It doesn’t matter if people are out looking for Bigfoot. Bigfoot can hear us coming, they can see us coming and it’s very likely that they can feel is coming.
They have enough natural intelligence so that, if they don’t want to be seen, they won’t be seen.
Even an experienced hunter is simply a “babe in the woods” compared to an intelligent hominoid adapted to living in the wilds.
You’ve given me a simple denial yet you have no logical explanation for that denial. Let me show you why:
For years, the same arguments used to dismiss UFO witnesses are the exact same arguments that people are using to dismiss the thousands of Bigfoot witnesses every single year.
-
A person who claims to have a UFO or Bigfoot experience is not an expert witness and therefore they probably saw a bear or a shooting star.
-
A person who claims to see a UFO or a Bigfoot is lying in order to get attention or perhaps to write a book and earn money.
-
A person who claims to see a UFO or a Bigfoot has no hard evidence, all they have is an anecdotal story of their experience.
-
If the person has some physical evidence, that evidence is either of very poor quality (blurry photo or video) or they probably fabricated the evidence.
Again, these WERE the typical arguments used to dismiss 100% of UFO witnesses. These arguments ARE still being used to dismiss 100% of Bigfoot witnesses.
So, the fact that the US government is admitting that they don’t know what UFOs are is evidence that some of the people who witnessed the similar objects in the past we’re not lying.
Let me give you another chance to answer the question. Despite the fact that the US government is now bringing out information about UFOs do you believe that each and every non-military witness from the past was lying?
Yes or no?
If yes, then did the UFOs only arrive to earth about 10 years ago and have they only revealed themselves to the military? Is that what you believe?
If no, then you are admitting that some of the witnesses from the past did see unidentified flying objects of unknown origin. They were not lying or mistaken.
So now I want you to explain why we should believe some of the UFO witnesses but we should not believe any of the Bigfoot witnesses.
I want you to come up with a specific logical argument or explanation for why only 100% of Bigfoot witnesses are wrong or lying.
I’ve given you four typical arguments that people use. But if you can’t use those arguments against 100% of UFO witnesses then you can’t use those arguments against 100% of Bigfoot witnesses.
Thousands of people have Bigfoot experiences every single year.
Some of those incidents are reported and you can hear a lot of them on various Bigfoot channels on YouTube but I’m betting that the majority of witnesses don’t talk about it because they don’t want to be ridiculed.
If aliens were here last year, then they were here 100 years ago. If they were here 100 years ago, then they were probably here thousands of years ago.
Did the aliens bring robots to dig up any of resources that they needed. No, we haven’t found any robots in the fossil record, and there are few descriptions of robot type beings in ancient texts. According to the heretical, biblical book of Enoch, the “gods” simply took a low level primate and modified it into a smart tool user. Tool users like us humans can do things like dig up gold.
At the same time, perhaps the same or other aliens wanted a stronger human slave, and so they could have created Bigfoot too. Or, some ancient books say that the ancient gods mated with humans which created giant offspring. Anyhow, once we have a good genomic data set on Bigfoot we can compare their DNA to our own DNA and help us answer the question: Who the hell are we?
Most people don’t know that before the invention of currency and the spread of banks, the predominant economic model throughout the world was slavery.
Once we start teaching all children that we, humans, were genetically modified primates designed to be slaves, it’s going to make it more difficult for the global elites to control us.
I haven’t watched cable TV or cable news in years.
That’s maybe why I have been able to reconnect to my common sense.
The extent to which all of us have been programmed by entertainment, mass media and state education is massive.
However I’m happy to see that sometime all you need is some simple logic to defeat some of this programming.
It is possible that the tweet and this post about it may have been done by an actual morons.
I’m not gonna debate whether the Chinese are faking any part of their space program but the evidence presented above is not evidence of that. Like the comment above stated, this craft video is a computer simulation of telemetry data taken from the actual lander.
However, I think that these types of posts are more likely products of a disinformation agents whose job it is the seed doubt about everything.
After the original posting is done other paid commenters come in and raise additional doubts about things like the moon landing.
Later on other agents may come here and take screen grabs of the original post and its comments and then portray this as a typical conversation that occurs in the dot.win the community.
The whole purpose of this disinformation effort is to confuse and discredit this community.
I am sure the Bible does state that but which Bible? The Old Testament, New Testament, Torah? Koran?
In any case, your typical left-winger or new-ager simply ignores the bible. I am trying to use a somewhat rational argument to persuade them.
I think eventually, science will prove many that spiritual beliefs are true. Many things in the Bible will be proven out but not everything in the bible will be proven true. Additionally, there are heretical books left out of the bible that also contain some truth. If you want to better understand the origin of modern man, read the Book of Enoch. In it, you see that it was probably the "gods" and not God that modified our DNA in order to create a slave race of tool using hominoids.
What we all need to do is develop our spiritual antenna and our sense of right and wrong. Occasionally, when someone mis-uses the bible to fuel hate, we need to watch out for that. However, my main point is that spiritual disinformation coming from the entities within spiritual dimensions is potentially harmful.
Finally, anyone experimenting with "spirit molecules" in things like DMT or hallucinogenic mushroom needs to be in a good place with God before they dive in. A strong foundation in Christian prayer is not a bad starting point. There is a lot of testimony on how people are protected from demonic entities after calling out for God's help.
Here is my favorite prayer that protects me from the terrors of the night. If you use it and believe it, you are likely to feel the power of God move through you.
