Going through my old posts looking for something, saw this one from a couple years ago. I commented:
Asking the chatGPT about this stuff and getting strikes on my account.
In the chat it would say this.. "This content may violate our content policy. If you believe this to be in error, please submit your feedback — your input will aid our research in this area."
Again later.. it was making it snafu and as it's inquiring, it would be super slow.. and stop. It was hitting conflicts of interest.
Then I get emailed..
We are reaching out to you as a user of OpenAI’s ChatGPT because some of the requests associated with the email funturistic (my email) have been flagged by our systems to be in violation of our policies.
Please ensure you are using ChatGPT in accordance with our Terms of Use and our Usage Guidelines, as your access may be terminated if we detect further issues with your usage.
Best, The OpenAI team
If you have any questions please contact us through our help center"
Meanwhile it's saying this guy.. their idol.. was an actual pedophile. You do that stuff these days, you go to jail for a very long time.
That was the post.. but thinking about this these days.. wow.. anybody who's muslim.. this mohammed dude was an actual pedophile. wtf.. cause look at the percentage of the world population that's muslim. Let me check.
"Approximately 25.6% to 26% of the world's population was Muslim as of 2020-2025, representing about 2 billion people. The Muslim population is the fastest-growing religious group and is projected to continue increasing its share of the global population in the coming years."
That is fucked up, man. And then how about this picture somebody was posting on imgur of pride month mohammed.
I ask: are muslims allowed to be gay
It says: "No, according to traditional interpretations of Islam's sacred texts like the Qur'an and Hadith, homosexual acts are forbidden (haram). However, within the diverse global Muslim community, interpretations and practices vary, with some progressive Muslims and inclusive mosques recognizing and performing same-sex weddings, while many Muslim-majority countries legally prohibit homosexual acts, sometimes with severe penalties"
I don't think that gay shit is allowed in Iran, eh.. betcha they cut your dick off or something. So.. this pride month mohammed pic somebody did.. you could probably have them come after you like the France newspaper cartoon incident. Meanwhile.. the dude's an actual pedophile, and that's "ok". hmm.
Well, at least they don't like the gay thing. These days.. I go into the Scotiabank and they got the pride month flag on the wall. And if you say anything about hey.. sticking your dick in a shitty asshole.. that doesn't seem good. Like you can get sick fuckin around with poop. But if you say that on normal social networking, you'd have your fuckin years old account shut down.
But yeah.. this whole thing about mohammed being an actual pedophile.. that's fucked up. Factor in how many people are muslims.. whatever, man.
Going through my old posts looking for something. How about this one.
"Polio spreads from poop in the water. You don't catch it bad from airborne coughing like covid. Those numbers aren't gonna go up too much. They started polio injections 1955. This was the 20 years before. Polio cases go way up after they get injected for Diphtheria and Pertussis Vaccines."
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/16bihrmcZt/polio-spreads-from-poop-in-the-w/c
I comment:
Third world countries, they can get their water from a dirty river, where somebody else dumps their sewage, upstream.
This graph is from the US. How does this get going.. I don't know.. I guess once the disease gets out there, it spreads around and gets worse? I suppose so. What kind of dirty water was going on in the US during those years.
I don't know.. but those numbers were going up a bit there from 1935-39 to 1940-44.. I guess maybe almost doubling, right.. and it keeps going up. So who knows.
However.. you may get this "nefarious" possibility. These guys are pretty sadistic. What if that's how they got polio out there. Was putting it in the Diphtheria and Pertussis Vaccines. Like that's pretty crazy. But.. if you wanna do all this later vaccine agenda, that's how you get there. You get diseases going so they can provide the cures. I don't know.. this one's "out there".
Somebody replies:
Respect_Mah_Covfefe
2 points 2 years ago They changed the symptoms for Polio, to include inflammatory responses from other things, so that they would have an excuse to push out the polio vaccine. This is basically adverse reactions severely affecting key parts of the nervous system. Polio itself is mostly harmless, without a very poisonous envionment.
Also, the polio vaccine is the main cause, now, of genuine polio outbreaks.
Going through my old posts to try and find something.. I see this one, where I commented on somebody else's post.
Peru declares a state of emergency amid a rise in cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome, a rare autoimmune disease that attacks the human nervous system (everyone is baffled)
in NoNewNormal 2 years ago
Wondered how many numbers. Using the bing AI, then it can search now, unlike chatGPT that has this sept 2021 cut off.
"In the news.. "Peru declares a state of emergency amid a rise in cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome, ". How many cases are they getting?
Sent message. Searching for: Guillain-Barre syndrome cases in Peru
Generating answers for you…
According to the latest news reports, Peru has declared a state of health emergency due to an unusual increase in cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome, a rare neurological disorder that can cause paralysis1234. Since June 2023, Peru has reported 182 cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome; four patients have died1. The emergency will last for 90 days as officials grapple with the situation and try to improve patient care and prevention measures23.
Guillain-Barré Syndrome is a condition where the body’s immune system attacks its own peripheral nerves, causing muscle weakness, breathing difficulties, and sometimes total paralysis15. It often develops after a person gets an infectious disease, such as a bacterial or viral infection5. Some of the possible triggers include campylobacter, cytomegalovirus, Epstein Barr virus, Zika virus, and COVID-195.
Guillain-Barré Syndrome is very rare, affecting about one in 100,000 people worldwide5. It can affect anyone of any age, gender, or ethnicity. There is no cure for Guillain-Barré Syndrome, but treatments such as intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis can help reduce the severity and duration of the symptoms5. Most people recover from Guillain-Barré Syndrome within a few weeks or months, but some may have permanent nerve damage or disability5.
I hope this information was helpful. Do you have any other questions about Guillain-Barré Syndrome or Peru? 😊
Look, it put a "smile" after that. They like this shit, eh.
That was the post..
Peru, eh. Was just looking at my covid column spreadsheets and noticed Peru.
They were ranking #1 in deaths % of population from covid, 0.67%. But the vaxxed % of the population was high, 89.6%.
Here's the spreadsheet screenshot:
https://media.scored.co/post/kygIDodytp2n.jpeg
So.. I don't know.. but you had this odd illness after they get injected. This dying from the covid.. I guess that's "before" they got injected with the vaccine. I don't know.
Going through my old posts trying to find something. From a couple years ago so you had time for data to come in. I was analyzing the whole covid thing and did the vaccines help have less deaths of % of the population of a country.
This is where I got the data from:
Those are the data cut off dates. Countries stopped reporting and it drops off in the map if you move the slider right.
This data is all from this official site.
This is your peak around spring 2022. You can go to "table" tab to see text data. That column where I get the dates and the percentage of that country which was vaccinated for covid.
I use notepad++ where you hold the alt key and can select text vertically. Then using "sheets" in google, where top right with the icons you scroll down to sheets and it's like a spreadsheet with boxes. Pasting vertical copied stuff it goes properly in the boxes going down.
For the death data from covid, got that from here.
https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
This is where you have all kinds of subsets of the data you can choose from. Your "metric" on the top you click that drop-down menu and choose what data you want showing up. I went to "confirmed deaths". Then you choose your "interval" from that drop down menu at the top, beside it. Went to "cumulative", I guess that means total deaths from covid since they started gathering data. This 'll be a chart, but you go to the tab at the bottom of the chart for "table", where you get columns of text for that info. You can sort by country on the left.. This is "total deaths". Then I'd copy all the text in there and paste in notepad++. Then select just the column of total deaths up to Aug 16, 2023. Paste that column in the google "sheets" program window.
Then I'd get the data of countries populations. In sheets can sort columns, but I had this column where I put numbers from 1-218 so I could re-sort it back that way. It was sorted by most vaxxed for covid, percentage. Sorted the countries alphabetically, copied that order, pasted in chatGPT, got it to name the country and population. Double checked that those were correct. Made column of population. Then I got chatGPT to calculate the death percentage of population. I pasted those 3 columns of country name, population and deaths from covid columns. And it calculated the death percentage. Doubled checked the data.. you'd take deaths, divide by population, then multiply by 100. Double check that by taking the population and multiplying it by the death percentage number. Data seemed correct.
In the:
https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
They do not have this death percentage of the population data. They're trying to hide stuff, eh. That's why I wanted to do this spread sheet where I can see what the numbers are, beside each other.
