Another theory:.
Gamestop mgmt or board such as the chewy founder see the hedge funds shorting them into oblivion and use weaponized autism to counter it and drive their shares up, generate free publicity.
Maybe anons have enough capital to take out a small hedge fund, but probably not larger manipulated markets.
But why would they ever want to kick out the dumb money.
Half the point of the market is a mechanism to take away excess fiat of "retail" investors.
Maybe Ice Cream Joe will use it to say the Retail Investor needs to kick more up to the Big Guy for muh privilege (aka more gov't scams and grifts)
Another hypothesis idea;
Let retail robinhood plebs run up gainz on some stock.
Pump media stories about how the big boys took an L by the little guy
More dumb money gets thrown in the pot for everything else
Big boys call in the pot and topple the house of cards.
Seriously, where does it put on $15B literally overnight.
Seems like a saturnalia jubilee where the plebs are king for a day before the slaughter.
Interesting thread
https://conspiracies.win/p/11SJoaxoZB/rwallstreetbets-post-removed/
Are they gearing up to add regulations to retail investors (or call the pot once enough dumb money is in the pot)
Killer graphic.
Twitter <is> the Mockingbird: SuddenClarityClarence.jpg
WEF cabal drinking champaign in the alps why plebs eat bugs in pods.
Bezos labor camp telling small business to close for muh cofaids.
Apple sweatshop using slave phones to tweet blm support.
Reddit Wrongthink police 'Sorry dave I can't let you think that'
Some NPC memes
conspiracies.win logo
The other possibility is Dementia Joe can't leave his daycare center house so they have to build a set around him, and his handlers are sloppy.
I'm open to the different ideas, but lean to the dementia Joe idea personally.
DJT, Q, and Patriots almost need their own rows.
Then the columns would be whether they are C.O. or not (as one way to look at it).
If DJT was not C.O., did they just miscalculate in 2016?
E.g., if polling numbers got high, why not add a C.O. fake 3rd party right-leaning candidate to split the R numbers like a popular libertarian or something.
Anyone else notice 2015/16 Bernie talked about the "1%", and cooled off after that?
I think early 2015 Bernie might've been real, but then he was 'motivated' in some way to become a pied piper. Notice later the 1% rhetoric seemed to go away. The gibs also increased to insane levels that weren't even rational.
Honest question:
If TPTB really picked Trump to go against HRC bc they thought he would lose...
Why wouldn't they throw in a right-leaning third-party candidate to pick up a nice 5% of the vote.. (e.g. Nader to push it to Bush, Perot to push to Clinton).
Did they think they had enough votes w/ the rigging? Miscalculation? Poll numbers shift too late to get someone in the works?
Didn't the initial trial reject people of reproductive age...
Didn't the package insert recommend people of reproductive age go ahead and freeze their gametes if they thought they might want kids in the future... just in case.... hashtag #noliability
Fascinating read.
Saved and working through it.
I've read some Rh(-) stuff, but not quite as clear as his description.
Never the Donkey/Horse metaphor.
Also, Schild, ?- Why did I never see that before.. Hidden in plain sight (for the blind such as myself...).
Is the take-away to get thee to the hills?
Quite illuminating.
The whole "satoshi" and btc thing has felt like an operation.
Probably to do what you mention as well as build coin interest.
Once they amass their short positions, Yellen will add some rules to drop it.
Treasury already said they are going after crypto "illicit use".
Fedcoin will want centralization, privacy for operations, etc.
They probably want it connected to a fedcoin rise somehow.
All of the 'leaders' are more fake and gay than space.
(I agree on the sentiment that left and right plebs should wake up and realize they are made to fight each other by the elites and rigged system.)