So can anyone explain how this is possible?
This is possible because the reason the distant boats cannot be seen without magnification/zoom is due to angular resolution limits. As a result, zooming in allows them to meet or exceed the angular resolution limits of the detector/receiver.
If the boats were “beyond the horizon” it would not be possible to zoom in on them as in the video.
do you actually understand how refractions and mirages work?
I think so, yes.
Do you know where this video clip came from? What altitude was it recorded at etc?
Thanks for sharing!
Why are flat-earthers so belligerent?
Because they are largely agents or products of a heavily advertised (i.e. funded) psyop. One of the things it encourages is false enmity between “globetards” and “flattards” to prevent any earnest collaboration, discussion, or evaluation of the subject. Earnest flat earth researchers (depending on personal temperament, of course) are typically not that way.
And the response is always: educate yourself
Well, that’s good advice. Speaking from experience, it can be very tiring when people ask the same 101 question over and over again - especially when a small amount of research could easily answer it.
This is an extremely basic question that you should be able to answer in a few words. In fact, you should be happy to explain it.
I agree.
The (potential) explanation, assuming the world flat, is that when you travel west you are circling the north pole clockwise and when you are traveling east you are circling the north pole counterclockwise.
Any earnest questions you would like to ask - or search to see if they have been answered before - check out the community here called flatearthresearch!
That she had a cia handler as a child and was groomed/forced into child prostitution and drug dealing (large amounts of lsd, most likely supplied by the cia) and has possibly become a handler herself. The documentary / book “drugs as a weapon against us” promotes and supplies evidence for these claims.
Those are gods (and humans who were given “boons” by them), not aliens. Aliens are modern fiction. Gods have been around MUCH longer.
As for scientific explanation - it may be beyond understanding, but i suspect description ought to still be possible in those terms. Certainly ufos (flying craft) function definitely and are built by living entities. There is only one living entity that we know of that builds flying craft though.
I don’t remember that one specifically. I’ve been out of ufology for a while - but it was an interest of mine for a long time.
In my research i concluded that all “alien” conflation with ufo’s is for discrediting/kookification/suppression of discussion, research, and reporting of ufo’s. This began as soon as the modern ufo’s did (“flying saucers”) around the 40’s. Today it is also used on the side to encourage alien worship among the zealots (which serves the former purpose). They are largely the saints of the secular religion of scientism (a la daniken, and many others). Occasionally they were also used for psyop/terrorization purposes (post 80’s)
Aliens are entirely fictional, and do not exist in antiquity. The modern gray we know and love was first depicted/created in the 90’s.
Ufo’s are real, aliens are not.
Maybe the wings are metaphorical, symbolic, or ornamental?
Sometimes a beard is just a beard!
Actual title “Jagten på mig selv”, comprised of 2 episodes. First aired around last new year. Created by “Danish Radio” but is in fact a tv program/documentary.
Anyone have a link to it (preferably with subs)?
It’s truly demonic. No wonder people like ickes say that cold blooded reptiles are the ones in control of it all. No warm blooded human with a soul could ever be so heartless and entirely lack empathy.
I also recommend “drugs as a weapon against us” which is a book and movie that supports the courtney love claims. The other one i recommended deals with project monarch and is a case study involving a specific ex-handler and the woman and her child that he rescued from the program. It also talks a bit about what these child prostitutes are used for.
Yes. :(
The angels weep.
God knows what happens to them “past their prime”, but it appears many of them “graduate” to become handlers/peddlers themselves (the abused become the abusers). Some say this is what happened to courtney love.
I recommend this “documentary” on the subject : “Mind control : American trance”
Just because the pump ejects liquid in a spiral/vortex doesn't mean it isn't a pump!
However, it certainly is an interesting argument that the pressure required to push the volume of blood and blood cells throughout the circulatory system is far too great for the heart. I was also intrigued by the argument about the main outflow artery contracting (as if under vacuum) when the largest volume of flow is traveling within it.
Cowan's video was interesting. Thanks for sharing!
Does the earth really spin?
No. The sky rotates above us.
Airy’s failure is the demonstration/measurement of this.
To those with an interest (including critical) in this question and related topics, please join us on flatearthresearch to exchange our perspectives!
Must everyone be a fag obsessed with “flipping/switching” poles?
God, it’s always pole (-smoking) this and ball (-fondling) that.
There is no evidence to support any pole shift. It is fear porn propaganda.
The sky is falling chicken little!
Agreed.
However, without that same worship of gravity (and other unvalidated assumption required for inference of size of the star) there is no way to determine the size of these “micronova-ing” stars in the first place - which sort of undoes the premise.
