Everything you need to know about this has been published 120 years ago in the Protocols. Then none other than Henry Ford elaborated on this in his International Jew, as have authors from around the world like count Cherep-Spiridovich (The Hidden Hand) and Landowski (Red Symphony). Yet people still act surprised as if it's not a centuries-old plan to enslave humanity via satanic revolutions, propaganda, mind control, degeneracy and subversion of the Church and state.
This is why they don't need censorship - they just engineer society so that people don't research or get exposed to certain books and authors and even if they do, you convince them it's make-belief and wild conspiracy theory motivated by antisemitism. Why burn books when you can control minds?
It's always them. They (the Hidden Hand) are behind every single political assassination and bloody revolution. This shouldn't even be up for discussion here.
But Trump is in on it. His assassination attempt was staged and he most likely knew about it.
Yes, it may be a warning for all the talking heads who think of they can turn against them.
Btw, I asked ChatGPT to give me examples of other similar plane crashes where the plane got completely disintegrated. It proceeded to give me a list of crashes where huge chunks of the plane were visible and scattered. One of the examples which it claimed showed "a completely disintegrated plane" even had an intact huge ass tire among the wreckage.
The fact of the matter is there is not a single plane crash like this one in the whole history of aviation.
Pretty much 1984 really.
Both probably. Ultimately it's always a government psy op. The "domestic terrorists" are MK-Ultra programmed Manchurian candidates.
My mind is open to anything, but this is the dumbest move Israel could have ever done if it's true
It only looks dumb and illogical when you don't know their agenda and their methods. They would never kill Fuentes because he's their white supremacist Hitler/Emanuel Goldstein figure. They need a boogeyman to justify clamping down on antisemitism. This is why they hold AJ on air - he's their conspiracy boogeyman. It also helps with the democratic free-speech facade they put on their talmudic regime in the West.
Getting rid of Charlie works in several ways:
-
He's big enough to cause an outrage among the right and moderate enough to encompass the whole faction and not just the far-right. They want to deepen the left-right division and ultimately to cause a civil war.
-
They know it will come to people's attention that he recently questioned his allegiance to Israel and killing him sets a perfect example of what happens to those who betray them. They've already done this with JFK (https://x.com/ShaykhSulaiman/status/1752489118464979191).
These people are never stupid and everything they do is carefully planned and tested.
But before that, you answered to my question with "I don't care".
This action is disrespectful.
Lol, ok mr snowflake. It sure triggered you.
Anyway, leave me alone I don't want to talk to you.
Yes, I am inclined to believe the shooting was a real assassination by the Hidden hand. Not so much because they were threatened by Kirk, but because they want to stir shit up and get the rightwingers riled up for a civil war.
Their end goal is always a bloody revolution or a war and they always finance both sides. All they truly care about is spilling as much blood as possible because they are Satan's spawn. They hate people more than anything because we bear the image of God and He chose us for salvation and eternal life in Him.
How do you study gnosis?
There are limited starting positions when it comes to metaphysics and epistemology and I already know what they are. He only needs to state which one are his and how they relate together in a coherent and logically consistent worldview that can explain and justify fundamental concepts like truth, meaning, laws of logic, morality, knowledge, etc.
Stayed for the ass though
I said you're probably not intelligent, which is a challenge.
That's called sophistry. You were being a smartass. I don't waste time with lying sophists who twist their words and the meaning of what they say.
Go to Church and speak to a priest about your spiritual problems.
Goodbye.
It was based on his own words though and I have good reason to believe it is correct (unless he disproves me). It being subjective doesn't mean it's not objectively true.
Nah, the kikes want a racial civil war. It's all a setup for another one of their bloody rituals like all the wars and revolutions they start. The do the opposite of distracting - they build the tension up and it's going down in a few months. The next 5 years will be hell on Earth and 2030 will be the reset which will "bring normalcy back".
When you know how they operate, it becomes boring and predictable.
Those who repented and became Christian.
I'm guessing what his worldview is based on what he writes here. If I've made wrong conclusions I'd be glad to hear him explaining his worldview and how he justifies the knowledge he has.
The "why" here would be his justification and unless he states it clearly I have to guess it. The thing is there are no infinite positions to take and it can be narrowed down to what I said.
That's subjective.
That's redundant. All beliefs are subjective by definition, because they are property of the individual mind (that doesn't mean the thing being believed is subjective though). We are limited by our mode of being.
And who is behind Ukraine and Antifa? It's always the jews and their hidden hand of course. They are bloodthirsty murderers. There is a reason Meyer Amschel (Rotchild I) was called the Great Assassin.
https://x.com/GarbageHuman24/status/1965903417173581899/photo/1
Shit is going down. Just as many predicted, they are ramping it for the winter.
