We are done here. Dumbass.
Try to avoid ad hominem. It is the last resort of the intellectually feeble. Attack the thought! Never the thinker!
Simple proof it moves look at the pyramids.
Bong rips and bad tv take their toll my friend. The pyramids don't show anything about the magnetic field, obviously. "True north" isn't magnetic north, and there is no reason to expect that it was when the pyramids were built either.
Believe what Google inputs multiple sources.
No! Believe nothing! Belief has no place in knowledge, especially scientific, and is across purposes to objective study of any kind.
Aside fucko this site has restorted to shadow banning.
Has it? I expected as much, but I have no solid evidence of it and haven't bothered to look into it. Do you have any evidence to support this?
You are a Nigger
You ain't never had a friend nigger like me!
Nothing you have argued is scientific
That's true, and I'm not arguing. I'm stating the fact that there is no scientific support for your highly advertised (not coincidence, and not free) and widely believed views. If you want to discuss the science, provide some to evaluate! In fact, I've made a community specifically for that exact purpose! I love science, which is why it makes me sad to see so few people understand it.
I said research it.
I have! That's how I know it's nonsense!
You don't believe in nuclear weapons either.
That's true. I endeavor to excise belief where it does not belong, like knowledge (especially scientific). You could know, as I do, that nuclear weapons are entirely fear porn propaganda with no reality beyond the television screen. I can share my knowledge and approach with you - merely ask!
You're trying to convince me of a baseless opinion.
Absolutely not! I am sharing my views, and stating facts. I don't want you to remain confused, and believing in such pseudoscience nonsense - but I also don't want to manipulate you (which convincing is an example of). I want you to know, and to know how to validate and discern between science and pseudoscience!
You also restorted to ad hominem above.
Did I? Could you please quote the statement I made so that I may apologize properly and avoid such things in the future? I work very hard to mercilessly attack the thought, but never the thinker... Still, I am not perfect and make mistakes :(
It is massively within the last couple decades speeding up, the movement of it, its location, as the Earth's magnetic shield weakens. Simply type it into Google.
Then believe whatever google directs you to! Not a good research process my friend.
There is no "massive acceleration", no "pole shift", no massive waning of the magnetic field. It's all f*cking pseudoscience horseshit.
But I am not convincing somebody who hasn't researched it.
I have researched it thoroughly. That's how I KNOW it's bullshit. You should do the same, but you may need to learn what science is first - otherwise you will accept all manner of nonsense misrepresented under its guise (as you clearly have).
Also why did the massive price increase on gas already happen prior to any of this nonsense in the ukraine?
Oh yeah, because brandon is incompetent at everything, including lying!
In fact it has been rapidly speeding up since 2000. Where the North Pole, True North is shifting. Meanwhile the Earth's magnetic field is also severely weakening.
Utter nonsense. There was no pole reversal in the distant past, nor in 2001 when casey predicted, incorrectly, it would occur.
It's all REALLY stupid.
The location of true magnetic north does supposedly vary (slightly). As does the local field strength at any point on earth. Anyone who claims they understand why is lying and/or deluded.
Thank you for attending my ted talk.
https://archive.ph/0Fb0s (your link doesn't seem to be accessible outside the us :()
Can anyone share the video please? Archive.is doesn't seem to do that :(
No way!
CASEY *** AD 2001: Earth's Magnetic Pole Shift.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure I remember when that happened. All hail the prophet and his infallible prophecies!
He should know better than to try that shit with me in future.
Honestly, I insulted (not really, but from your perspective) beardon! NOT you! I have not, nor will I start, insulting you!
Bro I wouldn't bother arguing with jack.
That's true. Argument is for idiots. I only engage in rational discourse. If you think you are debating or in an argument when speaking with me, you are confused and pissing in the wind.
He tries to "win" the argument by pissing you off and thats it
It saddens me that you may actually believe that. I have only the intention to share and to discuss, the "inflaming" happens organically. Take this thread for instance. The "insults" (actually valid criticisms and conclusions bore of research) were directed at beardon, but "TheScience" mistook that for personal attack against them :( Misunderstandings are easy, and communication is hard.
You can't "win" a discussion, but you can lose the plot and the point of it. I seek to discuss, not "win"! As I've said to you before, there is no judge and no audience - it is just us, struggling to communicate!
I may be wrong, but I don't believe he ever released certain key details which would need to be replicated in order for it to work.
That's because he was a fraud. Scientists publish their findings for replication! Especially when it is important and could save the world!
It's not that simple.
Yes, it is.
It's called "put up or shut up". Can you please just do one or the other? Pretty please?
+1 hear hear!
Now that he finally has funding and a team again, it's going to be very exciting to see what new developments he makes.
You mean for the first time in his life, considering he's made 0 developments up to now.
You are most welcome to prove me wrong by providing one such development!
Oh eric (and bsf), we miss you.
Meth got him.
Very sad :(
Perhaps you should attempt to learn the science involved before assuming it's invalid.
Good advice! Now, why won't you share this science so we can do that? Bearden has no science to share, I've already determined that.
But assuming my determination is in error, can you provide some science? Pretty please with sugar on top?
Holy anointment oil, obviously!
That's a good point, we don't wipe drives anymore. Just toss those suckers in the fire along with the paper trail!
Safety first!
And make sure you wipe the hard drives and burn all the paperwork.
You know, for safety!
I only discovered him years after learning the science his devices are based on.
I'm intrigued! What science are you talking about?
stupid people already have all the answers.” – Socrates
It actually is that simple. - You
If you gain a complete understanding of something ... the knowledge speaks for itself. - Also you
Now, I am not calling you stupid - socrates is! I am an earnest student. Please share with me your depth of knowledge on this topic.
I have likewise spent countless hours researching this fraud, and his utter lack of scientific ability or product. If I am in error, I should like to know! Socrates is my favorite, and (evidently unlike you) I am never done learning (or correcting what I have mislearned in the past) nor have a "complete understanding" of anything!
Come on! Share the science! Don't hoard it all to yourself like a greedy dragon!
If I had the solution to the energy crisis, I would give it to you freely brother or sister! Don't leave me hangin'!
Sure thing buddy. You're feel that you're special and not like everyone else.
You misunderstand, I'm not like the other people you are mistaking me for. There are lots of others like me!
Your actions speak louder than your words.
This is a conversation. There are only words here. This is a perplexing statement in this context. Speaking of actions, why aren't you just supplying the science that bearden has contributed?
If you gain a complete understanding of something, you no longer have to resort to bind belief, as the knowledge speaks for itself.
If only it were so simple! So then you completely understand bearden's "science" and can replicate and explain it thoroughly? Lay it on me, brother or sister!
It's literally your ad hom that I threw back at you.
You misunderstand. We are having a conversation. There has been no attack against you, just your guru. And that "attack" was merely a fair representation of the facts and a conclusion of my research into their repeated and egregious fraud. As I said, I may be wrong! Help me see the error of my ways! I am sincere and earnest, and will not spit meaningless insult at you as you have done.
You've given me more than enough reason not to.
Just for insulting your guru? Why not clear his name! It shouldn't be too hard. Just provide this "science" you've been going on about!
If you want to know the truth, you can take the time to learn for yourself.
I have! I have listened to and evaluated the fraud beardon's "work"/"science". But as I said, perhaps I made a mistake! Perhaps I was in a bad mood! Maybe I didn't know enough about science at the time I made the determination! Help me out!
I don't really want you to change my mind (that's not something anyone can do), I want you - assuming you are interested - to share this "science" so we can evaluate it earnestly!
If you have a scientific mind you are downvoted to hell 'round here.
Badge of honor, if you ask me!
This is what the "I am the science" scammers have caused
I think the widespread scientific illiteracy also plays a large part in creating an environment where they can thrive. The people who attend these "conventions" are impressed by the bullshit, and don't know enough about science to evaluate it or criticize it properly.
He contributed a lot more than you
Nope. We've contributed exactly the same, which is to say - nothing!
based on nothing more than your unwavering belief
As I said, I'm not like the others. I identify and destroy belief where it does not belong, like in knowledge, especially scientific. Like your belief in your guru bearden, for instance. I can't destroy it for you, but perhaps I can help you to identify it!
You are in fact the moron and fraud
Try to avoid ad hominem if you can. It is the last resort of the intellectually feeble. Attack the thought! Never the thinker!
as the models are provable incomplete
Models aren't science. As I said, I am not like the others.
I won't waste energy on trying to change your mind, as it's clear that your mind is made up
My mind is made up because of my research into bearden and his egregious fraud. Maybe I'm wrong? Maybe I've been misinformed? Maybe you have scientific proof that he's not a fraud? I have been wrong many times before, it will not be a new experience for me. Let me have it! Change my mind!
I am an earnest student, and not the strawman caricature that you initially lumped me into by mistake.
I forgot about the meathead stuff. Valid point!
I hear he was a good bouncer working at the bar too.
Just not someone that can speak with "expertise" on most any academic subject. He's, by default, out of his depth.
being impossible due to the laws of physics.
I am not like the other ones. I actually understand the laws of physics, where they come from, and how/why. Things are never impossible because the "laws" say so. That is a profoundly stupid belief and lays bare a depressingly feeble grasp on physics and science.
because anyone else who falls in this category already believes that
Belief has no place in knowledge, least of all scientific, and is directly across purposes to objective study of any kind (it's called bias)
I assure you that this technology is very real
No, it isn't. At least not what bearden the fraud was peddling. Change my mind!
If anyone is genuinely interested in learning more about the suppressed science or suppressed technologies that exploit it, ask me anything!
Have you built a perpetual motion machine following bearden's instructions? If so, how long has it been running without intervention or charging/fuel (that you add) of any sort?
Also, would you consider discussing this topic further on the community I created specifically for such discussions? This is a wonderful example, and its thorough evaluation and research approach(es) to validating bearden's claims could be very useful to others!
Tom Bearden was a genius
Incorrect. He was a largely talentless moron and fraud. He never contributed a single thing of value to science whatsoever. He also stole a lot of money and time from a lot of people, and so was a common thief to boot.
Change my mind (by supplying something of value to science that he did contribute)!
I presume this is the US funded biolab in the ukraine that has direct funding ties to hunter (papa brandon's crackhead "shell company" / "purse wife").
Debate is base pageantry for sycophantic fools. Intelligent people prefer rational discourse and earnest study. You might give it a try!
That's true. I just stated the facts. Did you offer any proof? I forget...
As i said, if you want to discuss the science - provide some science! I'd be happy to!
Argument is for idiots. I just engage in rational discourse! I don't want to manipulate you!
Could you please quote when I used such ad hominem? As I said, I work very hard to avoid that sort of thing, and if I owe you an apology or am to do any better you have to point out what I said!
That's right. Ad hominem is insult. I have not insulted you. Right?
Life is absurd! So is the claim that the magnetic field is waning and/or the poles are "reversing". It's all very stupid, and completely untrue. It has no scientific support whatsoever. Just fyi!