No shit, Sherlock. This is why rockets use jet propulsion to move around in space. If only you paid attention in school. Think how less of a retard you would sound.
Space is a vacuum, hence no atmosphere. Combustion can't occure without oxygen. Even if the fuel has an oxidizer included (it doesnt) experiments show that combustion is still impossible.
Also rockets have flukes on them so they can fly straight or steer in an atmosphere. How do you control a rocket if there is no atmosphere/aerodynamics? Keep saying this until it sinks in.
what if i told you...space has oxygen but VERY VERY little to the point it can't become enriched so you can breathe.
mindblown
why dont you pick up a science book instead of spewing bulllshit. you have no idea what you are talking about. all of you flat earthers use the SAME bullshit talking points every single time. i know they are big words and they sound fancy because it makes it look like you know what you are talking about. But i can assure you , you don't
I am aware space has sparce molecules and atoms, what makes you think this is enough to maintain aerodynamics? This makes zero sense to me. Even simulated vacuums on earth, which are much less void than space, you can drop a feather as fast as a rock because there is just not enough air resistance on the feather. How does a rocket stay in control in space which is even more of a void?
I'm claiming combustion and thrust is not possible in the vacuum of space, and the rocket would spin out of control as earths atmosphere became thinner and thinner. How does newton's 3rd law dismiss my claims?
Because you're too stupid to do your own research and figure it out. Please just kill yourself and spare us from having to be witness to your idiocy. You don't understand or know how any of this works, yet you claim something is impossible. This is the definition of 'fuck wit'.
I mean, I'm all for things being a hoax - but if you are going to claim that we have managed a whole lot of rocket thrust in a rarified environment, like to the space station, putting satellites into orbit, and getting to the moon and back, a) without rockets and b) with some sort of fancy technology.....I'm going to need to see your evidence that shows any of those claims to be anywhere close to the truth.
Just screaming into the void that everything is fake doesnt work any better than those that scream into the void that everything is true.
No shit, Sherlock. This is why rockets use jet propulsion to move around in space. If only you paid attention in school. Think how less of a retard you would sound.
Space is a vacuum, hence no atmosphere. Combustion can't occure without oxygen. Even if the fuel has an oxidizer included (it doesnt) experiments show that combustion is still impossible.
Also rockets have flukes on them so they can fly straight or steer in an atmosphere. How do you control a rocket if there is no atmosphere/aerodynamics? Keep saying this until it sinks in.
what if i told you...space has oxygen but VERY VERY little to the point it can't become enriched so you can breathe.
mindblown
why dont you pick up a science book instead of spewing bulllshit. you have no idea what you are talking about. all of you flat earthers use the SAME bullshit talking points every single time. i know they are big words and they sound fancy because it makes it look like you know what you are talking about. But i can assure you , you don't
I am aware space has sparce molecules and atoms, what makes you think this is enough to maintain aerodynamics? This makes zero sense to me. Even simulated vacuums on earth, which are much less void than space, you can drop a feather as fast as a rock because there is just not enough air resistance on the feather. How does a rocket stay in control in space which is even more of a void?
Google; Newton's third law. The problem of arguing with morons is they're morons.
I'm claiming combustion and thrust is not possible in the vacuum of space, and the rocket would spin out of control as earths atmosphere became thinner and thinner. How does newton's 3rd law dismiss my claims?
Because you're too stupid to do your own research and figure it out. Please just kill yourself and spare us from having to be witness to your idiocy. You don't understand or know how any of this works, yet you claim something is impossible. This is the definition of 'fuck wit'.
Which experiments?
THE experiments!
I mean, I'm all for things being a hoax - but if you are going to claim that we have managed a whole lot of rocket thrust in a rarified environment, like to the space station, putting satellites into orbit, and getting to the moon and back, a) without rockets and b) with some sort of fancy technology.....I'm going to need to see your evidence that shows any of those claims to be anywhere close to the truth.
Just screaming into the void that everything is fake doesnt work any better than those that scream into the void that everything is true.