You realize it’s illegal to use public office (e.g., by firing and replacing the U.S. Attorney General) for personal gain, right?

Strange. Even when it’s straight from the horse’s mouth you still can’t believe Trump would do a no-no.

Don’t break the law, amirite?

There’s an old adage about not trying to drown an enemy that’s lighting itself on fire. It applies here.

My man seriously thinks he’s important enough for a personal Chinese bot. I reply to this stuff when I’m taking a shit dude

Say what you want man. All I know is I’m not the one typing paragraphs trying to rationalize why Putin is a reliable source.

So you don’t think Putin has an overriding objective to sow chaos in the American public. Got it.

Some conspiracy forum this is lol.

If you think Putin signed up for a televised, American interview to speak objective facts, then I’d maybe reconsider who’s twelve.

First, the First Amendment only protects you from the government impeding on your speech. Private citizens can judge them for the violent, anti-American losers they are.

Second:

rioting in the streets burning down cities and attacking people for thinking differently

— you mean like January 6th, Trump rallies, and mask protests?

Idk, everyone he seems to keep talking about how peaceful Trump supporters were — seems an awful lot like they care.

You know you’re on the wrong side when you’re siding with Putin lmfao

I’m gonna take this as a “yes, I did think states could enforce federal criminal law” lol

Sorry you can't selectively quote facts to fit your narrative love

You left the part out about this guy trying to poke someone else’s eye out…

Yeah, they can. They can also generally fire you if you refuse to answer.

Your healthcare employer is not asking for it because they’re a covered entity. If you don’t work in healthcare, you’re not a covered entity.

PII also literally includes things like your date of birth. The upshot of your argument is that an employer violates federal law by requiring an employee to give their birthday lol.

Look up covered entities when you get a chance. Unless you’re working in the health field, HIPAA almost certainly does not apply to your employer.

I’d drive a ‘67 GTO over a Tesla any day, chip shortage or not.

That’s not even remotely how HIPAA works.

Yup, it also applies to those employed “by any State.” Hence, Garland has jurisdiction.

Wait, please don’t tell me you thought Arizona could use the U.S. Code against Garland, right? If so, you really need to retake high school civics my man.

I’ve never trusted polls, but that doesn’t mean certain pollsters aren’t biased right.

Hey man, some people have to take what they can get. No worries, I don’t judge.

Lol, a Rasmussen poll. Might as well ask Trump himself to do the polling at that point.

Yes, let the ad hominem course through you.

Wow, you’re still really missing my point that much, huh?

To be clear, I asked you for specificity the supporting election fraud argument. All you could do was link pages that were effectively general data dumps. This is like printing a Wikipedia page for a high school essay.

I’m sorry, but do you not know what the USC is? That’s the U.S. Code. I.e., the crime you just sent is a federal crime — y’know, something that gives Garland federal jurisdiction.

I already know what the truth is. I think the audits are clearly stupid, partisan smoke shows, but I have no issue with people doing them. To do so, however, you have to comply with federal law. If your audit breaks the statute that you just cited — again, which is what Garland is talking about — then I truly question how much of an “audit” it really is.