Let's face it, we all wanted Zio-cons to start waking up and call out Israel. Charlie Kirk did. He may not have been the most vocal and didn't (yet) turn fully against them, but he touched the third rail more than once and most likely paid the ultimately price for it. What more can you ask for?
He called out Oct 7th as a stand down by Israel, and even mentioned that Bibi was having political trouble before that event / needed a distraction. Do you think Bibi has forgotten that?
He also called out Epstein as Mossad linked and brought people to TPUSA events saying the same. That is a real big no-no in Zio-world.
Frankly, what he did publicly is more than most of us have done or will do. So, show respect when it is due. I salute Charlie Kirk for his service to America and to humanity. He refused to be a slave to the Synagogue of Satan.
It only looks dumb and illogical when you don't know their agenda and their methods. They would never kill Fuentes because he's their white supremacist Hitler/Emanuel Goldstein figure. They need a boogeyman to justify clamping down on antisemitism. This is why they hold AJ on air - he's their conspiracy boogeyman. It also helps with the democratic free-speech facade they put on their talmudic regime in the West.
Getting rid of Charlie works in several ways:
He's big enough to cause an outrage among the right and moderate enough to encompass the whole faction and not just the far-right. They want to deepen the left-right division and ultimately to cause a civil war.
They know it will come to people's attention that he recently questioned his allegiance to Israel and killing him sets a perfect example of what happens to those who betray them. They've already done this with JFK (https://x.com/ShaykhSulaiman/status/1752489118464979191).
These people are never stupid and everything they do is carefully planned and tested.