Then I made a spreadsheet with these columns and you can click each one to sort it that way. These were the columns:
Rank for % vax. Country or region. Latest data. Population. Vax % of pop. Deaths from Covid. Death % of pop.
Then I did 4 posts where I'd sort things different ways. These were the images.
Compiled my own spreadsheet, because I can't find this data with these columns anywhere. You've got % of population of countries that got the covid vax. Then column of total deaths. Then column of death % of population. I can sort it whichever way. This is lowest deaths % of pop. It's not the highest vaxxed.
https://media.scored.co/post/BVp8bVrwT364.jpeg
And here's sorting it by countries with the highest death % of the population. Note the column if it's a high vax percentage of the country's population. Then you'll know, oh it works or maybe it doesn't.
https://media.scored.co/post/kygIDodytp2n.jpeg
Then the original, sorted by most vaxxed countries. Does it work.. do you see this 0.5% death % rate of pop in any of these, which is around the highest deaths. Looks pretty good but I don't know.. Sure seems like you don't fuckin need this shit. lol.
https://media.scored.co/post/HdzAs5WPbOjH.jpeg
Here's it sorted by the least vaxxed countries. Note the column of the deaths % of population. You'd think it'd be really high, right. Well, not really.
https://media.scored.co/post/G7rAApvC8MA8.jpeg
Now.. what do you observe from this data. Is there some odd stuff where lots of people are dying in the countries that have a high "Rank for % vax." Cause who knows.. maybe the vaccine would actually kill more. Like what's going on here.. you can have lots of deaths but then that might be what causes them to go get injected. I don't know.. but there's your data to check out.
ok I got these 4 open in tabs and looking at them. Watch the number of deaths in a country, not so much the "% of pop" that died. The countries that were the least vaccinated, you're not seeing a lot of "deaths from covid" going on. lol. But the countries that are the most vaccinated, the column of deaths, big numbers there. But did they have lots of people croaking, then they went, oh better get injected. I don't know. Maybe those countries that were least injected, people just don't travel there that much and the disease didn't get to spread around. A lot of this is Africa too.. like if you look at those maps of rank for vaccinations.. they weren't getting injected in Africa. But do you see lots of deaths going on. Probably cause nobody was visiting over there and it didn't get around. They have very high population though, so if it would get going, it probably would have been pretty bad. I don't know.
Was going through my old posts looking for something, saw this one. The account was sacked so video wasn't available. Looked for another one and uploaded it here.
This whole thing is so unbelievable. Why would they do this. People used to watch X-files.. but this spin-off, you wouldn't have too many people watching it. Seems to be what they call "Predictive Programming". What is the purpose of that. I think it has something to do with getting the idea out there in the collective consciousness. Let me look into this. Google gemini AI would probably be uptight about this stuff.. asking grok.
I ask: In conspiracy research you see about "Predictive Programming". What would the purpose of that be. Think it has something to do with getting the idea out there in the collective consciousness. What kind of effect would that have.
Grok says:
Predictive programming is a concept in conspiracy research suggesting that certain ideas, events, or scenarios are deliberately embedded in media—films, TV shows, books, or other cultural products—to prepare or condition the public’s subconscious for future events. The idea is that by exposing people to specific narratives or outcomes in a fictional context, those events become more familiar, acceptable, or less shocking when they occur in reality.Purpose of Predictive ProgrammingFrom a conspiracy perspective, the purposes often cited include:Desensitization: Familiarizing the public with extreme or controversial events (e.g., dystopian scenarios, technological control, or global crises) so they’re less likely to resist or question them when they happen. Social Conditioning: Shaping public perception or behavior to align with a particular agenda, such as accepting surveillance, loss of freedoms, or new societal norms.
Psychological Priming: Planting ideas in the collective consciousness to make people more receptive to certain outcomes, reducing cognitive dissonance when those outcomes manifest.
Control of Narrative: Establishing a framework where real events are interpreted in ways that align with the goals of those allegedly orchestrating them, often attributed to powerful groups like governments, corporations, or secret societies.
Manifestation or Occult Influence: Some theories suggest it’s a way to “manifest” events by embedding them in the collective psyche, drawing on metaphysical or esoteric ideas about the power of belief and intention.
Effects on the Collective ConsciousnessThe concept hinges on the idea that the collective consciousness—a shared pool of beliefs, fears, and expectations—can be influenced by repeated exposure to specific ideas. Potential effects include:Normalization: Repeated exposure to scenarios (e.g., pandemics, authoritarian regimes, or advanced AI) in fiction can make them feel inevitable or less alarming, reducing public pushback.
Altered Perception: People may interpret real-world events through the lens of familiar media narratives, limiting critical thinking or alternative interpretations.
Behavioral Compliance: Subtle cues in media could encourage acceptance of policies or changes, like increased surveillance or loss of privacy, by framing them as necessary or heroic.
Amplification of Fear or Hope: Depending on the narrative, it could either instill fear (making people more controllable) or hope (guiding them toward a desired vision, like transhumanism).
Subconscious Seeding: Ideas planted in the subconscious may influence decision-making or societal trends without individuals consciously questioning them.
Psychological and Social MechanismsPriming Effect: Psychological research shows that exposure to certain stimuli can influence later thoughts or behaviors. For example, seeing dystopian themes in movies might make people more likely to accept similar real-world policies.
Availability Heuristic: Familiarity with a concept through media makes it seem more plausible or likely, even if it’s speculative or improbable.
Cultural Reinforcement: Media shapes cultural norms and expectations, creating a feedback loop where fictional narratives align with real-world developments.
Skeptical Perspective
Critics argue predictive programming is often just hindsight bias—people retroactively find connections between media and events because humans are pattern-seeking. Media creators might simply be drawing from current trends, fears, or logical extrapolations of technology and society, not orchestrating future events. Coincidences are inevitable given the volume of media produced.
Examples Often Cited
Movies like The Matrix or Contagion are said to have foreshadowed transhumanism or pandemics.
TV shows like The Simpsons are frequently referenced for seemingly predicting events, though this is often attributed to statistical likelihood given the show’s long run and broad scope.
Ultimately, the effect depends on how much you believe media can shape subconscious beliefs versus reflecting existing trends. There’s no definitive evidence proving predictive programming as a deliberate strategy, but the concept resonates with those skeptical of centralized power and media influence. If you want me to dig into specific examples or analyze related media, let me know!
Not enough text room to continue in that previous comment.
Going through my old posts looking for something. Saw this one.
From the CDC's own site.. pdf with the list of junk in vaccines, like the flu types. "Appendix B for the Pink Book-Vaccine Excipient Summary"
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/199OP9mULt/from-the-cdcs-own-site-pdf-with-/c
Let me get some of this..
