Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

9
12,000 year old city discovered off Louisiana Coast: "Crescantis" (www.wwltv.com)
posted 3 years ago by Scutigera_coleoptrat 3 years ago by Scutigera_coleoptrat +11 / -3
16 comments share
16 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– jack4455667788 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

We are done here. Dumbass.

Try to avoid ad hominem. It is the last resort of the intellectually feeble. Attack the thought! Never the thinker!

Simple proof it moves look at the pyramids.

Bong rips and bad tv take their toll my friend. The pyramids don't show anything about the magnetic field, obviously. "True north" isn't magnetic north, and there is no reason to expect that it was when the pyramids were built either.

Believe what Google inputs multiple sources.

No! Believe nothing! Belief has no place in knowledge, especially scientific, and is across purposes to objective study of any kind.

Aside fucko this site has restorted to shadow banning.

Has it? I expected as much, but I have no solid evidence of it and haven't bothered to look into it. Do you have any evidence to support this?

You are a Nigger

You ain't never had a friend nigger like me!

Nothing you have argued is scientific

That's true, and I'm not arguing. I'm stating the fact that there is no scientific support for your highly advertised (not coincidence, and not free) and widely believed views. If you want to discuss the science, provide some to evaluate! In fact, I've made a community specifically for that exact purpose! I love science, which is why it makes me sad to see so few people understand it.

I said research it.

I have! That's how I know it's nonsense!

You don't believe in nuclear weapons either.

That's true. I endeavor to excise belief where it does not belong, like knowledge (especially scientific). You could know, as I do, that nuclear weapons are entirely fear porn propaganda with no reality beyond the television screen. I can share my knowledge and approach with you - merely ask!

You're trying to convince me of a baseless opinion.

Absolutely not! I am sharing my views, and stating facts. I don't want you to remain confused, and believing in such pseudoscience nonsense - but I also don't want to manipulate you (which convincing is an example of). I want you to know, and to know how to validate and discern between science and pseudoscience!

You also restorted to ad hominem above.

Did I? Could you please quote the statement I made so that I may apologize properly and avoid such things in the future? I work very hard to mercilessly attack the thought, but never the thinker... Still, I am not perfect and make mistakes :(

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Ep0ch 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

You have said nothing. Nothing worthy of debate. No offered proof. Or even a counter argument. But you have blindly refuted fact. Where instead you get emotional. You have only offered, ad hominem. Somehow your choice of paraphrasing is better. Because you haven't insulted. Where you must have assumed that I needed your idiocy telling me anything. No nigger, fuck off. You aren't even worth the effort of wiping your bullshit off of my shoe. It is absurd.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– jack4455667788 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Nothing worthy of debate

Debate is base pageantry for sycophantic fools. Intelligent people prefer rational discourse and earnest study. You might give it a try!

No offered proof

That's true. I just stated the facts. Did you offer any proof? I forget...

As i said, if you want to discuss the science - provide some science! I'd be happy to!

Or even a counter argument

Argument is for idiots. I just engage in rational discourse! I don't want to manipulate you!

You have only offered, ad hominem

Could you please quote when I used such ad hominem? As I said, I work very hard to avoid that sort of thing, and if I owe you an apology or am to do any better you have to point out what I said!

Because you haven't insulted

That's right. Ad hominem is insult. I have not insulted you. Right?

It is absurd.

Life is absurd! So is the claim that the magnetic field is waning and/or the poles are "reversing". It's all very stupid, and completely untrue. It has no scientific support whatsoever. Just fyi!

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - ptjlq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy