Nitpicking but i think TPTB see it more as eugenics (reducing the boomer diabetes population) and getting to test out mRNA tech. Some kids dying is just collateral damage and needed for vax liability, but not the main goal. Although it could be just chance/natural their lab virus didn't target kids.
Normies are being told its bad. Billionaire man bad. The journalists aka actors are scared because it used to be their safe haven circle jerk.
I'd recommend listening to the "no agenda" podcast. Here is a 1 minute super cut https://noagendaassets.com/enc/1651176056.488_m5mlosingitoverelontwittersupercut.mp3
That is money for american jobs. Hard workers like Hunter biden.
Because i was not arguing as much as trying to learn. From a global point of view, in the current state of affairs, i'll concede to your point this is a net negative. I honestly forgot about twitters anti-tyranny uses in other countries.
If Twitter eliminates anonymity many people will stop using it.
From a US pov, i see this as a net positive for twitter to fail. I dont think the company can turn around from its censoring ways.
I dont see censorship increasing nor decreasing based on anonymity. If anything, I'd imagine censorship is easier if the mod is anonymous and if they can group-ban real users with anon bots. That said, I'm not really against anonymity. If this website required ID, i probably wouldnt use it. Just if owners of a private company want members not to be anonymous, I'm also not against that. I could be swayed but so far, i dont see it.
Of course for now, places like wikileaks still need to exist. I'm just not bought in to the idea that people really find truths on twitter or how lack of privacy on twitter could make that shit sandwich worse. I imagine it primarily removes the bots and glowies. Or at least makes it a little harder for em.
Inside your home sure. In a town square, most of us already gave away privacy to our smartphones, neighbors Ring videos, etc. Unless you're out in farmland.
De-anon twitter will not completely lose your privacy on the internet. Just the potential for most of it (assuming twit gets more popular and sites choose to go with integrated logins and tracking). And trumps or other alternative never take off.
My point is in some year 3000, i can see right to life being considered a more inalienable right than privacy in a (in your view, distopian) town implementing cameras everywhere resulting in a much lower crime rate and a 0-unresolved-crime rate.
No but im open to ideas. Apart from kiddie porn, i havent heard much about ISP giving up privacy. Seems that most gave up on the copyright torrenting stuff but i havent read or thought much on it. Ideally ISP would be transparent and open to lawsuits about their enforcement. And/or people would just pick ISP that respect privacy. And yea, the areas where you only have a single ISP could be screwed but they are probably used to the shit service already. I've always been biased toward just relocating.
Unpopular opinion but future being non-privacy is a good thing. But only if it starts at the top with politicians/media. Think of how many power hungry cops were exposed from cameras. It is overall a net positive (yes, there is not enough punishment for the epstein "glitches" and cops turning it off). Also, that being said, if it starts at the bottom like China, then it sucks.
Shit happens. Like those twins who share a body (2 heads). They got a relatively normal life teaching and driver license.
I suspect it is this in combination with women waiting until they are older age to have kids but I have not seen the data.
are you controlled opposition or what? if you injected those # of people with saline, you would still get nearly all these adverse events reported. It needs to be compared to a control group with actual numbers. The clot shots are obviously a net negative but brainless observations like your post don't help.
Explaining a more realistic motive is not apologizing. Stop trying to get Biden elected again by looking like an angsty 14-yr-old to moderates. Just because the other side can't tell the difference between murder and involuntary manslaughter (Chauvin) doesn't mean you should stoop to their level.
Illegal, incompetent, yes. Destroying? Not exactly. Unless you're a glowie, strawmanning them as destroyers accomplishes nothing but the reverse of what you want.
Their main mission is to acquire their own wealth and virtue signal that they are helping the global population. Destruction (even of the groups they claim to help) is a byproduct. They are as much destroyers as much as "all Republicans are racist", "all cops are pigs", "all antivaxers believe its microchips and covid/flu doesnt exist". Most of them don't approve of antifa. Destruction is even a bit of stretch as half of them just want "fairness". Its just not "fair" that white male on average makes more money than female. Facts like males work longer hours are irrelevant to them. And yes, the other half of them just want more hand outs/loot/pharmaceutical kickbacks as much as they can.
Most supported BLM because they figured it was beneficial to their power in the long run and the cool thing to do. Not that they actually wanted to destroy whitey.
"People can blow hot and cold" means how people change their mind (esp based on their environment). "Bullpens" could be stretched as a baseball reference to where the next leader comes from. (like WEF Young global leaders)
Would need a proper translator as its possible the original entry is poorly translated to begin with. Also, fuck xi jinping the pooh.
There is plenty to lose. No one wants to get fucked by Bubba in a cell because they participated in a 100 man larp.
Faggot. Not even in minecraft would any pedo ever come peacefully. There is a 4chin post about forming small armed groups (i think it was 5 but certainly less than 10) with a common goal. A group of 100 would easily be shut down/false flagged by glowies.
Kiddie porn? You'd probably take more months to plant it than the sentence they'd get. Most judges are like jackson brown and would give the most lenient sentence possible. if the case ever even made it so far against a LEO/elite.
The group would get no public support so you'd find yourself killed or locked up worst than those Jan6. Even if the public approved like Assange, his future still dont look so bright. Same for Canadian truckers. Who would you even go after? No chance getting a biden between the alphabets monitoring this post and the SS. Most of the public believes bill gates and the clintons are heros and epstein killed himself. The pedos arent taking the general public's kids, they are taking powerless kids. And you could take out all the rothchilds and soros but replacements would crop up (perhaps with even more public support) as they probably have unnamed masters. GL tho.
Kaczynski? World is a better place without a retarded autist pussy bombing colleges. I'm with you on Bundy Ranch tho. Rittenhouse obviously bad example as it proves we dont live in tyranny controlled by media. Assange/snowden/jan 6 better examples.
Nothing gonna happen from the looks of it. From 4chan "I've picked the elementary school On Monday the Esperanza Elementary School will be my target, located at 680 Little St, Los Angeles, CA 90017 Again, thank you all for the replies and bring me ammo to 45855 Kaiser Road, Desert Center, CA Just drop the ammo by the shed (I live in the shed on the property)".
Must be retarded (and will be caught before that) or expected glowie/troll fake.
From the 4chan thread. "This is totally not Twitch and Discord "trust and safety" team desperately trying to justify their existence. Definitely not."
I'd be in that percentage sadly. I'd see that as a baby step in the right direction. And prefer it over weasel fauci lying about gain-of-function etc. and changing definitions and never admitting fault. Them being held accountable still feels so many steps away.
Tweet has been deleted. Should probably stick to screenshotting and then providing the source link and/or archive link to also avoid sending traffic to twitter.
What do you think of the hypothesis that we developed most of covid already at fort detrick or elsewhere, and then wuhan was picked specifically because it had the most history of leaks.
Also wondering if this will expedite that fed "central bank digital currency" to replace other cryptos.
Interesting to discover what are the conspiracies vs coincidences. I have read that the HIV inserts are obviously man-made (although there are common legitimate non-bio-weapon purposes for doing this, ex. working on a new HIV treatment)
My guess is they were/are illegal because retarded bureaucrats think the Breaking Bads and George Floyds of the world would use the test strips to help get high (shieet dis da gud stuff. Tested better than last batch). There maybe some merit but I don't agree with it. Probably the same retards that think gun free zones (without proper security) work.