This is one of those places where "They" draw the line.
It's nothing specifically about Biden, it's that the general population cannot be allowed to know how things actually work. In the absence of that, everyone's mind will automatically fill in whatever makes them comfortable. If the subject ever comes up, the fact that no contradictory evidence is available is--incorrectly--taken to be confirmation.
Conspiracy theorists nearly universally consider the "Information War" to be something based entirely around "lies vs truth", but it actually includes numerous methodologies and techniques all aimed at keeping us away from the truth. The number is limited only by the imagination.
(Notice I didn't say "the human imagination"?)
The bigger problem is that a number of nations are being geared up as Fifth-Generation Warfare states for WW3.
The UK is one of them, but there are even bigger initiatives underway in Poland, Germany, the Baltic states, Finland, Moldova, and Romania. They just tried and failed to overthrow Georgia, right on Russia's doorstep.
The populations are awakening and struggling against this, but there's a different battle in every country. The end of the war in Ukraine and the reelection of Trump will certainly change the scenario significantly--and hopefully for the better--but the situation is chaotic and thus unpredictable.
Very little of this has anything to do with Jews. "They" use whatever agents and puppets are convenient. This is a business plan, for which religious or ethnic supremacy or anything other nonsense like that is used simply as a lever of power.
The issues about the income tax were brought up in "America: Freedom to Fascism" when (somehow) Aaron Russo got an interview with the IRS Director.
Before the guy just ran away, he was reduced to saying something like, "Just try not paying your taxes and see what happens." When people say the government is the largest criminal organization ever to have existed, there's your proof.
Here's one where I was surprised they didn't just invent some lie about:
Usermontu's Knee Screw Baffles Experts: 2,600-Year-Old Medical Marvel (Ancient Origins 6/17/2024)
I even went so far as to check his wiki page and, yes, they admit it there too.
Their spin, though, is that it was inserted after death by the mummifiers to preserve the integrity of the body. Really? The same people that take out your innards and put them in jars were worried about a prosthetic pin?
Homicidal ideation is a symptom of psychosis.
I'm not saying that as some sort of clever slam but just pointing out the situation. Millions upon millions of people are literally suffering from psychosis but the "medical establishment" has never noticed.
This actually highlights the way the vast majority of human beings think.
The normies have their Truth handed down to them from the pulpit or the TV screen. The next level up, which includes most "conspiracy theorists", selects their Truth like glossy magazines off a rack. As we see here, TPTB even create the magazines and put them on the shelf for our convenience.
In either case, the facts will precisely match what that person already believed they were correct about, so there is never any need to inquire further. That would just make them uncomfortable.
The thing is, here we are a century later and the basic issue still persists, maybe even worse. As Gilad Atzmon pointed out, "Jewishness" is either a religion, an ethnicity, or a nationality... as convenient to the Jewish Power, of course.
Einstein (a Jew of some type or other) said, "No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it." When we look around, we can see that virtually zero people ask, "When you say 'Jew', are you referring to a religion, an ethnicity, or a nationality?" We could get a long way by getting people just to ask that question.
I've often wondered how many times "They" have kicked themselves for not just setting off a tactical nuke at Trump's inauguration. Simple enough and think of all the trouble They would have saved. They could blame it on anyone convenient, or change it to anyone inconvenient in the future. Like J6, but not total nonsense.
Actually, even before that, the election results were so hotly contested that I thought the smart move for Osama would have been to say, "Listen, this is too important and we have to get this sorted out, so we're going to do it again next November." Most people would have gone along with it and far, far more out-of-bounds and unprecedented actions have taken place since then.
I believe there are two lessons here:
One is that "They" are not infallible. They do not have a time machine or a crystal ball. They make bad decisions and suffer setbacks all the time, and a priority is that we are never conscious of this.
The other is that "They" have been off-balance for years due to these bad decisions and setbacks. "They" are growing more desperate by the day, and reacting with whatever they can get their hands on.
Such a situation is chaotic, and thus it is literally unpredictable. We should all hope for the best.
If you're interested in the historicity (as they term it) of Noah's Flood, you may be interested in this:
A few years ago I read a book called "Gods of the New Millennium" by Alan Alford, published in 1999. Just as one tiny part of it, he attempts to date the Flood using a genealogy of patriarchs given in the Bible, starting with a generally accepted year of birth for with Abraham and backing up to Noah.
He observed, though, that the ages at which the men had their sons seemed to be off, being in their late 20's or early 30's, which is fairly late even these days. He surmised that over the immense time span, transcribers had monkeyed with the ages in two ways. First, they had misunderstood numbers written in the Sumerian sexagesimal system (base 60) as decimal. Later, others had thought the high numbers unreasonable and "corrected" them by dividing by a factor of what he believed was five.
Alford undoes these "fixes", adds up the ages, and comes up with a date of 10983 BC for the Flood. Sound familiar? That's pretty much exactly the date of the suspected Younger Dryas Impact, causing huge climatic changes and including a sea level rise of 400 feet. Sounds like we have our Flood!
Alford never mentions the Younger Dryas, the associated Impact Hypothesis, or Meltwater Pulse 1B. I think he was entirely ignorant of these and I believe much of the research had not yet been done. Yet there he is hitting the unknown target dead bullseye.
So then you flip it back around and see that the story of Noah's Flood has been handed down for 13,000 years, starting with people that were basically Stone Age. It makes you give that story a lot of leeway considering, you know, maybe some of the fine details might have gotten changed along the way... lol
Oh, I don't at all think it's the inspired word of a divine being.
Nor is it what we might consider the opposite: pure fiction. It's filled with details and holes and bizarre oddities that no one writing a fairy story would ever include. Open it up to a random place, read a few sentences, and ask yourself why the proposed "fiction author" would have put those there.
The Bible--and many other such ancient works--are what they appear to be on the surface: collections of writings considered important enough to be passed down over centuries and millennia.
However, it all comes with the world's biggest asterisk. The narratives were subjected to all manner of forces which would distort them, and it is incredibly difficult to undo that distortion and reveal the information contained and transmitted down to us.
But when you do, I think of this analogy: On one side of town you find a complicated key, and on the other side of town you find a fancy box with an elaborate lock. You find that the key opens the lock. What kind of person says, "Well, this is mere happenstance," and throws away the key and the box without examining it's contents?
It has to be properly decoded, carefully reverse engineering various corruptions, misunderstanding, rewritings, misperceptions, etc. Virtually no one is up to that task.
Those that aren't, though, are completely unaware of that fact and talk loud and with certainty about the Bible anyway.
We're living in an time when all bets are off, but I don't think it will be Newsom. He's been dead since early 2022. Not even kidding!
I've followed the issue very closely since then. He's even been reelected governor in a virtually non-existent campaign. But in all that time they have never--to my knowledge--rolled out a clone or body double or even a dude in a mask. It's all been a light touch with Deepfake and CGI, and what basically amounts to stage magic misdirection. The basic thing is that no one is looking and when they do, they see exactly what they expect to see.
I mean, I get that "Joe Biden" is not Joe Biden, so clearly they could pull it off, but it seems to me that Virtual President Newsom is a bridge too far even at this crazy point..
You know, I've thought along those lines but I've never been able to make a rigorous connection between the longheads and the Nephilim. Consider their typical characteristics:
Longheads: long skulls (obv) and tall but otherwise normal human bodies. Infrequently, the skulls have hair and it appears reddish. Apparently lived freely in community with humans.
Nephilim: giants, six fingers, six toes, double rows of teeth, red hair, often violent and cannibalistic, sometimes lived with humans but more often in separate and often hostile communities.
Not much overlap except for the red hair, which is very intriguing but far from conclusive. In years I've never stumbled across evidence as to what their real relationship might have been.
Also, there's the issue of beauty and it's standards. The Nephilim may have been big and powerful, but I don't think I've ever heard them described as beautiful.
Saul is described as "tov" and "bachur". Translations vary, but in any case I think he is being described as attractive. Well, today as in all times, beauty standards are set by the elites in society. Longheads burials have often indicated they were the elites of the day, so you see how it ties together that Saul had "movie star good looks".
In my view, we still have a mystery on our hands.
King Saul was one of these "longheads".
They try to disguise it with mistranslations as being "head and shoulders taller", but in earlier translations and tracing back to the original Hebrew we find in 1 Sam 9:
From his shoulders upward, he was taller than all the people.
Unless he had a real long neck, he must have had a real long head.
One can further infer that longheads were not exceptional at the time, since the Bible doesn't specifically note that. By analogy, one might note that a woman has real big boobs, but would not specifically note that she is a person with boobs since that is taken as literally unremarkable.
I hope I didn't offend anyone by talking about the Bible and boobs in the same comment.
As you say, indeed much is hidden from us, but in my analysis the end game is for all the marbles. That is, there's no running away, "safe" countries, parallel economies, opting out, etc, etc. We either win, or every single thing that could possibly be considered our own is taken from us, right down to our identities and our consciousness.
The alarming part is that it's all speeding up, as if a hidden clock is ticking down. I mean, it hasn't been going that well for TPTB lately, and a sensible strategy would be to pull back then let everyone cool off and go back to sleep, thinking they had "won".
But nope, it just keeps ratcheting up higher to a level I would have never believed if I told it to myself 5 years ago.
We don't need any more proof, but if you want to see how the mainstream shapes the news by sanding off the "rough edges", read the milquetoast paragraphs way down the page that Politico writes about the dissent, then compare that to this scorcher:
‘Blatantly Unconstitutional’: Justice Alito Writes Blistering Dissent In Biden Admin Censorship Case (Daily Caller via MSN 6/26/2024)
Justice Samuel Alito excoriated the Supreme Court majority for “shirk[ing]” its duty to restrain the government’s coercive censorship efforts in “one of the most important free speech cases” to reach the high court in years.
“Facebook’s responses resembled that of a subservient entity determined to stay in the good graces of a powerful taskmaster,” Alito wrote. “When criticized, Facebook representatives whimpered that they ‘thought we were doing a better job’ but promised to do more going forward…And when denounced as ‘killing people,’ Facebook responded by expressing a desire to ‘work together collaboratively’ with its accuser.”
Frankly, I never knew Sammy was so Fiery before. Doesn't look like it, does he?
BTW, didn't Mussolini have some term for state and corporate power working together collaboratively?
The October 7th is a subtle one. I don't look around a whole lot, but as far as I can tell no one has analyzed it succinctly and correctly. We're in real 5th-generation warfare territory so all reports have to be deconstructed and put in their proper context.
First, the background is important. In October 2012, Kissinger said that in ten years there would be no more Israel. Say what you want about him but he was sharp and well-informed. I'm not certain what he was basing that on, but apparently the path of the Zionist entity led to a cliff, and here we are.
Then there was a real crisis going on. The maniac criminal Netanyahu was barely dodging prison, and it was pretty clear that as soon as he left office that's where he would go. The backlash against the 2023 judicial reforms were causing civil disturbances bordering on insurrection. Civil war was in the air.
Clearly, any resistance group is just going to let them shake themselves apart. They know well that the death of the Zionist entity will not come in the form of a military victory and seizure of the central government, but when people call bullshit on the Zionist entity and are no longer interested in supporting it. More and more people were doing just that.
Then a war breaks out. How convenient, eh? But that context tells us how to pull apart the rest of the events.
Hamas is a hybrid organization and a 5GW weapon. It was supported by the Israeli government, so most of the leadership would have been agents, but the vast majority of the rank and file would be authentic resistance fighters.
"Operation Al Aqsa Flood" appears to have been a legitimate operational plan, but that's not all that went down that day and not even the important part. Netanyahu & Co., through control of elements of Hamas and elements of the IDF, bolted a big psyop on top and arranged for the LIHOP elements.
Authentic Hamas fighters running around doing legitimate resistance things according to the op just ended up being cover and concealment for the other operations going on that day: the nonsense music festival attack, non-existent paraglider troopers, kidnappings of old ladies and hot chicks, the list goes on.
There was a flurry of events that really happened, but then we're lied to about who and why. Suppose a family of 6 Jews got smoked in the own home due to "terrorism". Real resistance fighters have nothing to gain, obviously, so maybe it was 5GW Hamas moles or IDF dressed up as Hamas. Or maybe they admit it was the IDF but operating under the "Hannibal Directive". Again, all reports have to be carefully deconstructed.
And then everything is buried under an avalanche of black propaganda: civilians executed, babies beheaded and burned, mass rapes, etc. I have to inject here that there is a certain peculiarly Judaic mindset in dreaming this shit up that is sickening.
All along, the IDF and the militias are getting smoked and anyone sensible would have shut it all down long before now. But if you wrap back to the context, they have got to keep this thing going. They don't give a rat's ass about the hostages (assuming there are actually any real ones left) or a ceasefire. They want to attack Lebanon, and Hezbollah secretly wishes they would. They're going to draft the ultra-Orthodox, which is a ginormous red line. Also, if Trump gets into office, he's going to pull the plug. That's a long ways away but the clock is ticking.
It's just more chaotic by the day, and when you have chaos it's impossible to see how it's all going to shake out.
Well, that was pretty long! I feel like I just got something off my chest... lol
The whole shill thing is really coming off the chain lately, especially over on r/conspiracy.
Someone will post some fairly innocuous conspiracy, not spicy at all, and then there's a straight flood of a dozen "users" saying how dumb and crazy it is. Whatever subtlety there ever was is totally gone and now it's all about flooding the zone.
On the flip side, I notice that the shill narrative posts almost always get downvoted right to zero, so there are still a good number of people awake and aware.
I think "Loose Change" is taken to be the standard documentary. There are several versions on YouTube.
I've never watched it but I doubt they tell you the buildings were turned into dust by nukes. So the film can be considered--ultimately--disinformation, and that's precisely why they allow it on YouTube.
The vast majority of people will never believe they could set off nukes in Manhattan and lie about it for two and a half decades, so they're free to watch "Loose Change" while never getting to the ultimate truth.
All that being said, I would recommend it anyway because they have to give you enough actual truth that will at least get someone with an open mind to the point, "Okay, clearly the government was involved, and the official narrative of Muslims and boxcutters is bullshit."
Yeah, that's true, they really get stuck defending their delusions against all comers. Of course, once you have discovered the "truth", the first person who should question it is yourself.
Regrettably, I don't think it's courage that's the problem, or perhaps it should be said that it's not the root of it. I believe that it actually has to do with the level of consciousness of individuals.
There's a middle level, above the NPCs, where they can break from the accepted authority but end up just selecting another authority. From there, that new "truth" can be rationalized to any extent whatsoever.
I suppose it could look like a failure (or inability) to face up to the idea that, "Any authority could be wrong on any point, as could I." Seems like a simple thing but, as you say, few do it.