2
jack4455667788 2 points ago +2 / -0

You'll feel much better after a good bleeding!

by jdqw210
1
jack4455667788 1 point ago +1 / -0

You may want to check out the community I created specifically to discuss such questions!

Sadly we don't have much more than speculation on this though.

In my view, the most likely answer is that they are balloons in an actual swirling sky above us (not appearing to rotate because the world is; actually rotating because the sky is!)

Still, there are many anecdotes about people not being able to use satellite phones when they are too far away from terrestrial broadcast towers and centers of population density (cities, towns etc.)

The vast majority of all data traffic is by cable, and that will not change in the foreseeable future (until/unless the cables are destroyed, that is...)

2
jack4455667788 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is low IQ conspiracy theory.

There are many that think all conspiracy theories are "low IQ" and the people that fall for them are stupid, gullible, and crazy. Surely you don't agree with them right?

I suppose you think earth is flat too.

I think the earth is not spherical, and that that proposed shape is not among those reasonable/possible or consistent with science. You may be interested in joining us on the community I created specifically to discuss such things! You likely know nothing of flat earth research beyond the (largely) youtube psyop and its useful idiots repeating stupid things so you'll never evaluate it seriously...

5
jack4455667788 5 points ago +5 / -0

Psychology is largely irreproducible pseudoscience, but the last I checked into it schizophrenia (multiple personality disorder) was ONLY caused by sexual abuse/trauma - typically as a child.

0
jack4455667788 0 points ago +1 / -1

If you really want to understand you might want to check out conpro. It's there specifically for people like you.

If your worldview is race oriented, you are a racist, and conpro is the community for you!

It isn't what you think it is, nor are the reasons for its existence.

I agree that generalization is to be avoided, as are stereotypes, along with the profound racism which people like yourself exhibit and encourage.

Why not discuss it with them? They will positively love you there. You are just like them!

1
jack4455667788 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes, because they can dumbfuck. You can't.

Deciding which words can be said by the color of a persons skin (or lineage/heritage/breeding stock) is profoundly racist.

Why do you support and encourage such wonton and unashamed racism?

1
jack4455667788 1 point ago +1 / -0

Magick is like organic science that is hard to explain.

There is only one kind of science, and there isn't much "organic" about it beyond it was created by organic beings - us.

Magick is only smoke and mirrors (which often are derived through science)

1
jack4455667788 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gatekeeping IS censorship, though I agree that it is important to defend yourself, your home, and the people you love.

Real gates have arguable justified uses, thought-gates/speech-gates never do.

2
jack4455667788 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree that was an abuse of the tag function - but I am not aware of any formalized rules regarding it here.

They didn't determine who made threats etc. That would have required them to read the posts, and risk actually learning something.

Instead they searched for words/phrases. Anyone that said any of their "trigger word" [censorship] list, most likely.

1
jack4455667788 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am against all "racism" and more importantly pride/elitism/ignorance[evil] that is intended to be fostered/encouraged through its advertisement.

I am against slavers.

1
jack4455667788 1 point ago +1 / -0

And we have the right and ability to do it!

As for banning, we can do that too but only in the communities we moderate - of course.

Banning is another (in many ways the ultimate) form of censorship that I detest. I use it only as a last resort when sparing the rod is spoiling the child, and am quick to offer amnesty and forgiveness for those that earnestly seek it.

3
jack4455667788 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's a difference between freedom of speech and starting shit for no reason.

Not if that "starting shit" is simply free speech. Arguably there is a reason, we presume bennington is capable of such higher cognition - though there IS reason to doubt it.

Putting a megaphone in public and saying 'nigger nigger' is not the same as

I agree, but noise ordinance laws will often take care of that megaphone - leaving you with just the free speech.

breaking someone's window and directing it into their house.

Again, vandalism should cover that. Their freedom to unencumbered speech is and should be guaranteed, their right to noise pollute and vandalism - not so much.

I hear you, and it does feel a bit like they "kicked in the door to your hovel" - and certainly hacking conpro (assuming that happened) is an example of that for which they arguably should face punishment. Likewise the repeated harassment of users through clear and wonton abuse of the tag function, and the express/ostensible intent to dox and harass users whose names they collected here ought to equally be swiftly punished.