Btw, notice how much different this hit was than the fake psy op attempt on Trump's ear. When it's real, they never miss just like with Lincoln and the Kennedys.
Makes no sense. According to John 1, the Word is Christ, the second person of the Godhead. He is a person, not an attribute or an abstraction..
I can justify what I said above. I'd say it's an objective assessment and not a subjective belief.
Basically he believes Christian ideas about God are dogma forced by man-made institutions to control people, while his spiritual gnosis is his own and somehow not influenced by various contradictory ideas and that he escapes dogmatism because the beliefs are made up (rather compiled) by him.
Way to steal my arguments and think you're insightful. Do you want to compare the insults you made to those I made? Let's do it:
You started the whole thing by calling me "not intelligent", then I called you a "dumbass" - call it quid pro quo.
Then I said "you were a dick", which you were because insulting someone out of the blue is considered a dick behavior. You called me a "smaller dumber dick" (makes no sense because responding to an insult with an insult is warranted, even if stooping down) and went on about me being disrespectful (cry as they strike you behavior) and my upbringing (projection).
Then you started writing your essays full of insults: "jackass", "tiny, little brain", more parent stuff. This was followed by my reply, containing zero insults, where I explain my perspective.
To this you doubled down with the ad homs about how fragile irl I am. Notice I never made any direct insults about your personality. My insults were calling out your behavior here and now but not making conclusions about your character. I never did the feminine psychologizing thing you constantly do.
Then I followed up with a good faith response again with zero insults or jabs. Your reply was more civil than usual too but you ended sounding full of yourself as if you were owed an apology and I was the one who started the insults. This blatant gaslighting didn't sit well with me and I called it out (no insults again other than pointing out I stooped to your level by responding with insults, which is an objective statement).
This caused you to fly off the handle calling me "a cruel, vicious animal", "a rabid dog", "dumb", "gullible idiot", "evil". But I have to quote the last part because it's absolutely psychotic and deranged:
Satan can go on vacation with how well you react to people... I still pity the ones that know you in real life... Assuming you haven't killed them all already... Vicious, rabid dog, you... Go chase a bone, you abomination.
You seriously need help dude. Anything I said after that is completely warranted. This is as bad as it gets. What could even warrant such language? Maybe some despicable crime?
Can you at least step back as you read this recap and realize how unhinged you behaved in our little exchange here? Do you consider that proper Christian behavior and even worse - a way to behave towards a fellow Christian? Idk what demons you have and I hope you get rid of them through prayer and repentance. Lashing out at anonymous strangers on the internet won't help you. It just feeds your anger and pride.
But with all your insults and snowflake behavior, you have proved that my words are true.
Projecting much? You're crashing out, dude. I don't even have to reply - you only embarrass and contradict yourself further the more you insult me.
I know you don't have time to read my long comments, because I know you're stupid.
Smart people value their time and don't waste it reading drawn out pedantic bs. A skim-through can do. Not that you'd know that. Only midwits think writing long comments full of tautologies is a sign of intelligence. You are more concerned with sounding witty with your ad homs than saying anything meaningful.
I really blame your parents tho... They never cared about you. That's why you have no respect and you act in this way...
More projection. Do you consider yourself well brought up the way you lash out at people for no reason at all? You're a sad person really.
First off, there's no such a thing as a unified gnostic doctrine. It's relativistic. I may be gnostic and believe in things that contradict other gnostics' beliefs. So who's right, what is the correct gnosticism and how is this determined?
Second, why should one trust the Gnostic gospels over the Church teachings? How do you determine what gospels are true and what's your criteria? You ignored my question about how do you justify that knowledge at all. Gnosticism makes countless claims about the nature of our world and its history and I want to know how are they justified?
How has the hidden knowledge you base your worldview on been preserved through the centuries? And even if we assume it was true, what makes you think it hasn't been tampered with by its enemies (the RCC) who pretty much ruled the world until recently?
Unless you deep dive in sewers. You'll only find crap then.
I know the book. You've linked it before and I took a look. It's a total mess of word-concept fallacy and wild interpretations of what the Christianity represents.
Again, gnostics have been around for 2000 years and I'd rather read what OG gnostics like Simon Magus, Valentinus, Marcion and Mani had to say and not people centuries later. If you truly cared for the truth, you'd read how their arguments were defeated by their contemporaries - the Early Church Fathers. It's pointless to rehash a 2000 year old debate.
The point is I don't need to study all of gnosticism to know it's false. I can refute it simply by disproving it's foundational principles like dualism.
Here's an example of a quick refutation of gnosticism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BgDwGHmKc4