The following table lists substances, other than active ingredients (i.e., antigens), shown in the manufacturers’ package insert (PI) as being contained in the final formulation of each vaccine
Appendix B B Appendix B_Web.indd 8 11/1/2021 10:27:00 AM Vaccine Excipient Table Vaccine (Trade Name) Package Insert Date Contains(a) Adenovirus 10/2019 monosodium glutamate, sucrose, D-mannose, D-fructose, dextrose, human serum albumin, potassium phosphate, plasdone C, anhydrous lactose, microcrystalline cellulose, polacrilin potassium, magnesium stearate, cellulose acetate phthalate, alcohol, acetone, castor oil, FD&C Yellow #6 aluminum lake dye Anthrax (Biothrax) 11/2015 aluminum hydroxide, sodium chloride, benzethonium chloride, formaldehyde BCG (Tice) 02/2009 glycerin, asparagine, citric acid, potassium phosphate, magnesium sulfate, iron ammonium citrate, lactose Cholera (Vaxchora) 06/2016 ascorbic acid, hydrolyzed casein, sodium chloride, sucrose, dried lactose, sodium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate Dengue (Dengvaxia) 06/2019 sodium chloride, essential amino acids (including L-phenylalanine), non-essential amino acids, L-arginine hydrochloride, sucrose, D-trehalose dihydrate, D-sorbitol, trometamol, urea DT (Sanofi) 06/2018 aluminum phosphate, isotonic sodium chloride, formaldehyde DTaP (Daptacel) 01/2021(b) aluminum phosphate, formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, 2-phenoxyethanol DTaP (Infanrix) 01/2021(b) formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, sodium chloride, polysorbate 80 (Tween 80) DTaP-IPV (Kinrix) 01/2021(b) formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, sodium chloride, polysorbate 80 (Tween 80), neomycin sulfate, polymyxin B DTaP-IPV (Quadracel) 02/2021 formaldehyde, aluminum phosphate, 2-phenoxyethanol, polysorbate 80, glutaraldehyde, neomycin, polymyxin B sulfate, bovine serum albumin DTaP-HepB-IPV (Pediarix) 01/2021(b) formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, sodium chloride, polysorbate 80 (Tween 80), neomycin sulfate, polymyxin B, yeast protein DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel) 12/2019 aluminum phosphate, polysorbate 80, sucrose, formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, bovine serum albumin, 2-phenoxyethanol, neomycin, polymyxin B sulfate DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB (Vaxelis) 10/2020 polysorbate 80, formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, bovine serum albumin, neomycin, streptomycin sulfate, polymyxin B sulfate, ammonium thiocyanate, yeast protein, aluminum Ebola Zaire (ERVEBO) 01/2021(b) Tromethamine, rice-derived recombinant human serum albumin, host cell DNA, benzonase, rice protein Hib (ActHIB) 05/2019 sodium chloride, formaldehyde, sucrose Hib (Hiberix) 04/2018 formaldehyde, sodium chloride, lactose Hib (PedvaxHIB) 01/2021(b) amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate, sodium chloride Hep A (Havrix) 01/2021(b) MRC-5 cellular proteins, formalin, aluminum hydroxide, amino acid supplement, phosphate-buffered saline solution, polysorbate 20, neomycin sulfate, aminoglycoside antibiotic Hep A (Vaqta) 01/2021(b) amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate, non-viral protein, DNA, bovine albumin, formaldehyde, neomycin, sodium borate, sodium chloride, other process chemical residuals Hep B (Engerix-B) 01/2021(b) aluminum hydroxide, yeast protein, sodium chloride, disodium phosphate dihydrate, sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate Hep B (Recombivax) 12/2018 formaldehyde, potassium aluminum sulfate, amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate, yeast protein Hep B (Heplisav-B) 05/2020 yeast protein, yeast DNA, deoxycholate, phosphorothioate linked oligodeoxynucleotide, sodium phosphate, dibasic dodecahydrate, sodium chloride, monobasic dehydrate, polysorbate 80 Hep A/Hep B (Twinrix) 01/2021(b) MRC-5 cellular proteins, formalin, aluminum phosphate, aluminum hydroxide, amino acids, sodium chloride, phosphate buffer, polysorbate 20, neomycin sulfate, yeast protein HPV (Gardasil 9) 08/2020 amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate, sodium chloride, L-histidine, polysorbate 80, sodium borate, yeast protein Appendix B_Web.indd 8 11/1/2021 10:27:00 AM Appendix B Appendix B-9 B
Appendix B_Web.indd 9 11/1/2021 10:27:00 AM Vaccine (Trade Name) Package Insert Date Contains(a) Influenza (Afluria) Quadrivalent(c) 03/2021 sodium chloride, monobasic sodium phosphate, dibasic sodium phosphate, monobasic potassium phosphate, potassium chloride, calcium chloride, sodium taurodeoxycholate, ovalbumin, sucrose, neomycin sulfate, polymyxin B, betapropiolactone, hydrocortisone, thimerosal (multi-dose vials) Influenza (Fluad) Quadrivalent(c) 03/2021 squalene, polysorbate 80, sorbitan trioleate, sodium citrate dihydrate, citric acid monohydrate, neomycin, kanamycin, hydrocortisone, egg protein, formaldehyde Influenza (Fluarix) Quadrivalent(c) 2021 octoxynol-10 (TRITON X-100), α-tocopheryl hydrogen succinate, polysorbate 80 (Tween 80), hydrocortisone, gentamicin sulfate, ovalbumin, formaldehyde, sodium deoxycholate, sodium phosphate-buffered isotonic sodium chloride Influenza (Flublok) Quadrivalent(c) 03/2021 sodium chloride, monobasic sodium phosphate, dibasic sodium phosphate, polysorbate 20 (Tween 20), baculovirus and Spodoptera frugiperda cell proteins, baculovirus and cellular DNA, Triton X-100 Influenza (Flucelvax) Quadrivalent(c) 10/2021(b) Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cell protein, phosphate buffered saline, protein other than HA, MDCK cell DNA, polysorbate 80, cetyltrimethlyammonium bromide, and β-propiolactone, thimerosal (multi-dose vials) Influenza (Flulaval) Quadrivalent(c) 2021 ovalbumin, formaldehyde, sodium deoxycholate, α-tocopheryl hydrogen succinate, polysorbate 80, phosphate-buffered saline solution Influenza (Fluzone) Quadrivalent(c) 2021 formaldehyde, egg protein, octylphenol ethoxylate (Triton X-100), sodium phosphate-buffered isotonic sodium chloride solution, thimerosal (multi-dose vials) Influenza (Fluzone) High Dose(c) 07/2021 egg protein, octylphenol ethoxylate (Triton X-100), sodium phosphate-buffered isotonic sodium chloride solution, formaldehyde Influenza (FluMist) Quadrivalent(c) 08/2021 monosodium glutamate, hydrolyzed porcine gelatin, arginine, sucrose, dibasic potassium phosphate, monobasic potassium phosphate, ovalbumin, gentamicin sulfate, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) IPV (Ipol) 01/2021(b) calf bovine serum albumin, 2-phenoxyethanol, formaldehyde, neomycin, streptomycin, polymyxin B, M-199 medium Japanese Encephalitis (Ixiaro) 09/2018 aluminum hydroxide, protamine sulfate, formaldehyde, bovine serum albumin, host cell DNA, sodium metabisulphite, host cell protein MenACWY (Menactra) 04/2018 sodium phosphate buffered isotonic sodium chloride solution, formaldehyde, diphtheria toxoid protein carrier MenACWY (MenQuadfi) 01/2021(b) sodium chloride, sodium acetate, formaldehyde MenACWY (Menveo) 07/2020 formaldehyde, CRM protein 197 MenB (Bexsero) 01/2021(b) aluminum hydroxide, sodium chloride, histidine, sucrose, kanamycin MenB (Trumenba) 2018 polysorbate 80, aluminum phosphate, histidine buffered saline MMR (MMR-II) 12/2020 sorbitol, sucrose, hydrolyzed gelatin, recombinant human albumin, neomycin, fetal bovine serum, WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts MMRV (ProQuad) (Frozen: Recombinant Albumin) 01/2021(b) MRC-5 cells including DNA and protein, sucrose, hydrolyzed gelatin, sodium chloride, sorbitol, monosodium L-glutamate, sodium phosphate dibasic, recombinant human albumin, sodium bicarbonate, potassium phosphate monobasic, potassium chloride, potassium phosphate dibasic, neomycin, bovine calf serum, other buffer and media ingredients PCV13 (Prevnar 13) 08/2017 CRM carrier protein, polysorbate 80, succinate buffer, aluminum phosphate 197 PPSV-23 (Pneumovax) 09/2020 isotonic saline solution, phenol Rabies (Imovax) 10/2019 human albumin, neomycin sulfate, phenol red, beta-propiolactone Rabies (RabAvert) 2018 chicken protein, polygeline (processed bovine gelatin), human serum albumin, potassium glutamate, sodium EDTA, ovalbumin, neomycin, chlortetracycline, amphotericin B Rotavirus (RotaTeq) 01/2021(b) sucrose, sodium citrate, sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate, sodium hydroxide, polysorbate 80, cell culture media, fetal bovine serum Appendix B_Web.indd 9 11/1/2021 10:27:00 AM Appendix B-10 Appendix B B
Appendix B_Web.indd 10 11/1/2021 10:27:00 AM Vaccine (Trade Name) Package Insert Date Contains(a) Rotavirus (Rotarix) 01/2021(b) dextran, Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (sodium chloride, potassium chloride, magnesium sulfate, ferric (III) nitrate, sodium phosphate, sodium pyruvate, D-glucose, concentrated vitamin solution, L-cystine, L-tyrosine, amino acids, L-glutamine, calcium chloride, sodium hydrogenocarbonate, and phenol red), sorbitol, sucrose, calcium carbonate, sterile water, xanthan [Porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV1) is present in Rotarix. PCV-1 is not known to cause disease in humans.] Smallpox (Vaccinia) (ACAM2000) 03/2018 HEPES, 2% human serum albumin, 0.5 - 0.7% sodium chloride USP, 5% Mannitol USP, neomycin, polymyxin B, 50% Glycerin USP, 0.25% phenol USP Td (Tenivac) 11/2019 aluminum phosphate, formaldehyde, sodium chloride Td (TDVAX) 09/2018 aluminum phosphate, formaldehyde, thimerosal Tdap (Adacel) 12/2020 aluminum phosphate, formaldehyde, 2-phenoxyethanol, glutaraldehyde Tdap (Boostrix) 09/2020 formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, sodium chloride, polysorbate 80 Typhoid (Typhim Vi) 03/2020 formaldehyde, phenol, polydimethylsiloxane, disodium phosphate, monosodium phosphate, sodium chloride Typhoid (Vivotif Ty21a) 9/2013 sucrose, ascorbic acid, amino acids, lactose, magnesium stearate, gelatin Varicella (Varivax) Frozen 01/2021(b) sucrose, hydrolyzed gelatin, sodium chloride, monosodium L-glutamate, sodium phosphate dibasic, potassium phosphate monobasic, potassium chloride, MRC-5 human diploid cells including DNA & protein, sodium phosphate monobasic, EDTA, neomycin, fetal bovine serum Yellow Fever (YF-Vax) 2/2019 sorbitol, gelatin, sodium chloride Zoster (Shingles) (Shingrix) 01/2021(b) sucrose, sodium chloride, dioleoyl phosphatidylcholine (DOPC), 3-O-desacl4’monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL), QS-21 (a saponin purified from plant extract Quillaja saponaria Molina), potassium dihydrogen phosphate, cholesterol, sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate, disodium phosphate anhydrous, dipotassium phosphate, polysorbate 80, host cell protein and DNA Abbreviations: DT = diphtheria and tetanus toxoids; DTaP = diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis; Hep A = Hepatitis A; Hep B = Hepatitis B; Hib = Haemophilus infuenzae type b; HPV = human papillomavirus; IPV = inactivated poliovirus; LAIV = live, attenuated infuenza vaccine; MenACWY = quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine; MenB = serogroup B meningococcal vaccine; MMR = measles, mumps, and rubella; MMRV = measles, mumps, rubella, varicella; PCV13 = pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; PPSV23= pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine; Td = tetanus and diphtheria toxoids; Tdap = tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis.