Still, the right to come here, start shit, and collect usernames (without explicitly announcing plans to use them for illegal purposes) ought to be fine. That's all freedom of speech, and freely available information.

We are equally free to brigade the shit out of them, make endless work for them and their mod teams, express our displeasure in almost any way we please (as long as it is through our shared freedom of speech) and by far the best approach - block, ignore, and report them til the cows come home.

Always starve a troll. They thrive on conflict. (Or give them heaping helpings of kindness; they can't tolerate it.)

1
jack4455667788 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, the CIA is full of morons.

It's a real problem... Unlike "magick" which is merely smoke and mirrors.

They even paid uri gellar. Clowns.

11
jack4455667788 11 points ago +11 / -0

It doesn't just look like one, it IS one.

Looks like someone upset about conpro because they don't understand it.

1
jack4455667788 1 point ago +3 / -2

Now now, freedom of speech is a two way street!

I know you WANT to censor bennington, but you can't if you really hate censorship...

Do you see the paradox of your position?

Anyhow, trolls gonna troll. Whatchu gonna do?

3
jack4455667788 3 points ago +3 / -0

Absolutely! It would be my pleasure brotha!

The computer is a glorified abacus. It is not, fundamentally, any more complicated than that nor capable of anything beyond that.

The only AI that exists today is as a result of rules (and human slavery). Rules that are painstakingly made by humans primarily through trial and error. The computer can follow those rules, and even come up with new ones based on (aforementioned) pre-programmed rules to do so.

The only such "AI" systems that exist (or can exist) require constant maintenance and human intervention. They always will.

Whenever you hear "deep learning", "AI", "machine learning" etc. you are almost exclusively hearing a stupid and/or lying person trying to con investors. Tune it out, it's all fiction.

We can probably figure out a way to wire a brain to a computer, to make the human interventions quicker and more dystopian/horrific/demonic - but the "ghost in the shell" will remain entertainment and fantasy. There is no "singularity", that is also entirely fictional and once again, that is its sole origin!

Will we have the "computer" from star trek? Yes.

Will it be capable of human thought, of course not! But it will be a useful tool. Like an abacus.

As usual, disagree and/or share any thoughts!

3
jack4455667788 3 points ago +3 / -0

AI is completely fictional. It isn't real today, and it will never be real in the future. Ama!

Quantum computing IS real, and is particularly useful for optimization problems - NOT anything and everything.

5
jack4455667788 5 points ago +5 / -0

Love him or hate him, it's C's barbecue and it tastes good (less good now, but nothing gold can stay)

C may be replaced, infiltrated, or just reveal their true colors at some point - but so far, they have done admirably and will not capitulate to morons like swamprangers.

1
jack4455667788 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good riddance. He never contributed a single thing of value to science. Just wasted a lot of peoples time promising fantasy.

And RIP.

by pkvi
4
jack4455667788 4 points ago +6 / -2

That's right! Moon landing(s) were pure hollywood. Nothing more.

Are you ready to join our discussion? It seems like you might be warming up...

I've created a community specifically for the critical exploration of such topics!

You are most welcome, in any case! As are all others who are earnest!

1
jack4455667788 1 point ago +2 / -1

Kind of.

I think this is an appropriate response. It's not great in many ways.

I mentioned it because of the goa'uld (regarding the "parasite hypothesis")

1
jack4455667788 1 point ago +2 / -1

Antiparasitic drugs works either by directly intrfering with parasite vital organs, or by depriving parasite from food. (If you know other princilpes - share it with class).

I know that ivermectin, specifically, causes paralysis in the parasites, which then starve to death because they can't eat anymore.

Are you an sg1 fan?

5
jack4455667788 5 points ago +7 / -2

Stop using your national currency and only accept crypto, gold and silver anything of actual value to you (aka trade/barter) is what they fear the most.

Ftfy. Crypto is for stupid people that didn't understand the currency scam in the first instance, and so do not recognize its second coming.

Here is a documentary for you (my apologies for the link) :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5RCfQyTDFI

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›