Incorrect. He was a largely talentless moron and fraud. He never contributed a single thing of value to science whatsoever. He also stole a lot of money and time from a lot of people, and so was a common thief to boot.
Change my mind (by supplying something of value to science that he did contribute)!
Nope. We've contributed exactly the same, which is to say - nothing!
based on nothing more than your unwavering belief
As I said, I'm not like the others. I identify and destroy belief where it does not belong, like in knowledge, especially scientific. Like your belief in your guru bearden, for instance. I can't destroy it for you, but perhaps I can help you to identify it!
You are in fact the moron and fraud
Try to avoid ad hominem if you can. It is the last resort of the intellectually feeble. Attack the thought! Never the thinker!
as the models are provable incomplete
Models aren't science. As I said, I am not like the others.
I won't waste energy on trying to change your mind, as it's clear that your mind is made up
My mind is made up because of my research into bearden and his egregious fraud. Maybe I'm wrong? Maybe I've been misinformed? Maybe you have scientific proof that he's not a fraud? I have been wrong many times before, it will not be a new experience for me. Let me have it! Change my mind!
I am an earnest student, and not the strawman caricature that you initially lumped me into by mistake.
Sure thing buddy. You're feel that you're special and not like everyone else.
You misunderstand, I'm not like the other people you are mistaking me for. There are lots of others like me!
Your actions speak louder than your words.
This is a conversation. There are only words here. This is a perplexing statement in this context. Speaking of actions, why aren't you just supplying the science that bearden has contributed?
If you gain a complete understanding of something, you no longer have to resort to bind belief, as the knowledge speaks for itself.
If only it were so simple! So then you completely understand bearden's "science" and can replicate and explain it thoroughly? Lay it on me, brother or sister!
It's literally your ad hom that I threw back at you.
You misunderstand. We are having a conversation. There has been no attack against you, just your guru. And that "attack" was merely a fair representation of the facts and a conclusion of my research into their repeated and egregious fraud. As I said, I may be wrong! Help me see the error of my ways! I am sincere and earnest, and will not spit meaningless insult at you as you have done.
You've given me more than enough reason not to.
Just for insulting your guru? Why not clear his name! It shouldn't be too hard. Just provide this "science" you've been going on about!
If you want to know the truth, you can take the time to learn for yourself.
I have! I have listened to and evaluated the fraud beardon's "work"/"science". But as I said, perhaps I made a mistake! Perhaps I was in a bad mood! Maybe I didn't know enough about science at the time I made the determination! Help me out!
I don't really want you to change my mind (that's not something anyone can do), I want you - assuming you are interested - to share this "science" so we can evaluate it earnestly!
Incorrect. He was a largely talentless moron and fraud. He never contributed a single thing of value to science whatsoever. He also stole a lot of money and time from a lot of people, and so was a common thief to boot.
Change my mind (by supplying something of value to science that he did contribute)!
Nope. We've contributed exactly the same, which is to say - nothing!
As I said, I'm not like the others. I identify and destroy belief where it does not belong, like in knowledge, especially scientific. Like your belief in your guru bearden, for instance. I can't destroy it for you, but perhaps I can help you to identify it!
Try to avoid ad hominem if you can. It is the last resort of the intellectually feeble. Attack the thought! Never the thinker!
Models aren't science. As I said, I am not like the others.
My mind is made up because of my research into bearden and his egregious fraud. Maybe I'm wrong? Maybe I've been misinformed? Maybe you have scientific proof that he's not a fraud? I have been wrong many times before, it will not be a new experience for me. Let me have it! Change my mind!
I am an earnest student, and not the strawman caricature that you initially lumped me into by mistake.
You misunderstand, I'm not like the other people you are mistaking me for. There are lots of others like me!
This is a conversation. There are only words here. This is a perplexing statement in this context. Speaking of actions, why aren't you just supplying the science that bearden has contributed?
If only it were so simple! So then you completely understand bearden's "science" and can replicate and explain it thoroughly? Lay it on me, brother or sister!
You misunderstand. We are having a conversation. There has been no attack against you, just your guru. And that "attack" was merely a fair representation of the facts and a conclusion of my research into their repeated and egregious fraud. As I said, I may be wrong! Help me see the error of my ways! I am sincere and earnest, and will not spit meaningless insult at you as you have done.
Just for insulting your guru? Why not clear his name! It shouldn't be too hard. Just provide this "science" you've been going on about!
I have! I have listened to and evaluated the fraud beardon's "work"/"science". But as I said, perhaps I made a mistake! Perhaps I was in a bad mood! Maybe I didn't know enough about science at the time I made the determination! Help me out!
I don't really want you to change my mind (that's not something anyone can do), I want you - assuming you are interested - to share this "science" so we can evaluate it earnestly!