That's true. Argument is for idiots. I only engage in rational discourse. If you think you are debating or in an argument when speaking with me, you are confused and pissing in the wind.
He tries to "win" the argument by pissing you off and thats it
It saddens me that you may actually believe that. I have only the intention to share and to discuss, the "inflaming" happens organically. Take this thread for instance. The "insults" (actually valid criticisms and conclusions bore of research) were directed at beardon, but "TheScience" mistook that for personal attack against them :( Misunderstandings are easy, and communication is hard.
You can't "win" a discussion, but you can lose the plot and the point of it. I seek to discuss, not "win"! As I've said to you before, there is no judge and no audience - it is just us, struggling to communicate!
That's true. Argument is for idiots. I only engage in rational discourse. If you think you are debating or in an argument when speaking with me, you are confused and pissing in the wind.
It saddens me that you may actually believe that. I have only the intention to share and to discuss, the "inflaming" happens organically. Take this thread for instance. The "insults" (actually valid criticisms and conclusions bore of research) were directed at beardon, but "TheScience" mistook that for personal attack against them :( Misunderstandings are easy, and communication is hard.
You can't "win" a discussion, but you can lose the plot and the point of it. I seek to discuss, not "win"! As I've said to you before, there is no judge and no audience - it is just us, struggling to communicate!