Does anyone have a link to the "trove" that DailyMail is referring to? Why not release it to the public? Also this is probably why the gates affair story just came out, to deflect from the damage these documents would otherwise do.
This newscast is cancer. All I see is greasy man with slicked back hair sensationalizing a headline with no new information for 5 mins. Perfect for retarded viewers I guess.
Questions he didn't answer:
How did contractors work on Tucker's property without objection? My guess is Tucker permitted the work because Fox paid for the set and had the right to take their stuff back.
Alberta is kind of the Texas of Canada.
Cold AF though.
Why is this coming out now? Someone suddenly decided to leak it to the WSJ (who first broke the story)
Maybe it was Epstein himself
It's interesting that the OP didnt actually link to the article but provided a screenshot And no one else was curious enough to actually look for and read the article?
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/05/who-are-the-newly-revealed-jeffrey-epstein-associates.html
Well in that case the triple and quadruple digit readings in the US should be a cause for concern.
God this is a stupid comment. Why are you using this topic to opine how you hate such a pedestrian beer brand? You realize the drop in sales has nothing to do with taste right? It's not like they changed their ingredients or brewing process. I think it tastes like shit too, but guess what, no one gives a fuck.
The real question is are they gonna do a 180 and drop their identity politics and get back to their core advertising roots. Check out the 2023 Bud Light Super Bowl ad, it was actually pretty clever and it has no transgenders.
She is a bit of a weirdo, but she is clearly saying in the context of her rape experience it was nothing like the idea of ravishing/fantasy type rape that some people envision.
This was her in the 90s when she sexual assault allegedly happened. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cB3Eed68kSA
Futures contracts went to 0 for that month's delivery primarily because there was was a storage capacity problem. No one had capacity to take delivery. The govt did have storage capacity and should have taken the opportunity to add to the strategic reserve.
Anyway, anyone who uses an Y axis like that in his video should be taken with skepticism.
I have watched American Moon. I also watched "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon" and read "Moon Man: The True Story of a Filmmaker on the CIA Hit List" You won't win $50 bucks but it did raise some interesting questions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=az9nFrnCK60
I spent some time watching this stabilized footage and you see lunar dust thrown in the air by the rover. So the question is this how you expect dust to act in a vacuum w/ 1/6 of earths gravity? I'm not sure TBH.
WTH? Who the hell would pay to shill the opposite?
That is a good point. You're correct in that no one talks about CGI in the context of the moon landing. Elon is trolling and I read into his point as to meaning we didn't have the technology to fake a moon landing in 1969.
Regardless of whether Kubrick was involved or not, it would have been hard to fake 50+ years ago.
Russians sent a dog there first
They sent a dog to orbit, not to the moon. She didn't make it back alive. :(
I agree with this sentiment. Instead lets look at establishment vs non-establishment and authoritarian vs libertarian.
I don't know what to believe. Elon sort of has a point. The moon footage (specifically the lander footage as Apollo descended to the surface) seems a little difficult to fake in 1969.
On the other hand, the god damn Japanese couldn't successfully land their luner module or transmit live video of the landing when they tried last month.
Parks wasn't the first instance of a black woman standing up to segregation laws. Claudette Colvin was arrested 9 months earlier for refusing to give up her seat to a white woman on a bus in Montgomery, Alabama.
From Wikipedia:
Colvin did not receive the same attention as Parks for a number of reasons: she did not have "good hair", she was not fair-skinned, she was a teenager, she was pregnant. The leaders in the Civil Rights Movement tried to keep up appearances and make the "most appealing" protesters the most seen.
I posted this interview back in April. No one really pays attention to shit I post but I just want to say pay attention to the names Whitney Web calls out and then also the names on JE's personal calendar as reported by the WSJ a week ago. You can start to build a clearer picture of who associated and supported JE throughout his time as a high profile "financier"
I see posts online demanding "the release of the names of JE collaborators". Guys they're right in front of us.
Wait, still? It's not menorah season.
It's not. I need a source on this. Is this equivalent of Christians not taking down their Christmas Tree until July?
David Bowie and the awful puppets made that movie unwatchable. Jim Henson (RIP) should have stuck to the Muppets (and Fraggle Rock)
+1 for casting Jennifer Connelly though
If anyone is wondering where this report came from, I saw an undated PressTV interview with a guy named Gilbert Doctorow who was described as an "Independent International Affairs Analyst".
Gilbert goes into detail on a report of a Russian strike where he claimed 200 high level NATO generals and officers as well as communications infrastructure was wiped out. Supposedly this happened in March, a lot of articles have come out claiming it was debunked. I have no idea whats real, it seems a little sketch though.
Interestingly Ukraine claimed they killed 200 elite soldiers on an attack against Luhansk back in August of 2022.
I won't provide links, just do a little googling to confirm.
I would suggest being skeptical of almost all major reports like this until some real evidence surfaces.
Edit: Ok I lied, I will provide two links for those of you that will complain that I didn't:
https://twitter.com/RueDaungier/status/1645045579276222465
https://www.foxnews.com/world/ukraine-claims-200-elite-russian-soldiers-killed-base-strike-luhansk
The is a duplicate post of the same WSJ article I posted earlier today.
Black Book part of the CIA has to make sure their fall guy for the pedo control ring was doing well!
I don't know what that means
Due to centripetal force (angular momentum) you weigh about .1% less at the equator than you do at the poles. Gravity is approx 1000x stronger than whatever angular momentum forces caused by the earth's rotation.
To fully counteract the force of gravity you experience while staying "stationary" (which in this case means orbiting the earth at the same speed earth spins) - you would have to orbit at roughly 22,236 miles from the surface of the earth's equator.
When Steven Greer held a press conference in May 2001 as part of his Disclosure Project, he presented testimony from members of the military and intelligence community.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8i-48LpRB9c
It didn't get too much media attention, no one really gave a shit, and memory of the event faded away pretty quickly.
The fact that DeSouza's testimony is somehow more meaningful and credible smells like BS to me.