“God I put myself under your protection. As long as I have faith in you, no harm can come to me.”
This database is amazing, however I do have a warning.
I totally agree with the idea that there is a level of spiritual existence that isn’t obvious to our regular senses and can’t be measured with our current technology.
Experiences like near death experiences, astral projection and DMT trip experiences have been documented and seem to overlap and for me this verifies the existence of astral/spiritual dimensions.
When looking at a collection of knowledge on spirituality, it’s important to realize that not all the entities that exist in the spiritual realm are going to be communicating the truth to us.
Spiritual disinformation is a very real phenomenon. Some of the people who write spiritual books are channeling spiritual knowledge directly from higher level entities. Some of these entities are demons and tricksters and they are feeding us a narrative that benefits them or amuses them in some way.
I can’t tell you what’s true or not true, all I can do is tell you to be careful of what you read and what you practice.
We must blame China because we know that it’s not the Jews who actually hold a disproportionate number of the powerful jobs in Hollywood, the music industry and mass media.
Believing that would be anti-semetic, so let’s start a war with China instead.
They should have specifically stated that EAST Asians have a higher measurable IQ. Taken as a whole all Asians do NOT have a higher average IQ than caucasians.
When I say East Asians, I am referring only to Japanese, South Koreans Taiwanese and Chinese. The measurement numbers for IQ in Japan and South Korea are very credible. Is there a different between the IQs of urbanized Chinese and the rural Chinese living further west? Yes, some of that difference can be explained by greater educational opportunities in the richer, more urbanized parts of Eastern China.
In the US, South Asians from India do have higher IQs but this groups of Indians are self-selected for a higher IQ. Indian migrants are ambitious, they understood that the best universities are in the US and they often migrate to seek educational and work opportunities not available in India. Poor uneducated Indians cannot just walk across the US southern border in the way that Central and South Americans can.
I’m not gonna disagree with you about the wisdom of labeling a two-year-old as a genius. Obviously the child is not asking for that label, it’s the parents. That type of label can put a lot of pressure on a kid.
When I was a kid, schools wouldn’t tell children if they achieved or or didn’t achieve a high IQ score on a standardized test.
Of course, in high school you kind of start figuring it out once you start taking tests like the SAT.
Some people don’t seem to understand the measurement of IQ. Your IQ is relative to your age group. When they put a two-year-old in Mensa, it doesn’t mean that the two-year-old is smarter than you. What it means is that that two year old is smarter than 98% of other two-year-olds.
Given that, I’m not sure what kind of standardized IQ tests are available for two—year-olds. However if a two year old is reading books, doing math, speaking multiple languages etc. you can assume they’re in the top 2% of two-year-olds.
There are crap tons of photos of the end videos of UFOs right? Of course for you the quality of those photos or video was not good enough and you’re assumed that most of them were produced with Photoshop anyway, correct? So it’s very likely that in the recent past you did not believe in UFOs, you doubted all the witnesses to UFO photos and felt that the evidence was not strong enough, correct?
What’s that? The U.S. Navy says that UFOs are un-identifiable objects in with no known origin?
Oh, so now maybe some of those blurry pictures may have been real, right?
There are a crap ton of photos of Bigfoot, but the mass media usually doesn’t publish them.
Have you seen the most famous film of Bigfoot, the Patterson-Gimli film? It is a color film from the late 60’s taken by two cowboys. That film is very credible except for the fact that it seems to support the hypothesis that Bigfoot is more of a gorilla type animal. I am one of the few people who think that the film could be disinformation. But just because I think one famous film is disinformation doesn’t mean that all I think that all the other evidence is moot.
Of course if you looked up all of the videos or photos, you would say that they were all too blurry or that they were faked, correct? In fact some of the photos are fake. There are a few losers out there who are after money or attention. And some of the photos are faked on purpose and put out as disinformation in order to create the idea that all the photos are fake.
But see here’s what you have to do: You have to prove that 100% of the witnesses are wrong and that 100% of the physical evidence is fake. ONLY proving that 90% of the witnesses are wrong or that only 90% of the evidence is fake proves that Bigfoot is real.
If 10% of the witnesses are telling the truth and 10% of the foot prints are real and 10% of the big foot hair is real and 10% of the photos are not photoshopped fakes, well them, that proves that Bigfoot is real and that some people have been trying to cover it up with disinformation.
Oh and in the cases where people don’t take photos of Bigfoot, there’s a reason for that. Before or during many non-visual encounters where people hear the howls or the footsteps of Bigfoot, people describing how they felt they were being watched. Maybe for the first time in their lives, those people are experiencing their sixth sense. Most humans aren’t connected to the sixth sense but from all the anecdotes I’ve heard, it seems like Bigfoot have full control over their sixth sense and so they have the ability to project fear into humans.
Many Bigfoot encounters involve people experiencing the greatest amount of fear in their life whether they actually witness Bigfoot clearly or not. In those instances where people actually see a Bigfoot, they are feeling so much fear that they either forget to or are unable to take out their cameras or smart phones because they’re too busy literally crapping their pants and running away.
You know, if I’m just some dip-shit making up a Bigfoot encounter story to get attention, it’s going to end with me using my kung fu skills to beat up the Bigfoot so badly that it runs away from me. I’m not gonna make up a story where I heard some footsteps, saw a Bigfoot’s shadow, crapped my pants and then ran back to my car. I don’t look so heroic in that story, do I? But there’s a crap ton of stories like that.