I am not like the other ones. I actually understand the laws of physics, where they come from, and how/why. Things are never impossible because the "laws" say so. That is a profoundly stupid belief and lays bare a depressingly feeble grasp on physics and science.
because anyone else who falls in this category already believes that
Belief has no place in knowledge, least of all scientific, and is directly across purposes to objective study of any kind (it's called bias)
I assure you that this technology is very real
No, it isn't. At least not what bearden the fraud was peddling. Change my mind!
If anyone is genuinely interested in learning more about the suppressed science or suppressed technologies that exploit it, ask me anything!
Have you built a perpetual motion machine following bearden's instructions? If so, how long has it been running without intervention or charging/fuel (that you add) of any sort?
Also, would you consider discussing this topic further on the community I created specifically for such discussions? This is a wonderful example, and its thorough evaluation and research approach(es) to validating bearden's claims could be very useful to others!
If you have a scientific mind you are downvoted to hell 'round here. I like excepticism but they should not doubt the method, they should doubt the experiment or the man who carried it out. This is what the "I am the science" scammers have caused
I am not like the other ones. I actually understand the laws of physics, where they come from, and how/why. Things are never impossible because the "laws" say so. That is a profoundly stupid belief and lays bare a depressingly feeble grasp on physics and science.
Belief has no place in knowledge, least of all scientific, and is directly across purposes to objective study of any kind (it's called bias)
No, it isn't. At least not what bearden the fraud was peddling. Change my mind!
Have you built a perpetual motion machine following bearden's instructions? If so, how long has it been running without intervention or charging/fuel (that you add) of any sort?
Also, would you consider discussing this topic further on the community I created specifically for such discussions? This is a wonderful example, and its thorough evaluation and research approach(es) to validating bearden's claims could be very useful to others!
If you have a scientific mind you are downvoted to hell 'round here. I like excepticism but they should not doubt the method, they should doubt the experiment or the man who carried it out. This is what the "I am the science" scammers have caused
Good advice! Now, why won't you share this science so we can do that? Bearden has no science to share, I've already determined that.
But assuming my determination is in error, can you provide some science? Pretty please with sugar on top?