, like USA, China, Russia, Five Eyes could be in the thousands. It doesn't work like that. They thoroughly own forums and chats.

I found this out when I pissed off one group so damn much with the information I would share, they started private messaging me every few seconds with a large number of usernames. I think they were messing with me to show me how many of them there were and I had no hope of having a positive impact.

And yes, regarding the #Justice4Jan6 demonstrations, they owned the living hell out of it and won big. Even the word "glowies" is a huge red flag for me that something is disinformation.

When shill accounts "lose their shit," it's for various reasons. Primarily, it makes them look more like an actual person. It also degrades the quality of whatever communication can happen, especially if the opposition is baited into similar behavior. I have seen it happen enough times to know for certain that it is a calculated tactic to disrupt the messaging of information they would like to suppress.

The agents provocateur I've spotted mostly look like crazies, degenerates and other types of people that are easy to underestimate.

Federal level people I've seen have been almost universally foreign born and ethnically a minority in the United States. Of course they will find people who they think will blend in, but it occurred to me that perhaps a private security contractor (mercenary group) would be more limited to an ethnic majority, and perhaps even need something to symbolize to others on the same side who is on the same team, like a certain kind of shades.

It was on "both sides" in the sense that Republicans and Democrats rigged the machines against Trump and Sanders during the 2016 nomination processes. I just don't think Trump would participate in the cheating for the reasons I listed.

I believe that is what some people wanted to happen and were pushing for travel to "exotic" locations unable to fully roll out the shots in a bid to infect millions of impoverished people with a hot variant. Thank goodness they have been unsuccessful so far.

The timing of both versions of the story are politically motivated.

I would be shocked if anyone involved were punished in any meaningful way, as I think the entire thing was a Deep State operation.

Well said. For people who haven't heard, a "hot" variant is one that has more severe/deadly symptoms.

I would add that the "digital" certificates will be designed to have your biometric information on chip. Fingerprints, biometric face photograph, and perhaps more. They will make it so you need that certificate to access the Internet, even from public locations.

As for the additional scare events, I think that's getting ahead of ourselves.

Hipsters from the 1980s.

I would like more information about this. Could this be a psychological operation to plant a false image of what federal agents look like?

Huh. Actually a good look for her.

I don't think that qualifies, but it would certainly qualify in the eyes of the Deep State if anti-globalists did this. They don't play fairly.

We can't know because of classified information. It could be that the people who have gotten the shot will do better against bioweapons that rely upon the spike protein.

It is tempting to think this way for sure. The problems include:

1. It would be an illegal and an unfathomable breech of ethics that would shake American democracy to the core.

2. It would surely be detected and caught. The entire Deep State apparatus would seize upon the faked results to literally take control of the nation.

3. The supreme hypocrisy of it! Donald Trump has spent half a decade repeatedly calling out election fraud. Why on earth would he do it himself? To "win?"

What do you mean all of a sudden? Can't you see that people who write those things are fakes? Look at the domain here. Dot-WIN. I would expect staunch support of Israel here.

Bear in mind that:

Firstly, a large majority of Israelis have taken the jabs--more than in any other country. The ramification here is that the hospitalization statistics will reflect this and should be normalized to account for the difference.

Secondly, the remaining group of people who have opted out of the jabs so far, in all likelihood, disproportionately consist of individuals who have a low risk of developing severe COVID-19 symptoms. The ramification here is that our analysis should account for a lower percentage of the unjabbed group needing hospitalization in the event they contract COVID-19.

Taking those two factors into account, these results are less unexpected than one might initially think.

As for the jabbed being a danger to others, I have been writing that in this forum for months. I wholly expected that to be the case.

Vaccinations can be a controversial subject for many people, especially when it comes to injections. So what if you could replace your next shot with a salad instead?

It literally sounds like an April Fool's joke--as if the fact that it is injected is controversial.

I am actually starting to envision a future world where multi-millionaires are able to have all of their food properly sourced and tested to not be tampered with in this manner. At the same time, they receive a gene therapy that makes them immune to aging.

Meanwhile, the only food affordable to the rest of us has been genetically modified to be an mRNA gene therapy that triggers a deadly cytokine storm in anyone who receives the life-extension gene therapy by attacking one of its proteins. It's like we're all replicants from Blade Runner.

Feds work in teams and there is no way there would just be "that guy" who is a fed out to have their say with a single downvote.

Learning institutions use flames and torches to represent enlightenment and the passing on of knowledge. The original logo for the Smithsonian Institution had torches on it. In 1966, the sun from founder James Smithson's coat of arms was made into a new logo. In heraldry the design is called "The Sun in His Splendor." It still represents truth and knowledge, but at an even greater magnitude.

https://1000logos.net/smithsonian-logo/

https://siarchives.si.edu/collections/siris_sic_13282

https://worldstrides.com/blog/2018/03/did-you-know-the-smithsonian-logo/

You are looking at the picture beside the word "dudebro" in the dictionary.

No, you are mistaken. This is clearly the Ray-Ban Right Wing Terror Group.

Reminded me of:

Did DHS round-up dissidents on Friday night? Here is what I know. https://conspiracies.win/p/13zMZQt9Ij/did-dhs-roundup-dissidents-on-fr/

I think shills post racist, antisemitic, mysogynist, homophobic and transphobic material as well as calls to violence in forums so that people can publish academic papers about hate speech and extremist content permeating online venues. It is an obvious call to action for even more government tech censorship.

It's like how demonstrations the deep state doesn't like have a few people showing swastikas to the news cameras. Oh, look how bad they are--look how they aren't called out (never on the news, anyway)!

I think some of the online shills are actually the FBI. While in reality they are shaping public opinion against forums that question government narratives, they can always claim that they were following up on reports of possible breeding grounds for domestic terrorists.

Just looking at this post and your comments within, I see you linked to an openly neo-Nazi website, said you were "locking and loading and getting ready to shoot" people, and you--not I--brought up the Holocaust to tell us (cry) about it being a hoax. How is it that you accuse me of being a shill when your actions make you so indistinguishable from one?

I think it is an outrageous claim because there has never been even an indication--numerical, statistical or otherwise--that Donald Trump stole votes from other candidates ever. The very opposite has always been true.