Incorrect. He was a largely talentless moron and fraud. He never contributed a single thing of value to science whatsoever. He also stole a lot of money and time from a lot of people, and so was a common thief to boot.
Change my mind (by supplying something of value to science that he did contribute)!
Bro I wouldn't bother arguing with jack. I've debated this guy before and all he does is pretend like hes some genius with more knowledge than you and never actually talks about his facts or even sources anything. Its just pilpul all the way down, and he's great at it too. He tries to "win" the argument by pissing you off and thats it, he doesn't care about the facts or imparting knowledge to others, just claims he does. All he does is character defame.
I'm sure he'll comment and try to trick me into a debate too but the only way to win is to not play.
Incorrect. He was a largely talentless moron and fraud. He never contributed a single thing of value to science whatsoever. He also stole a lot of money and time from a lot of people, and so was a common thief to boot.
Change my mind (by supplying something of value to science that he did contribute)!
Bro I wouldn't bother arguing with jack. I've debated this guy before and all he does is pretend like hes some genius with more knowledge than you and never actually talks about his facts or even sources anything. Its just pilpul all the way down, and he's great at it too. He tries to "win" the argument by pissing you off and thats it, he doesn't care about the facts or imparting knowledge to others, just claims he does. All he does is character defame.
I'm sure he'll comment and try to trick me into a debate too but the only way to win is to not play.
Honestly, I insulted (not really, but from your perspective) beardon! NOT you! I have not, nor will I start, insulting you!