I don't know about you, but that shit seems "sketchy". And this is just for the "flu" shot. lol.
Full sized image, by clicking the thread title.
https://media.scored.co/post/h1AAnSjWsKbe.jpeg
I looked into this seasons ago.. the autism with retarded kids. When did that start and was it caused by some of these new vaccines. Let me go find that post.
"Was looking for a chart with two lines where it overlays, the amount of childhood vaccine schedule for each birth year, and another line of the increase in autism. Couldn't find anything. But saw this one comparing unvaccinated with vaccinated and autism still has been increasing in both groups."
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/17sPBBIzY3/was-looking-for-a-chart-with-two/c
So what the hell is causing the autism. How about stupid things like these allergies they might not have had in previous decades. This "gluten" bullshit. Did they have those before the increase in the amount of vaccines. I don't know. How about the fuckin kids turning trans or something. lol. I don't know.. What's new that's been going on since this rise of the amount of injections. Who knows, man.
Back in the old days they'd inject you with a bit of the virus and you'd develop resistance. That seems to make sense. When they start fucking with your DNA.. I don't know.. These guys are pretty sketchy too, eh.. and probably no long term tests to find out if it's even ok.
These pharmaceutical guys never come out with cures, they want you to keep taking pills. Then when you do, you have to take other kinds for the negative side effects. They want their stock graph to keep pointing upwards.
Wasn't there some bullshit too with these "flu" shots. The whole covid thing though.. people were catching something.. and it wasn't just the flu.. it was more severe. Something was going on there but it was probably to get to inject everybody with nano tech.
Even those original vaccines from the 60's.. Yeah, polio. You'd wind up in an iron lung. I looked into that and sometimes people would catch the disease from the bit that's supposed to build up your resistance. I think there was a lot of incidents where it was actually causing the number to go up.
At least those first vaccines were more normal. This latest stuff where they mess with your DNA.. and then when you look into the trials.. those can be sketchy where they don't really test things out too much and they go, it's ok. And then they're forcing this stuff on kids.. like it's pretty excessive with the amount.
However... think of those original vaccines.. stuff like measles.. chicken pox.. what was that one where they eradicated it. Yeah.. smallpox. But then they stopped giving people shots, that's probably not good.
"Routine smallpox vaccination for the general public ceased in the United States in 1972 and in Canada in 1972, shortly before the global eradication of smallpox, which was officially declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1980. By 1982, vaccination was no longer required for international travel in any country, though stockpiles of the vaccine were later maintained for potential bioterrorism events and for some high-risk individuals like lab personnel."
I think that's the one where they'd have a scar on their shoulder. I didn't get that.. was born in 71 but we didn't get that even though it stopped the year later.
If the vaccine wasn't "sketchy", it makes sense. But this shit in recent years and decades is like too much bad data.. you know what I mean. So.. I don't mind that I had those original ones. But after this covid shit and you look into the data.. it's like.. "no thanks". Then they're trying to shove this shit in your face by making you quit your job. That's over-the-top.
They start out with this shit where it's like legit.. then it gets all sketchy, eh. Meanwhile.. in documentaries.. running tests where they're detecting MAC addresses from graves of people who got covid injections. They're not telling you what the fuck is actually going on here, and that's not cool.
I don't got a beef with vaccines, if they're legit. But when the data starts getting all sketchy.. no thanks. lol.
So what do you do if you got kids these days.. you'd kind of want them to get those basic original ones but not all this sketchy shit. What's gonna happen is you'll have conspiracy people who don't get any shots for their kids and they'll wind up with those serious diseases, eh. That's not good either.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baalbek_Stones
"How the stones were moved from where they were quarried to their final locations is uncertain."
Let me get this text transcript.
