How does newton's 3rd law dismiss my claims?
Because you're too stupid to do your own research and figure it out. Please just kill yourself and spare us from having to be witness to your idiocy. You don't understand or know how any of this works, yet you claim something is impossible. This is the definition of 'fuck wit'.
Ever since we have been exploring the lofty heights of mountains as well as the canyons, we have found evidence of ocean life.
Yeah, it's called tectonic plate movement. Look it up.
joining that discussion to be dismissive and combative is just plain ignorant.
Not when your opponent is a fuck-wit moron. The amount of overt stupid in this forum is painful. No mercy.
Don't be a fuck wit, you can try this yourself; https://youtu.be/MbucRPiL92Q?t=22
one must ask where exactly did the water come from?
A plausible biblical 'great flood' theory is that the Black Sea had a land bridge at the now open end which cracked and flooded the once fertile valley.
So maybe avoid taking things so literally.
Gravity is the idea that two objects attract each other, something that has not been proven.
Don't be a fuck wit and say things you don't know if it's true or not. An electron microscope can show you atoms being attracted to larger groups of atoms. Also this; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ym6nlwvQZnE
Moon having any sort of influence over tidal waves, is not proven,
Yes, it has dip shit. Even a child knows the moon's effect on earth's tides.
as tidal waves work independent on the position of the moon, and does not affect lakes.
Jesus, you're fucking dumb and gay. The great lakes have ~ 5cm tide
And you do not need gravity to explain why a object falls, people been able to do that using buoyancy and density before someone made up gravity to explain what is apparent.
Whatever, dip shit. You know fuck all. Go read some books.
pilot would have to decend
Both satellites and planes orbit our ball because gravity makes them constantly fall the to centre. FE map would require them both to constantly be turning. A satellite's path would be a big circular arc requiring energy (course correction) and not a straight path which you can see them doing with your own eyes at night.
A friend of mine in the navy circumnavigated the south pole clockwise, the coastline ahead was always turning to their right as they made course correction to the right, your map would require them to always be turning left. I can send photos.
Face it, you FE's are fucking stupid, make no sense and have no common sense. You just fabricate shit up to make you look 'edgy' but really, it's all just a bunch of low-IQ garbage. I'm done with you. Good luck, and please don't have children.
Have you even looked at a map of it?
yeah, it's fucking stupid, just like you. In a flat model, you would constantly have to be turning to get anywhere so flying from South America to Australia, for example, would take way more hours than it really does. The whole idea is retarded and not supported by anyone with any formal education. Your team is comprised of morons and idiots and no one smart. Your side can't explain anything properly without claiming 'illuminate' this or 'we're in a projection' or some other simpleton statement. Seriously, if you actually studied instead of watching YouTube for your facts, you might get it.
I'll take "Useless trivia" for $400 Alex.