It's no unexplained. Most of the cases happened shortly after vaccination.
I bet it does and that's why it's the most widespread drug in the West. Because tptb want you to be a free thinker and totally not enslaved to the system.
And Bitcoin will help overcome it. At least this is what the X post suggests.
No, the Fed corporation functions as a National central bank and creates money. The Treasury, a government institution, issues bonds to borrow money. This means that the Treasury only uses money that has already been created by the Fed, either obtained by taxes or when the Fed bought Treasury debt. The Treasury mints coins but that's a miniscule amount of the money volume.
But that's still not where over 90% of the money comes from - which is commercial bank loans and credits. This is the driving process behind money creation and that's why lowering interest rates leads to more loans and increase of money supply aka inflation.
It's amazing that people are so ignorant how the money system works and where money comes from. I mean, how can anyone be critical of the system (or any alternative system like gold and BTC) if they don't even know how it works? I bet you that not a single person on this forum beside me knows this widely available basic information. Why? Because people are lazy and think they know it all and prefer writing bs instead of reading a damn book. It all comes to pride and lack of humility which prevents people from learning from others.
Beautiful. Reply again, fiat enjoyer.
Lol I'm not the one who loves fiat. I explained why that's the worst system. You hate fiat alternatives like Bitcoin and want to keep your Fed magic paper.
Hmm; who insulted whom first?
Are you kidding? You're a schizo dude, of course you started it jut like every time.
Meanwhile in fake and gay dialectic world where you're either on our team or on theirs:
You agree on one thing with the other side, therefore you're one of them
You got triggered by me criticizing the post you shared and calling it (not you) low IQ? You're way too sensitive then if such a comment causes you to disengage. Men openly criticize when other men say something dumb and use a more straightforward language. If I'm nor right you can always counter me and tell me why my take is stupid.
No wonder that society is feminized and cucked when I'm getting tone policed on a conspiracy forum for calling something low IQ...
You didn't have to write all that to prove that you're an anti-intllectual derranged dumbass who can't hold a simple conversation without going to ad homs and strawmen.
The only distinction an ideologist would make is whether “the becoming” of an idea counts as the idea being “made real.” A layman wouldn’t think to make the distinction.
Wow, that's very deep. You sounded like the free-will-of-choice bot here.
Hence why you’re being made fun of for accepting the definition you’re told.
That's why I asked you what the good definition you use is because you're so smart and I bet you'r rich too.
Meanwhile, everyone who has ever read a law or opened an economic textbook knows what money is.
Somehow I know that's not you. But you can always open one and look it up. I asked you a simple economics 101 question and you crashed out.
Said you while insulting me back. The only difference between us standing is that I made an actual argument and all you did is go after me.
As opposed to what - fake numbers on a piece of paper or fake numbers on your bank account? Come on, we've been through this bs. The medium for money doesn't have to have intrinsic value as a commodity.
For money to be sound, it has to be hard, scarce, durable, portable, divisible, and resistant to manipulation, with a high stock-to-flow ratio that enables it to function as a reliable store of value across generations. Bitcoin fulfills all of those better than any other currency in history, including the gold standard. Government fiat is not even worth mentioning, it's literally the worst debt-slave inflationary system ever devised, yet all the Bitcoin haters would rather have that than crypto.
I can't believe we agree on something.
Words have definitions
Don't ask me what it is because it's basic and everyone knows it
And I'm the sophist here lol.
Just because people take something for granted and self evident doesn't mean shit. Definitions tend to get very technical when you delve seriously in the subject. If I ask some rando person what existence is, he'd probably answer me the way you did. If I asked someone who has studied philosophy it's a different story. Same applies to economics and money. Your non-answer told me which person you are of the two.
Government spending doesn't necessitate increase of money supply. The conspiracy here is that the centralized banking system inflates the money supply by money printing and control of interest rates, thus robbing people of their savings and creating the boom-bust cycle which causes economic instability.
Why? What's the definition of money and how does BTC fail to meet the criteria for being money?
So tone policing and declaring I don't know what I'm talking about with zero argumentation? Good job, that's very High IQ of you. You totally don't sound like a Karen.
4chan idiot not knowing how money works. Owning stuff and holding money isn't an either/or. Money serves a specific function that commodities can't serve. Maybe learn economics 101.
Europeans become too lazy and arrogant to even think about mining absolutely everything they need for their industry and wealth by themselves. They think somebody should provide them all that stuff for their colored paper and they will teach everybody around about how to live and what to think.
Do you really believe this horseshit? As if "Europeans" is an entity of its own that gets to make such plans or the common European suddenly woke up and decided he doesn't like mining resources anymore.
What happened is the post WWII Montagu and Kalergi (both jewish) plans which partitioned and zoned Europe. Europe is in reality a vasal territory of the Anglo-American establishment. I thought people here know the rule of thumb that major changes in the economy, culture and society like this don't happen randomly but are engineered from above, even if one isn't familiar with the particular agenda behind the events.
I don't capitalize colors because that's not how English works.
I'm not even saying races are equal or that immigration should be a thing. All of this is valid but there surely are better arguments for being opposed to globohomo white genocide than a bunch of niggers stoning an old woman to death.
Is this Oprah? Emotional bs. People are capable of this regardless of race.
Low IQ take that disregards basic history and geopolitics. The war is for NATO/Anglo-American Establishment NWO hegemony. The historic enemies to this establishment are Germany and Russia. They took care of Germany in WWII and since then they've been trying to get rid of Russia.
China emerged later in the game but they know how dependent they are on the West, so they leverage that weakness by sticking closer to Russia. They play both sides really.
Sure, one of the goals for the war, just like any war, is to redistribute wealth and shift Europe from an industrial economy to a net zero circular economy. Russia's not in on this though.
What's intellect in your worldview? A function of the brain i.e. a mechanical process which is also governed by cause and effect determination? Uh oh...
Just because a mechanism is complex it doesn't follow it transcends it's existence as a pure mechanism. No wonder transhumanist idiots believe "AI will become conscious". This is Pinocchio level bs and those same retards have the nerve talking about sky daddies and fairy tales.
Don't weasel away now. I grant you Christianity is false for the sake of the argument. How does that change anything for you?
That's true. But I bet the aluminum in regular vaccines is great for the newborn baby.