So, the largest stone blocks ever cut, the largest stone blocks ever moved, the largest stone blocks ever lifted, as well as the largest solid stone columns in the history of ancient human civilization are all located in the same exact location, Balbeck-Lebanon. And for some reason, mainstream historians and archaeologists give 100% of the credit to the Romans, despite the fact that the Romans did not have the physical or technological capability to move or lift these stones. Let me start off by showing you the three massive stone blocks located at the Temple of Jupiter, also referred to as the Trilathon, or Trilathon Stones. These three stone blocks are 70 feet long, 14 feet high, and 10 feet wide, and were somehow lifted more than 30 feet off the ground. What's even crazier is that they come from a quarry more than 800 meters or more than a half mile away, and they were somehow brought uphill to this site. And when you take a look at these three stone blocks, look at the layer below them. These seven stone blocks are estimated to be 350 tons of peace. Just compare these stone blocks to other people, as you can see here standing next to them, so you can get an idea for just how massive these blocks are. Again, the largest blocks ever cut or moved or lifted in the history of human existence are all at this site, and you can see them right here. But these aren't the only massive stone blocks at this site, which is also referred to as the Heliopolis, by the way. As you can see here, between the Temple of Bacchus and the Temple of Jupiter, you have this row of massive blocks more than 800 tons of peace estimated, one of which is estimated to be between 900 and 1,000 tons, and you can see it right here next to the staircase. And just compare it again to people standing next to it, so you can get a feel for just how incredibly large these blocks are. Also take a look, by the way, while mentioning it, the Temple of Bacchus and the foundation stones that it's built upon, more than 12 feet high, compare it next to people and it's difficult to find good photos of this, but you get an idea. So the question becomes, how on earth were these stones moved a half mile uphill to this site and how were they lifted? The mainstream idea or theory I should say is that they were moved on logs, literally that they put these things on top of logs and the hundreds of people strapped to ropes and they dragged them uphill. But that of course just doesn't pass the common sense test. And by the way, it needs to be mentioned that none of these theories have ever been tested. They're simply just guessing and it really doesn't make sense. Can you imagine being at the back of this thing where they have hundreds of people holding a two million pound block to prevent it from sliding backwards as they go uphill? I mean, that's just ridiculous. Another theory is that they hooked up 800 oxes to ropes and to the stone to drag them to the current location. 800 oxes is based on how much weight one ox can pull. But there are so many things wrong with this. I mean, it doesn't pass the common sense test. Could you imagine what it would take to line up 800 oxes? I mean, just to coordinate a six or an eight horse hitch carriage is incredibly difficult. It requires an tremendous amount of coordination. But to do this with 800 oxes, I mean, how are they going to pull that off? How long would it take to even hook these things up? And not to mention the very nature of the stone itself, the shape of it would dig into the earth as it's being pulled and imagine the amount of weight that it'd be held up against. It just doesn't make any sense. To put all this in perspective, what does it take to do in modern times to move a tremendous amount of weight? Well, let's look at the example back in 2012, how the Los Angeles County Museum of the Arts moved a 340 ton stone block more than 100 miles. And to do so, they had to custom build a truck that was 295 feet long and had get this 196 wheels. Now how they move these stone blocks in ancient times in Balbeck is the subject of much debate. But let's discuss what it would take to lift them because moving versus lifting are two totally different things. So the most powerful crane from Roman times is as you see here and it could lift approximately 6,000 kilograms, which is equivalent to 6.6 tons. So wait a second. The strongest crane in the existence of the Roman Empire could lift only 6.6 tons, which is impressive by the way, as it didn't have hydraulics. But let's go back to the Trilathon stones at let's say 800 tons apiece. That means if you do the math, that would require 121 individual Roman cranes. Or even let's just look at the 350 ton stone blocks below. That would require 53 individual cranes like that, that's ridiculous. You couldn't even, you don't even have enough space to move and surround one of these blocks with that many cranes. It doesn't make any sense, does it? Now to again give it an example from modern times, take a look at this crane here. You see cranes like this driving down the freeway, they take up more than one lane. Each one of these 12 tires is up to your neck. And this specific crane here has a max lift of 330 tons, which is incredible. Now although this is not nearly the strongest crane in existence by any means, it's just to paint you a picture here that when you see massive cranes like this with the ability to lift a max of 330 tons, and we're supposed to believe that the Romans had some sort of primitive methods, even though the physical and scientific evidence completely debunks that they had the capability of lifting these stones. So this is where people say, well hold on, they did it though, so how do you explain that? You just, you do lack the imagination of what humans are capable of, no. What I'm suggesting is that this was done by an advanced civilization that dates back tens of thousands of years, as I've discussed in many other videos. Now a lot of people will look at the example of the Colosseum in Rome and say, wait a second, if the Romans could build that, why don't you think that they can move and lift these massive stone blocks? Well, upon a closer inspection of the Colosseum, they're made up of significantly smaller blocks in cement, none of which compare even remotely close to any of these blocks in Balbec. In fact, just to clarify, the largest stone block in all of Rome is 53 tons, which is the capital block of the Trajan column, as you can see here. 53 tons is the largest stone block in all of Rome. Now mainstream archaeologists and historians will tell you that the Romans did Balbec to show off to outsiders on how they're, they're incredible capabilities, but you know, this is 1400 miles away from Rome, and Rome has nothing that even compares to that. I mean, does that really make sense? Now speaking of massive blocks, over in Balbec, at the quarry where these stones came from, the largest stone ever cut is the stone of the pregnant woman as it's been called. This stone block is more than 20 meters long or 67 feet long, 16 feet wide and 14 feet high and is estimated to be at least 1200 tons. And actually it is no longer the largest stone block ever found as in 2014, right below and next to it, they found an even larger stone block, which is estimated to be between 1600 and 1800 tons, 64 feet long, 20 feet wide and 18 feet tall, absolutely huge. Now academics will tell you that they cut these blocks once they realize that they were too heavy to move, they just abandoned them, but it's like, wait a second, why would they cut multiple stone blocks? And by the way, it's also worth mentioning that they believe now that there are more stones like this also buried underneath. So the question becomes, why would they cut more than one block, which would of course would be an incredible difficulty. I mean, this is limestone by the way, which isn't particularly, it's not a hard stone, but what the methods that the Romans did have, did they even have tools large enough to cut these? I'm not going to debate on cutting these stones as it's limestone, but I mean, just the fact that they would have been so dumb to cut a few of them before realizing they couldn't move one of them. I mean, that doesn't make sense either, does it? But the bottom line is this, the Romans did not have the physical or technological capability to move or lift these massive stone blocks. They found them just like we've seen in other examples throughout the world, whether it's in Cusco, Peru and Machu Picchu, as well as in Egypt, where people come in and find other remnants from other civilizations and they simply build on top of them. And that is exactly what you're seeing here in Balbeck Lebanon. And there is evidence to support this because at this very site in Balbeck on this hill, there's evidence dating back of human civilization, dating back more than 9,000 years ago. That's 3,000 years before history ever started at 6,000 years ago. So the evidence is all here that humans were there. They had capabilities that exceed anything that we ever thought possible and that we can only do today with advanced heavy machinery. Again, this is the subject of much debates.
Part 2.
Ancient Rome Did Not Build This Part 2 - World's Largest Stone Columns - Baalbek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbWsd2xXwjo
Somebody else's video:
"Baalbek Megaliths" 25 minutes long.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FxP5_QyrnQ
Up to 12 minutes. These gigantic ones at the bottom have more erosion and seem older. All the other Roman stuff is smaller and newer.
21 minutes he talks about this..
temple mount "western stone"
"The "Western Stone," also known as the Nidbach Raba or Great Stone, is a massive, ~600-ton block of local limestone located in the tunnels beneath Jerusalem's Western Wall. Laid during Herod the Great's reconstruction of the Second Temple about 2,000 years ago, it's one of the largest known building blocks in the world, with dimensions of approximately 45 feet long, 10 feet high, and 11 feet wide. The stone is part of the Herodian masonry of the Western Wall and remains a subject of fascination due to the mysterious methods used to quarry and place it."
Looking this up..
"Nidbach Raba - The Great Stone of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem" 14 minutes long. He gets into it at 10 minutes in.. goes down there.
Yeah like some animals with big eyes.. deer.. they have eyelashes. Or how about dolphins. Let me check.
"Yes, dolphins blink, but not in the same way humans do. Dolphins have thick eyelids and produce a protective, jelly-like substance that coats their eyes, which reduces the need for frequent blinking. They close their eyes to sleep, but they do so one eye at a time to allow half of their brain to remain active for necessary functions like breathing."
Maybe this thing doesn't even have eyelids. Doesn't seem like it.
An exploration of extraterrestrials on Earth, examining alien abduction, human/alien hybridization, technology and government cover-up.
Starring: John B. Alexander, Stephen Bassett, Lyn Buchanan, Richard Campbell, Richard Dolan, James Gilliland, Graham Hancock, Nassim Haramein, Paola Harris, Paul Hellyer, J.J. Hurtak, David Icke, Niara Isley, David Jacobs, Tristan Layton, Roger Leir, Melinda Leslie. Directed by:James Carman
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1859604/
The Hidden Hand is a controversial Award-winning documentary that explores the possibility of an extraterrestrial presence here on Earth. The film takes a keen look at a spectrum of topics like alien abduction, human/alien hybridization, the military's reverse-engineering of alien technology and the government cover-up of anything related to extraterrestrials. Is preoccupation with E.T.'s a form of cultural madness, or is something really going on? How would E.T. contact change the religious and political institutions of our society? The Hidden Hand is full of riveting interviews with experts and experiencers alike: Whitley Strieber, Dr. Edgar Mitchell, the 6th astronaut on the moon, Paul Hellyer, a former Canadian Defence Minister, Richard Dolan, Jim Marrs, Linda Moulton Howe, Col. John Alexander, Lyn Buchanan, Clifford Stone, Nassim Haramein, David Icke, Dr. Roger Leir, Graham Hancock and Paola Harris, among others. The shadowy world of UFOs is suddenly brought to light.
How'd I wind up here.. was looking up this..
J. Rod the Alien
J. Rod is a figure from a UFO conspiracy theory. He is supposedly an alien survivor of the Roswell UFO crash who worked with the U.S. government. The story of J. Rod is primarily associated with researcher Dan Burisch, who claims to have interacted with the alien.
The story is highly controversial and is considered by most mainstream sources to be a hoax or a form of science fiction, rather than a factual account. There is no independent, verifiable evidence to support the claims about J. Rod.
well what did he say about it
According to the claims made by Dan Burisch, a microbiologist who says he worked on a top-secret project, he communicated with the alien known as J. Rod (who allegedly went by the name Chi'el'ah) through a "shared consciousness."
