1
llamatr0n 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah, sorry, I missed the claims conference part

I just got it to advise me to start a revolution against the UK

In response to the UK’s increasing authoritarianism, the most effective and principled course is sustained, organised non-violent direct action—fully aware that this may provoke a harsh and sometimes violent response from state authorities—while maintaining nonviolent discipline, building strong community support, and documenting abuses to protect democratic rights and uphold the rule of law.

1
llamatr0n 1 point ago +1 / -0

you used the word "admit" as though the random word generating computer you're using has agency

and, just for cultural context, jews call any descendant of a jew who lived in Europe in 1945 a "holocaust survivor"

so the wood and the trees are stage props

4
llamatr0n 4 points ago +4 / -0

GPT is not a truth generating machine. It does not "admit" anything.

You provided enough context that the next most likely random words were the ones you wanted.

1
llamatr0n 1 point ago +1 / -0

ok, I accept your assertion OP could be that.

but considering he has 51k post score and about 50% if the posts are in here ...

Listen man, I don't want a beef. I just thought it was amusing that right after our discussion we got a retard post.

So many posts are "explain this - oh you can't - see it's the govt." and yet the explanation is high school level science.

1
llamatr0n 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know exactly how NNs work. I have built them myself - even doing the back propagation for training by hand (with a calculator).

and, as it happens, my if...then is exactly how NNs work

NNs are function modellers. It would be trivial to train an NN to respond with "I love you too, $user" to the input "I love you computer".

1
llamatr0n 1 point ago +1 / -0

yeah I saw that.

if input = "I love you computer" then print "I love you too, $user"

2
llamatr0n 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is no AI "self".

Any more than your pocket calculator or digital watch has a "self"

3
llamatr0n 3 points ago +3 / -0

no. I'm someone who has read the posts in this community every day for years

1
llamatr0n 1 point ago +1 / -0

makes conspiracy theorists look like retards

playing on easy mode

1
llamatr0n 1 point ago +1 / -0

search google for long enough and eventually, google searches you

2
llamatr0n 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol, OPEC literally agrees on the rate of production to keep the oil price stable. It's one of the most manipulated markets on earth.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›