Furthermore the worship of gravity and fusion powering stars are both required for the speculation on the cause of supernova in any case.
There isn’t even any solid evidence that the sun is a star. That’s merely another dogma of that same mythological/religious belief structure of scientism you mentioned.
You may be interested to join us on flatearthresearch to further explore and exchange our views!
It's not nonsense
I think it is. But it's besides the point. Tesla never said anything like that - that is the point.
As for mathematical descriptions of vortices - I am incredulous at the claim that they only contain the numbers/magnitudes 3, 6, and 9 (from tesla or anyone else).
Math worship is a scourge. Tesla felt strongly about that as well. Math is merely a symbolic language for description/communication. It is not magical, and secrets are not contained within numbers anymore than they are contained in letters (and for identical reasons).
do you have more info on that statement?
Sure, there is no record in any of tesla's published or otherwise obtainable statements that supports this "secret of 3 6 9" nonsense.
Please feel free to prove me wrong! It does seem to be true that he went massively ocd towards the end (could potentially have been poisoned), and was prone to ostensibly wild claims - but nothing supporting this one. Tesla also loathed the number worshipers (numerologists) and many of his available quotes make this clear. He was a die hard experimentalist / rational positivist.
The character might have said that, but the human being and scientist nikola tesla did not.
Where is this clip from? Anyone have a link to the whole thing?
UFO’s are real. “Aliens” are entirely fiction, and always have been since their creation.
The grey we know and love was first created in the 90’s.
As for hierarchies of “density” as a synonym/corollary for consciousness - i am incredulous. Can you demonstrate a human is on the 3rd level and all other animals are on the 2nd? What are the definitions and criteria of these imagined “levels of density”? The whole thing sounds silly to me.
Wow. I hope this is true.
Has anyone confirmed it?
It certainly seems to check out. Who wrote the original story, and what was it called?
Pedophiles, the lot of them.
Sophistry = Hedonism = Pedophilia
However, the commoners loathed and despised it. It was a "sickness" of the rich and psychopathic, just like today - and for the same reasons.
Atlas shows round Earth pre-America "discovery."
Fun fact : The myth that people used to think the world was flat and needed columbus to set them straight was first created and popularized in the 19th century by the popular fiction author of sleepy hollow and rip van winkle. It is uniquely american.
Since ancient greece virtually every educated person has been taught the world is spherical from childhood.
If you are interested in exploring/discussing such things, you may want to join us over at flatearthresearch!
But if you're actually using your brain, FE is obviously retarded.
Actually, FE (the heavily advertised/funded psyop) is obviously retarded intentionally so that you will never seriously consider (aka use your brain to evaluate) or earnestly discuss the important and valuable subject.
There is no way, in any configuration, that the sun operates in the way we observe it if the Earth is flat
That’s silly. IF the earth is flat, then everything we observe - including the way the sun behaves - occurs on/over a flat earth. It’s a tautology. The shape of the earth obviously isn’t dependent on the motion of the sun above - don’t be silly!
There's simply no way it works.
You keep saying that, but it is very silly. Of course IF the world is flat, it clearly does work - despite your objections. Why do you think it is impossible? You haven’t explained your reasoning as much as you have declared your (mistaken, in my view) position.
but then completely fails to question the ridiculous assumptions required by FE.
There is no unified “FE”. That’s the heavily advertised (i.e. funded) and intentionally offensively stupid psyop! The assumptions you find ridiculous are contrived and advertised specifically to be ridiculous!
FE is a test that many fail
Agreed. Independent validation of claims encountered is not something most of us ever get any good at. We are, instead, conditioned by rote under the guise of education from childhood. This is why people believe the world is spherical in the fist place, and why it is so easy to convince them otherwise.
If you would like to learn about earnest flat earth research (very different to the psyop FE you have experience with), or even just express your criticisms - please join us on flatearthresearch!
Really? I would have thought you’d encountered it before. It’s a fancy term for a simple thing. We can’t see really tiny things - like let’s say single animal cells or bacteria - without magnification. It has to do with the size and spacing of our receptors, and the “processing” from them. The same thing is true of the boat in your video. It is not that there is something in the way, but that the boat is too small for us to see (aka beyond our angular resolution limit) without magnification (the same as the cells and the bacteria and for the same reasons!).
That’s basically right!
This is where the error lies. The boat in your video isn’t “over the curve” yet. That’s why you can zoom in on it and see it again. When the boat is “over the curve” or some of it is obscured/hidden by that “curve” - zooming in won’t work.
We know that it isn’t a curve/hump/hill of water obscuring the distant ship - but most believe it is due to miseducation.
The observation shown in your video doesn’t depend on a flat or spherical (but effectively flat because of the scale we experience) world.