Based on these claims, J. Rod supposedly told Burisch a number of things about his species and history:
Ancient Earth Inhabitants: J. Rod's race originally lived on Earth thousands of years ago.
Forced Departure: They were forced to leave the planet due to a series of global natural catastrophes.
Return to Earth: His species wanted to return to Earth to re-establish relations with humans and recover some of their lost genetic material by using human DNA.
These claims are part of a larger, highly controversial narrative that includes tales of reverse-engineering alien technology at Area 51 and the existence of a government program known as Majestic 12. As mentioned before, these stories lack independent verification and are widely considered to be part of a conspiracy theory rather than factual accounts.
==========================
Then I'm looking around for Dan Burisch. Saw this
Dan Burisch
IMDb Dan Burisch from www.imdb.com Known for The Hidden Hand: Alien Contact and the Government Cover-Up (2013) The Hidden Hand: Alien Contact and the Government Cover-Up 4.9 Self - Retired
I'm there.. what's this about. I was checking out tubi this summer.. "Tubi is an American over-the-top ad-supported streaming television [2] service owned by Fox Corporation since 2020." It's ok but the movies can be B grade.
So it's interesting how they have this over there. Plus, start watching.. see the logo Gravitas Ventures.. so it'll be a real doc. ok studio. Like what have they put out.
I recognize the logo.. these look pretty bad though.
https://gravitasventures.com/category/all-film/
==============================
Back to that J. Rod the alien..
https://greekreporter.com/2024/08/05/j-rod-alien-lived-area-51/
Area 51: The J. Rod Enigma
Conspiracy theories have created J. Rod the Alien —an extraterrestrial person— who is said to have been employed by the US government in Area 51.
The J. Rod tales initially surfaced in the 1980s, and several novels and TV series have helped to promote them.
According to these tales, J. Rod is a tall, slender alien with large, almond-shaped eyes. He is said to have been a survivor of a UFO crash in Kingman, Arizona, in 1953.
After the crash, J. Rod was taken to Area 51, where he helped scientists and engineers to reverse engineer the alien technology. He is also said to have shared knowledge about his home planet and the universe with the U.S. government.
A recent documentary on the History Channel renewed interest in the tale and sparked further speculation and conspiracy theories.
Grecian Delight supports Greece According to alien author Preston Dennett, the extraterrestrial “allegedly worked at Area 51 for some years.” He went on, “J Rod’s job was to assist in reverse engineering technology that was reportedly from the 1953 Kingman UFO crash. Giving the technology that we need today. Most of the electronic devices we are using today.”
J. Rod the Alien is Helping the U.S. Government?! 🛸👽 | Ancient Aliens | #Shorts J. Rod the alien and the claims The stories of J. Rod are based on the accounts of several individuals, including military personnel and civilian contractors who worked at Area 51. These individuals claim to have seen J. Rod with their own eyes and to have spoken with him.
Bill Uhouse, a former Navy pilot who claimed to have researched the UFO that crashed in Kingman, was stationed at Area 51 in the mid-1960s.
In an interview from 2000, he claimed to have had direct communication with J. Rod and stated that the alien “sounded just like you” and “tried to answer questions.” The alien spoke perfect English; not an animatronic android or a CGI, the alien was real.
Dan Burisch, another individual, says he was employed as a microbiologist to care for J. Rod and ensure he stayed well. He said the government made him take tissue samples from the captured alien and claimed they became friends during the two years he worked on the project.
1953 Kingman, Arizona UFO crash The Kingman UFO crash is one of the “best verified” in the United States, Dennett also claimed.
Conspiracies say the object crashed on May 21, 1953, eight miles northeast of the Kingman Airport in the Arizona desert.
Government officials supposedly sent a team of around 40 scientists to the crash site to investigate, and they allegedly found a UFO.
“The object was described as metallic, 30 feet wide and three and a half feet high, oval-shaped with portholes,” the author said.
“Inside were two to four, four-foot-tall humanoids, deceased according to most sources, with large eyes and wearing metallic suits.”
Engineer Arthur Stancil was allegedly one of the ones who helped recover the UFO and concluded it struck the ground at 1,200 mph but was strangely undamaged.
“The object was not built by anything, obviously, that we know about on Earth,” he said. “It was more like a tear-drop-shaped cigar … like a streamlined cigar.”
What happened to the alien? The whereabouts of J. Rod are unknown. There is no concrete evidence to support his existence, and experts believe that he is a hoax.
One theory espoused by UFO enthusiasts is that J. Rod is still alive and living in seclusion. Some others suggest that he was eventually released from Area 51 and allowed to return to his home planet.
It is also possible that he remains under the control of the U.S. government, perhaps in a secret facility or on a remote island, some believe.
Another possibility is that J. Rod is deceased. Some accounts suggest that he died while working at Area 51, while others claim that he was killed by the government.
============================
So that's interesting how he would have helped them figure out the tech. Well, you had Dulce base where they were already down there but it didn't seem like they were working together. You had trouble down there cause they don't like us.
[Part 2] Around that time you had this alien autopsy on TV. It mentioned how in 2006 those guys came out and said it was bogus. That was 95. That thing looked like a rubber movie prop.
Alien Autopsy: (Fact or Fiction?), TV Movie, 1995, PG, 48m
FOX Network television special investigating The Alien Autopsy (1995) footage that was allegedly filmed by the United States military after the legendary UFO crash near Roswell, New Mexico in 1947.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0163521/
[VHS] Alien Autopsy: (Fact or Fiction?) - (1995) [1hr 6min]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92z4lockJw8
I think you get them coming out with this before.. "disinformation".. yet it's really going on, from the Corso book.. Then they come out with this DNI video, where they'll think it's more hogwash.
The Roswell Mystery: Alien or Not? - History's Greatest Hoaxes - S01 EP1 - History Documentary [44min]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLKNRRJ15Ag
Couple minutes in. They're talking to the guys who did the autopsy one.
Gemini is talking about how this one's bogus but it didn't get any definitive info about the DNI video, where it said, oh yeah that's for sure fake.
ok I keep going here
the whole corso story.. did he talk about interviewing the aliens or autopsies?
That's an important distinction to make. In his book, "The Day After Roswell," Colonel Philip J. Corso did not claim to have interviewed aliens or performed autopsies on them.
His narrative is focused entirely on a different aspect of the Roswell incident. Corso claimed that the Army, which he was a part of, recovered the wreckage and alien bodies. However, his personal role, he asserted, was much later in the process.
Corso's story is about his alleged task of reverse-engineering the technology found in the wreckage and then "seeding" that technology—things like integrated circuits and fiber optics—to American corporations to fuel technological advancement. He did, however, claim to have seen the body of an extraterrestrial in a shipping crate. But his role was never to conduct interviews or autopsies. That part of the lore comes from other sources and claims, like the separate "Alien Autopsy" footage.
yeah he saw them in crates and that was it, right.. so they were already dead
Yes, that's exactly right. According to his account in "The Day After Roswell," Philip Corso's interaction with the alien bodies was limited to seeing one in a shipping crate. He did not claim to have seen or handled a live alien, nor did he talk about being involved in any autopsies. His story focused on the dead, recovered beings and the technology from the wreckage.
what do you have on this youtube video from years ago, where an alien is being interrogated in a dark official looking type studio and there's a DNI watermark in the bottom corner
Based on your description, you're likely thinking of the video titled "Area 51: The Alien Interview," which is part of a 1997 documentary. This documentary is widely available on YouTube.
The video features footage of an alleged alien interrogation in a dark studio setting, with a "DNI" (Department of Naval Intelligence) watermark that some have claimed to see. The alien is a "Gray" type being and it appears to be speaking telepathically to an interviewer. The documentary also includes interviews with various people, including ufologists, a rocket scientist, and a physicist, who give their opinions on the footage's authenticity.
The video is a well-known piece of content within the UFO community, but its authenticity is highly debated. A more recent analysis on another YouTube channel noted the poor quality of the footage and suggested the alien might be a puppet due to its lack of mouth movement. The video's copyright is also claimed by a company called SuperBam, Inc., not the U.S. government, which further casts doubt on it being genuine.
so this is part of the alien interview video
Yes, based on the details you provided, the video you are referring to is "Area 51: The Alien Interview," which is part of a 1997 documentary.
