1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

The goat or ram in of itself is not a bad thing. Mother's feed their children goats milk, and the lamb is to be eaten at sacrifice.

Just don't worship it, nor anthropomorphize it into an effigy of man.

5
Questionable 5 points ago +5 / -0

No. Changing one factor doesn't mean the other does not exist.

But, what it would do, is hide the stars. As there is something wrong with the nights sky, and there always has been.

No matter the season we have only one nights sky, regardless to your location on this planet. At least in the area we are allowed to exist that is.

3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

I find your character lacking.

by DrLeaks
4
Questionable 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, destroying the constitution is a bad thing.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

I clearly can not 'ignore' the sun dial and it's position in relation to the light source, when it is the entire premise your thread and arguments are based on. Ignore the sun dial, look at t he shadows? Makes no sense.

As I've said before in my other reply. Don't pay attention to the sun, look to the stars.

Watched that entire 5 hour video you did? Did that happen in the last 2 hours since I posted it?

the geometry seem very clear to me.

Such an unfounded and meaningless statement. Allow me such hollow parlance in return.

The righteousness of being good is very apparent to me.

Meaningless.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

The light source has been placed above Georgia. This is not possible on any Earth Model. Not even flat Earth. Which is how you should know that this is controlled opposition.

Buckle up Buttercup. Because you're about to go on a ride.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/QetnEQ2pszMr/

by DrLeaks
2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

The main character and leader of the cult is actually against all the cult represents, and intends on changing the order. Lets see if they stick to this premise or if it's a single episode plot that is quickly dropped.

Other than that, this trailer is like a pie to the face. Screaming goats?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are a simple man. Normally I mean that as a compliment. You should not take it as such.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Backdoor to control the cotton market. Simple but effective.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm fairly certain it is some A.I generated bullshit. But, it's the only sort of info search results return now. And no one here will listen to other's statement's and will demand links.

3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

None of the permanent sun dial fixtures in my city are adjustable.

But, this is a controlled opposition talking point. As Noon is not determined by angle but by daylight, as the length of the day accounts for positional changes over the time of the year. Therefore, the sunlight doesn't come from four distinct directions, but will always be facing the same direction, regardless of position on horizon. It's not noon at midnight during the winter as apposed to summer is it? No, of course not. That would be silly. The tilt is the misdirection in this ploy. As it always has been.

Now the starscape. That will face 4 distinct directions, and should be a panorama of new stars arriving on the nightly.

In short. Learn to recognize controlled opposition. A visualization of third dimensional space, and movements through time will aid you in doing so.

In addition. The light is above the equator on this model. Positioned in line with the sun dial, where as the tilt will NOT cause the shadow to change directions, as it will always be below the sun dial located in the State of Georgia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropic_of_Cancer

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/earths-axis-has-changed--422845852487350185/

3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

How can you tell if something is inverted or right-side up? The easy way is by drawing lines from each point on both versions of the symbol. If they touch at one end or form a straight line when connected, then you have an inverted five-pointed star—and not just any five-pointed star but one that carries negative energy and serves as visual evidence of someone’s allegiance with Satan.

Or in short, no straight lines, not an inverted pentagram. Army is closest, but the lines still do not connect.

https://symbolhippo.com/pentagram-vs-5-pointed-star/

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

What? You're telling me that my H.I.V positive Emo-Satan worshiping neo nazi heroin addicted white supremacist ex-prostitute ex-runaway ex-girlfriend that tricked me into moving in with her, because she wanted to have someone to help pay her grandfather's bills, and then disappeared for 2 weeks and came back with an ex-con on her arm, with a neck tattoo of his own throat being torn out, and a 5th of JD, and promptly dumped me after only giving me a blowy, and later took to sleeping in a coffin and moved her homosexual male needle sharing buddy into the basement, had bad taste in music????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Preposterous!!!!!!!!!!

How about this one?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNchTKdRs2A

♡̙̫̦̣̻̘͇͉͚͓ ̜

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQR78U6zvGI

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually I just read your text verbatim. Without conjecture or inference. You should try typing out actual sentences, and not just fragments connected to the feelings, and thoughts in your own mind. That way others can understand what you are trying to portray to them, and not have to guess if you are a member of a 'joke of the day email' service.

Fucking clown.

OH, I get it now. You were telling me that you 'were fucking a clown while typing that'. I should have asked, "So you are fucking a clown right now?" and not, "So you're a fucking clown"?

Let me know if you have any other mood other than 'fecal tossing". Get back to me once you stop being so emotional. O.K?

32 whole letter! Count them baby!

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you're a fucking clown? Got it.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

You carry so much water. It weighs heavy upon your soul.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

So. Only doom and gloom allowed? Gosh, these rules are so complex, and only support your pity party for some reason.

Honestly, I can't debate anything with you. You'd just label it " hopium/copium".

hopium/copium doesnt work here...

Clearly nothing works with you. You are of a singular unchanging mindset.

Here you go:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rmAi9XmlIo

Put it on repeat and lay about your bed all day, thinking of dying swans, or some other played out tropes.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

So were you attempting to support Zelensky the Nazi at The Great Awakening?

What a Quagmire!

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

The socialist party of Germany? They tried to appease the central banks through war, instead of going to war with the bankers. In short, they did nothing right. And it is too much of a quagmire for a mod to even attempt to go over with you in txt chat format.

Now take the above premise, apply it to modern times, and you can debate that. That would have made a good thread. As for the concept of """"Nazi""""? You might have well made a thread entitled The boogie man did nothing wrong, or any other vague concept without definition. Or how about.... '

Niggers did nothing wrong. Change my mind.

Jews did nothing wrong change my mind.

Spics, spics, spics and boners.

The definition of porn, is that of indecency being put on public display.

That was a public forum. You were not asking for genuine debate, as none can be had from that title.

by pkvi
1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe your statement is in error. As you never grew up.

by pkvi
2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

You like crayons.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

That wasn't a "fact checker". It was from a forum.

https://www.metabunk.org/threads/explained-video-of-pilot-showing-off-chemtrail-plane-prank-video.12964/

With extensive links and photos.

It's called controlled opposition. And we don't push it or promote it here.

https://www.concordaerospace.com/products/chemtrails-switch

Or do we? You tell me.

"............."

Am I to debate that? No.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›