Amazing. It took you 6 hours, but you figured it out.
Now neither Question results in explicitly mentioning the degree of tilt.
Which is a notable improvement over your belief that I can click on images I edited into a clearly pieced together comparison. Though you really do need to work on addressing the topic, and not whatever preconeived notions you seem so hung up on.
I will try and do better spell checking in spite of my impending blindness.
Awesome. Now do they, or anyone, have any images of Earth from Moon orbit?
Right. So the box that I added, showing that the correct information is only shown while asking a Question with a miss-spelling proves that I have a low IQ. Amazing.
From your response, I can assume that we both agree that a video showing the sun traveling parallel to the horizon is impossible.
Now that, that is out of the way. Do you care to speculate on why simple information is being hidden from people that use correct spelling?
The red underline that I added in photo edit is telling me that my grammar sucks? What does the second red underline mean, or how about the red box?
In the above example; Artificial Intelligence chooses to give you the wrong answer for spelling words correctly.
Amazing. Let's pretend that you care what the original argument was over:
As he had clearly posted a fake video supporting his theory, In which the sun was shown traveling in a loop that was paralel to the Earth's surface. But I'm the retard here.
Note: The A.I seems to only mention the Axial tilt if I misspell the word "parallel" as "paralel".
Fun fact: I am in no way associated with the Q movement, and u/catsfive banned me from his site for an argument I had here with u/clemaneuverers in HIS flat Earth thread.
"Indeed I did, you just have little memory."
I don't need a good memory. I have a text log of our conversation.
"That's ok, fraud is cool."
Strange admission. But, I have no choice other than to allow it.
In the future. Do better. As for my charade, I shall now stop perpetrating 'the charade' for which I am accused of. It ends now. Done.
You didn't ask for me to explain myself, you told me to 'give up the charade'. Explanation: What I am currently doing, is trying to get you to tell me what 'charade' I am perpetrating. Upon receiving this explanation, I will most dutifully 'give it up', dude.
O.K. And what 'charade' am I perpetrating? Be specific, or else I might think you are not capable of explaining yourself. AKA: mistake you for a retard.
O.K. Just explain what it is that I am to give up.
- Electric vehicles are a leftist agenda.
- You didn't show us how it started.
give up what?
Hustler Magazine most likely.
The Gemstone File is a ππ page document written by a man named Bruce Roberts, who purportedly was connected to a group of elites who ran the world. It covers the "hidden history" of almost every major event from the 1950s through the 1970s, including the death of JFK, the Howard Hughes disappearance, Watergate, and more.
β.
Keep your head on a swivel.
He's just juxtaposing concepts against each other, and then claiming cause and effect. There is no way of deconstructing his logic where none exists.
One can only speak for themselves.
I don't expect anything from you 'new user', and yet, somehow, you have still managed to disappoint me.
Stop being reactionary, and clarify the significance of your statement.
Other way around, then. Clowns probably look like "nephalim"
You made it after all.
the topic is; 'Why does the most accurate spelling show the least correct answer'. What don't you understand about that? I mean, you seemed to have already answered the Question for me. Yet you keep harping on about the example Question.
You:
???
Nothing. That makes perfect sense. As I have already stated 5 hours ago.
Try keeping up. I am slow and dumb after all.'