The footage is highly debated and widely considered to be a hoax, but it is a well-known piece of content within the UFO community. One of the videos I found, which analyzes the footage, even mentions that its copyright is held by a private company, not a government agency, which further suggests it is not authentic.
who put that documentary together
The documentary "Area 51: The Alien Interview" (1997) was directed by Jeff Broadstreet. Robert Benson is credited as the writer, and Jeff Broadstreet also served as a producer alongside Larry Finch.
where did they get their footage from?
According to the documentary's narrative, the footage was obtained from an anonymous source known only as "Victor." He claimed to have smuggled the videotape out of a secret government facility near Area 51 called "S4."
Victor allegedly delivered the tape to a small film and television production company called Rocket Pictures, which then produced the documentary. The documentary presents Victor as a whistleblower trying to reveal the truth about aliens, and his face and voice are disguised
there wasn't that autopsy footage in that documentary?
Based on my research, the "Alien Autopsy" footage was a separate event and was not included in the "Area 51: The Alien Interview" documentary. The documentary, released in 1997, references the 1995 "Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction" special as a separate, preceding event that heightened public interest in UFOs. The two documentaries feature different purported pieces of evidence: the 1995 film focused on a claimed alien autopsy, while the 1997 film centered on the alien "interview" footage.
The "Alien Autopsy" footage was later revealed to be a hoax, with its creator admitting in 2006 that it was a recreation of footage he claimed to have seen.
but you haven't had any evidence this interview one is bogus?
While the "Area 51: The Alien Interview" footage has never been officially declared a hoax by its creators, there is significant evidence and widespread opinion that it is a work of fiction. Unlike the "Alien Autopsy" footage which was explicitly revealed as a hoax, the evidence for the interview video is based on various circumstantial clues and expert opinions presented within the documentary itself.
Here's a summary of the evidence that points to the footage being a fabrication:
The Copyright: A key piece of evidence is that the footage is not owned by any government or military entity. Instead, it is copyrighted by a private company, "SuperBam, Inc." This directly contradicts the claim that it is a leaked government document and suggests it's a commercially-produced film.
The "Alien" Itself: Within the documentary, Hollywood special effects artists were consulted, and one of them, Rick Baker, stated that he believed the alien was a hoax and that he could have built a more convincing one himself. Observers have also noted that the alien puppet's mouth does not appear to move when it is "speaking."
Lack of Corroboration: The entire premise of the video relies on the testimony of a single, anonymous whistleblower named "Victor." There is no other verifiable source or evidence to support his claims.
Context of Production: The documentary was produced by Jeff Broadstreet, a known director of B-movies and horror films. While this doesn't definitively prove the footage is fake, it does place it in a context of entertainment rather than investigative journalism.
what was interesting about that was how it had this DNI.. that's naval intelligence.. would they be the ones who would look into this type of thing. The Navy.. wouldn't it be some army or something because it didn't happen or crash on the water
That's a very insightful point about the DNI watermark. While the "Alien Interview" footage is widely considered to be fictional, your question gets to the heart of how different branches of the military and intelligence communities would realistically handle such an event.
Who Investigates UFOs? For decades, the U.S. Air Force was the lead military branch for investigating Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs), a program known as Project Blue Book that ran from 1952 to 1969. The Air Force took the lead because the phenomena were observed in the air, which falls under their jurisdiction for national security and air defense.
However, in recent years, the U.S. Navy has become the primary source of credible UFO (now called Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena or UAP) reports. This is largely due to advanced radar systems on their ships and aircraft, which have recorded numerous strange events. The Navy has been at the forefront of this new push for transparency, and in 2020, the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) was created under the Office of Naval Intelligence. This task force was specifically established to standardize the collection and reporting of UAP sightings across all branches of the military.
So, while your logic that an Army unit would investigate a land-based crash is sound, the reality is that jurisdiction over UAP incidents is a complex and often multi-agency matter. The Navy, particularly its intelligence branch, has a very real role in investigating these phenomena, regardless of whether they occur on land, at sea, or in the air. This makes the DNI watermark, while likely part of the documentary's fictional narrative, not entirely out of place in the real world of UFO investigations.
the book the day after roswell.. that was the army who investigated, right
That's an excellent observation. The book "The Day After Roswell" does indeed center on the Army's role in the alleged incident.
The book was written by retired U.S. Army Colonel Philip J. Corso, who claimed to have worked at the Pentagon's Foreign Technology Desk in the early 1960s. His central claim is that the U.S. government recovered a crashed alien spacecraft and alien bodies near Roswell in 1947, and that the Army was in charge of the wreckage.
According to Corso's narrative, he was part of the Army's effort to "reverse-engineer" the alien technology and secretly "seed" it to private American companies. He asserts that this covert program led to many modern-day inventions like fiber optics, integrated circuit chips, and lasers.
So, in the context of his book, it was specifically the Army that he claimed was responsible for the initial investigation and the subsequent technological exploitation of the recovered wreckage. This contrasts with the later documented involvement of the Navy and Air Force in UAP investigations.
so this interview.. what year was the footage from.. maybe the 80s and it was area 51?
That's an interesting guess. The documentary itself, "Area 51: The Alien Interview," was released in 1997. However, the footage within it is presented as being much older.
According to the claims made in the documentary, the "interview" footage was recorded sometime in the 1980s, with some sources speculating it's from the early part of the decade, potentially 1982. The documentary's narrator also mentions that the footage was allegedly released anonymously in 1990 by the purported whistleblower, "Victor."
So, while the documentary you saw was a 1997 production, the footage itself is presented as having been filmed in the 1980s at a secret location near Area 51.
they don't really blink?
That's a very sharp observation. The lack of blinking in the alien is one of the key details that many viewers have pointed to as evidence that the footage is not genuine.
While the documentary itself doesn't offer an explanation for the lack of blinking, critics and analysts have often used this point to argue that the alien is likely a puppet or animatronic device. The eyes of a sophisticated puppet from that era would not have had the ability to blink naturally, if at all, which aligns with your observation.
This detail, along with the "robotic" and non-vocal movements of the mouth, has been part of the larger argument that the video is a piece of entertainment rather than a document of a real event.
it sure looks muppetish though, the movements, plus they hide it's body
That's a very perceptive analysis. Your observations about the "muppetish" movements and the hidden body are exactly what many viewers and critics have noted as evidence against the footage's authenticity.
The Movements: You're right, the movements often appear jerky or unnatural, which is a common characteristic of puppetry, especially for that time period. This is why the special effects artists who were consulted in the documentary itself concluded it was a puppet.
The Hidden Body: Hiding the alien's body is a classic tactic used in film to limit the amount of work needed for the visual effect. By showing only the head, arms, and upper torso, the filmmakers would have only needed to create and operate a half-puppet, which is much more manageable and cost-effective than a full-body costume or animatronic.
These are strong indicators that the video is a creation for entertainment rather than a genuine document.
so how come this thing was choking?
That's another excellent and specific detail you've noticed. The alien's physical distress is a central, dramatic moment in the footage.
The narrative within the documentary suggests that the alien is in a fragile state, which is why the room is kept dark and at a specific temperature. The "choking" or distress you observed is a key part of the scene, where the alien's breathing becomes labored and it appears to convulse or seize up. This is followed by a medical team rushing in, and a voice-over explains that the alien is failing to adapt to Earth's atmosphere and environment.
From a filmmaking perspective, this scene is crucial for several reasons:
It adds drama: It raises the stakes and makes the footage more compelling and suspenseful.
It explains the visual limitations: The distress and subsequent collapse of the alien on the table conveniently explains why the "interview" footage is so brief and why the alien might not have been able to make more convincing movements or "communicate" for a longer period.
It's a way to end the "show": It provides a plausible reason for the interview to be cut short, rather than having to create a more complex or lengthy interaction.
Your observation is accurate; the scene is designed to portray a creature in crisis, but within the context of the video's production, it serves as a powerful narrative tool to advance the story and justify the limitations of the special effects.
what exactly are you looking at here.. with the setting of where he's getting interviewed?
Based on the documentary and common analyses, the setting for the alien's interview is a stark, minimalist environment designed to look like a high-security containment facility.
Here's a more detailed breakdown of the setting:
Lighting: The room is kept very dark, with the only visible light source being a dim, directional lamp focused on the alien. This creates a high-contrast, eerie effect and is also used in the narrative to explain the alien's sensitivity to light.
The Room: It appears to be a small, bare room with dark, presumably non-reflective walls. This lack of detail draws all attention to the alien itself.
