You mean so you can slide it with gay unrelated bullshit? I can’t wait either. Im going to make it about the Revelation of the Pyramids documentary. Lmao.
^this is what zionists actually believe
Just because you’re too stupid to think of a reason for an observed pattern doesn’t mean that one doesn’t exist - that’s the….you should remember this because I just taught you about it the other day… argument from ignorance, and only disingenuous retards use it
No, actually, i told you what the direct evidence showed (which wasn’t what you initially claimed it showed), then you just reiterated that in your most recent comment here.
Do I have to go through all the other conspiracies I mentioned?
Nope, they were all uninteresting, all you have to do is watch the megalith documentary I’ve linked 5 times now. And you don’t even have to do that, it’s just what’s required for the conversation to continue
>All three of those articles literally show Brownian motion mapped from the iron core
🚨 retarded lying disingenuous kike alert 🚨
External driver hypothesis
Plate tectonic-driven A minority opinion, held by such figures as Richard A. Muller, is that geomagnetic excursions are not spontaneous processes but rather triggered by external events which directly disrupt the flow in the Earth's core. Such processes may include the arrival of continental slabs carried down into the mantle by the action of plate tectonics at subduction zones, the initiation of new mantle plumes from the core–mantle boundary, and possibly mantle-core shear forces and displacements resulting from very large impact events. Supporters of this theory hold that any of these events lead to a large scale disruption of the dynamo, effectively turning off the geomagnetic field for a period of time necessary for it to recover.[citation needed]
Substantial cosmic impact Richard A. Muller and Donald E. Morris suggest some geomagnetic reversals may be caused by very large impact events and following rapid climate change. In this theory, the impact triggers a little ice age, and water redistribution toward the poles alters the rotation rate of crust and mantle. If the sea-level change is sufficiently large (>10 meters) and rapid (within a few hundred years), the velocity shear in the liquid core disrupts the convective cells that drive the Earth's dynamo.[6]
Holy fucking retard alert
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_drift
You had to lie about the presence of mortar. You’re obviously ignorant on the subject. JWTFD.
I didn’t say pole reversals, you disingenuous yappy retard
Fuck your irrelevant link, retard, deal with the facts. (Aka blow it out your ass until you JWTFD).
>disingenuous yappy retard alert
Lmfao
No, the King's Chamber in the Great Pyramid was not constructed with mortar; the massive, precision-cut granite blocks were fitted together with extremely tight, mortar-free joints. While some mortar was used to bind the core and casing stones of the pyramid, the interior chambers like the King's Chamber and Queen's Chamber were built with an exceptionally high degree of precision using heavy, solid blocks of granite.
But you believe everything that happened in what science calls “65,000,000 years” actually did happen in the last 6,500 - disingenuous retard alert
So it sounds like if such an event could cataclyze the earth (mechanism unproven and Nibiru-like), it would not be cyclical at all
Are you seriously retarded? If a planet 700 times larger than earth orbits the Sun with a 26,000 year period and a highly elliptical orbit, it would obviously be picking up small bodies as it transited the Oort Cloud and the asteroid belt, which would lead to cyclical impacts as they were dragged closer to earth, following the pattern of the 26,000 orbit.
Since I knew you were gunna respond like a fag, make sure to check out the preemptive edit, regarding pole shifts.
What I have doubt about is any mechanism that would create cataclysms at consistent intervals in that period.
Seriously? Here’s an easy one that takes two seconds to come up with: our vertical movement wrt the galactic plane. As seen in this image:
https://i.sstatic.net/DfAo0.jpg
Or how about another easy one? The all but confirmed-to-exist now Planet 9/X
Or how about various solar cycles concatenating?
Or the most likely candidate, nothing about our cosmic environment actually changes, but cyclical shifts in the earth’s magnetic poles simply lower our cosmic defenses.
Do you want more … of that?
No, no one wants to read any further of your intellectual jerking off. How about you just engage with what’s presented while trying to minimize your tendency to argue disingenuously and against evidence not presented.
claim that Aquarius regularly influences global cataclysms
Utter fucking nonsense. The OP outlines the evidence that catastrophes on earth follow a cyclical pattern. The way you try to twist things is just because of the specific stick up your ass of biblical literalism and trying to stuff everything into 6,000 years. Try not to let your mental illness shit up my threads. It’s rude.
I was trying to find out what the evidence was for the razor claim
ITS 👏 IN 👏 THE 👏 FUCKING 👏 DOCUMENTARY 👏
Uh, Brownian motion.
What a fucking disingenuous lie
45 paragraphs on shit no one cares about
Classic.
Just such an illogical worldview, literally on par with “demons buried dinosaur bones as a test of our faith!”
This isn’t a real thread. It’s just people who follow SR around and interact with everything he posts.
The only people who’ve voted in it so far are you, TINAE, then swamp who doesn’t actually ever post here just had 3 people follow him to the thread (aka not community members) and Dresdenfirebomber an obvious shill who also isn’t a community member.
Golly, c/GovernmentApprovedConspiracies, sounds so fun and interesting.
I guess we can add psychic powers, remote viewing, people on mars and all the other shit the government admits they’ve funded as “proven direct evidence conspiracy theories”
Or maybe the entire distinction is retarded and a red herring
I ain’t muddying shit nigga, show me direct evidence of any of the things you claimed there is direct evidence for. You won’t be able to. Because it’s all based on indirect evidence and inference.
Just watch the fucking documentary or miss me with this shit.
Here’s the full talk:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QxxJkkUiRxw&pp=ygUZUmFuZGFsbCBjYXJsc29uIGZ1bGwgdGFsaw%3D%3D
Glad that 20 minute teaser has gotten you so into the subject
Statistically insignificant special pleading.
Lol, let us know when you have a model with a better fit for the data.
There was no “direct” (using your definition) evidence of covid 19 originating in that lab, nor that Fauci had funded research that produced covid 19, simply indirect evidence in the form of documents showing that the NIH, under Fauci, funded a group with different people overseeing it, and that group went on to fund “gain of function research on bat origin corona viruses” (something to that effect, and probably not even stated so directly) around 2014. Also I’ve never seen “direct” evidence that any of that other stuff you mention was done maliciously either. It obviously was, but -
It’s all indirect and inferences. And as much as I believe that all (what you laid out) to be the case, I don’t pretend like there is “direct evidence” of it. But it’s still obviously the case. Similar to the subject of the thread.
Your other examples are…lol… let’s stick to the last hundred years shall we? Julius Caesar lol
Regardless, like I said, watch that doc and if your opinion hasn’t changed after that, then this might get interesting.
[Notice to professional debooonkers/local schitzos] watch the documentary before responding