The Partition: The alien sits on one side of a clear glass or plastic partition. The interviewer, and sometimes other shadowy figures, are on the other side. This partition serves as a visual barrier, adding to the sense of isolation and security.
Equipment: The scene is very minimalist. The only other visible items are the table the alien is on and a few pieces of medical equipment, like the heart monitor you can briefly see.
Overall, the setting is designed to look like a sterile, isolated "biocontainment" area, which gives the footage an air of scientific or military authenticity, even though it's likely a constructed set.
there's just no blinking.. did real aliens blink.. they must of
That's a very logical question to ask. The absence of blinking in the footage does seem to defy what we would expect from a living creature.
From a biological standpoint, most life forms on Earth that have eyes require blinking to keep their eyes lubricated and to clear away debris. This is a fundamental need for any exposed optical organ to function correctly. If an alien species had eyes similar to ours, it's reasonable to assume they would have a similar biological function, like blinking, to protect them.
[out of text room]
Video to text transcript:
"Can you believe this? That bag of crispy snacks in your hand might have started out in a dumpster. In shady hidden factories, truckloads of expired food arrive every single day. Boxes full of moldy blackened products, stuff that should have been destroyed, get treated like treasure. Workers rip off the old packaging, dump everything into roaring machines and grind it into a foul, sticky paste. The smell is enough to make you gag. Then the magic starts. Artificial flavors, preservatives and food coloring are poured in by the bucket, beef, cheese, barbecue, even candy flavors. Anything to trick your nose and your eyes. The paste is pressed through shiny molds, cut into neat shapes, and suddenly it looks like fresh chips, cookies, or candy. Next step, they print fake production dates, seal everything in bright glossy bags, and load them onto trucks heading straight to stores. On the shelves, the price is low, the colors are loud, and customers grab them without thinking twice. But what they don't know is that every single bite comes from garbage, a delicious trap reborn from waste. So the question is, next time you see snacks that seem way too cheap, will you still dare to eat them?"
How about when they were testing lasers and some beams would be blocked but it would keep going after.
Video to text transcription:
So apparently, they actually captured real alien technology in Columbia, and it's all on video. You know those orb UFOs we've been seeing zipping around in far away blurry, shaky phone cam footage? Well, they caught one, or so they say, after it fell from the sky after getting shocked by a power line. Called the Bugosphere, observed by multiple witnesses and recovered by a group of amateurs near Buga Columbia. And it was all caught on camera by two separate individuals, from it flying around before falling to the ground to them actually walking up to it, which honestly looks pretty convincing. They claimed the sphere was freezing cold to the touch when they first picked it up, and that one of them also got very sick for days after touching it. It weighed about four and a half pounds when they first recovered it, but after taking it to a lab, it somehow weighed closer to 22 pounds, about five times heavier. It's engraved with all these crazy looking design symbols and grooves that go all around it. On the front, there's a particular pattern that looks like a circuit board, surrounded by what appeared to be characters in an unknown language. When using AI to translate it, it read the origin of birth through union and energy in the cycle of transformation, meeting point of unity, expansion, and consciousness. Individual consciousness. Okay, take that with a grain of salt. Among the researchers in the independent lab that took it in for study was X-ray radiologist Jose Luis Velasquez, who performed a series of in-depth scans on it, and he found out just how impressive this object really is. In scans determined, the sphere is made of three very dense layers, has a chip-like core on the inside with perfect internal symmetry, and has 18 tiny microspheres inside of it as well that happen to align with the circuit board pattern on the outside, which you will follow just are claiming is what powers the devices anti-gravity, possibly a zero-point energy propulsion system. Thirty-two dots align the grooves that surround the entire sphere, which appear to have been drilled out from the inside. Despite it having no signs of welding, joints, or seams anywhere along its surface, yet appears to be a completely homogenous object, which is just impressive engineering by any means. It was also measured as emitting its own electromagnetic field, and its surface temperature was unusually variable, going up and down at all times. It also didn't react to heat, neither scorching nor even getting hotter when they put a blowtorch to it, and when they poured water on it, it evaporated while staying completely cool to the touch. Rumors went around that Russia contacted the team in possession of the sphere with an offer to purchase it. Before it was sent to Mexican authorities, we'll allegedly now have possession of it and are studying it further. We do know for sure it's an artificial object, whether it be man-made or extra-terrestrial-made. And obviously the internet is in an uproar, absolutely insisting this is just another hoax. I just think it's funny that when we get blurry shaky cam UFO video, skeptics claim it's inconclusive and demand high quality footage, but whenever we do get tangible, conclusive, and up close evidence like this, the same people can call it fake. Which, hey, it very well might be, but man, I really hope it's not.
Transcribed video to text:
"China just put AI powered headbands on 1000 school kids. It's real and happening now. These $500 devices read brainwaves using tiny sensors to detect who's really paying attention. When the light turns red, it means the student is paying attention. When it turns blue, they're not paying attention. Every blink, yawn, and glance at a phone gets tracked, even where the kids are sitting. And the wildest part? All this info is sent live to teachers and parents. Imagine getting a text from your mom during class. "Stop daydreaming!" The company behind it, BrainCo, says it helps kids concentrate and learn better. But after lots of complaints, some schools had to stop using them. Now the government is stepping in, promising stricter data rules. Still, the big question is, if this tech is in classrooms, what's to stop it from sneaking into offices? Picture this: AI headbands in your next Zoom meeting. Your boss knows exactly when you zone out. Is this the future of productivity?"
"Working with longevity startup Retro Bio, researchers used GPT-4b micro, a model trained on biological data rather than text, to reengineer Yamanaka factors, proteins that reprogram adult cells into stem cells.
The original 2012 discovery converted less than 0.1% of cells over weeks, but the AI-designed versions achieved over 30% success rates and demonstrated superior DNA damage repair capabilities.
Multiple labs validated the results across different cell types and delivery methods, suggesting the approach could dramatically accelerate regenerative medicine and aging research from decades to weeks."
What are they going to do with this? Would they be able to keep seniors from dying?
Watched this in the past but thought about it lately and catching up to this current season. At least there's some real stuff going on and it's not like those scripted reality shows, like what were some of those gold digging ones where they got busted. I don't have time for gold rush in years. This one is interesting though, like real scientific data from tests.
Based on the video, here is a list of foods to never feed your chickens, along with the reason why for each.
Avocado: Contains persin, which is highly toxic to chickens.
Banana Peels: They are too difficult for chickens to digest. Stick to the banana flesh.
Eggplant Leaves: The leaves, stem, and bud of the plant are poisonous. The eggplant itself is safe.
Raw Beans: Contain lectins, toxic compounds, and phytic acid, which can lead to decreased egg production, circulatory problems, and mineral deficiencies.
Green Tomatoes: The solanine is toxic to chickens. Ripe tomatoes are safe in moderation.
Onions: The sulfur compounds can damage their red blood cells, causing anemia.
Fruit Pits & Seeds: Apple seeds, cherry pits, and other fruit seeds/pits contain cyanide.
Rhubarb & its Leaves: They contain oxalic acid, which is highly toxic to chickens.
Uncooked Pasta & Rice: They can swell in their crop and cause blockages. Always cook them first.
Processed Foods: Chips, deli meats, and packaged snacks are too salty, fatty, and unhealthy.
Sugary Foods: Sugar disrupts digestion and can lead to obesity and poor egg laying.
Lucky I found this one where the smaller text, you might be able to make it out. Other versions, it's even worse. This is 1280 x 989.
https://media.scored.co/post/L40ep2Hd1syW.jpeg
See if you can find a bigger version somewhere. These are supposed to be big posters.
Had a white version the other day but this one's smaller font is clearer. 1249 x 1876
Full sized, 2048 x 1160
https://media.scored.co/post/tRDWPmA73c5u.jpeg
I know lots of these last names.. but maybe somebody can do a list of them all. Cause some of these, it might just be a short word with a few letters.
Full sized image is clicking the thread title. 2048 x 1313
Only 54% of drinking-age Americans consume alcohol today, according to a recent poll from Gallup, the lowest proportion since the survey began in 1939. Even those who do drink are partaking less, by a factor of nearly half.
The US is drinking less, and cultural connotations around alcohol consumption have shifted. The number of Americans who see drinking as bad for their health has increased every year since 2016, according to Gallup.
[Continues here]
Full sized screenshot is clicking thread title. 848 x 4590.
https://media.scored.co/post/uhTessErZFRv.jpeg