aspects of the secret are allowed to be used in any direction
Aspect (life) within direction (inception towards death)...not a secret shared; but each ones self discernment.
it's essential that he be Personal
Person aka per sonos (by sound) implies each essence by all sound.
our personhood must take its name from somewhere.
Taking any name puts the hood over being by (per) sound (son). Names in any language imply the articulation of natural sound, hence the split-tongue. That's what "taking the lords name in vain" implies.
natural consequences
Nature moves linear (inception towards death) while inspiring each ones resistance (life)...others suggest con (together) sequence (to follow) as the inversion thereof.
Action > consequence implies fiction; action > reaction implies reality. Nature acts; each being within reacts to either nature (reality) or to one another (fiction).
withheld until "iniquity is full"
In (within) quity (equal) implies choice of being within balance of nature. Nature also doesn't withhold but moves all through each one within.
Others suggest a fictitious conflict (full vs empty) to tempt one to hold onto a side, thereby withholding sight from nature.
sends out a wave
Inception>life>death implies particle within wave aka recipient send.
Alchemy was never about finding a physical philosopher's stone to create gold: alchemy was always about creating gold by transferring it to yourself out of the pockets of idiots who will listen to your chemistry rants.
The consent of those idiots to suggested chemistry rants implies the golden malleability of each beings free will of choice when ignoring natural solvent.
a real way to transmute
Trans (life) mute (inception towards death) aka ones response (re) to al (all).
original law of attraction
Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies a separation from one another aka analysis...each being within natural law is tempted by one another to ignore separation for unification aka synthesis.
Others suggest a fictitious conflict (attract vs repel) to invert analysis with synthesis.
monad
Aka monos (alone) aka all(in)one.
come from the "Anunnaki"
AN (the god of the heavens) UNNA (to grant; allow) KI (the god of the earth) aka flow (inception towards death) granting form (life).
in exchange for human sacrifice.
Form within flow implies an exchange aka an expression within change aka an offering (sacrifice).
technology
Aka techno (artifice) logy (circular thinking)...since an expression within change implies linear progression.
I would never consider owning property where a homeowners association is involved.
Paying taxes implies ones association with a government owning ones artificial property. Why artificial? Because property/properte - "nature"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/property cannot be owned by any being within.
HOA aka Home Owners Association
a) Home + ation imply being within nature aka living within the process of dying.
b) Owning implies being taking possession while ignoring given process.
c) Being within nature implies dissociation from one another...others invert this by tempting one to consent (buy) to a suggestion (sell) aka a fictitious ownership transfer.
sex symbol
a) Sex/seco - "to divide"...masturbation implies friction by rubbing together what nature divides.
b) Symbol aka syn (together) ballein (to throw)...nature divides each being apart from one another, others suggest symbolism to artificially throw together.
c) Seeing a symbol implies ones consent to suggested symbolism aka ones free will of choice throwing together what a chosen one shaped.
Resisting the temptation of symbolism requires one to discern how all divides into each one before another one can throw it back together.
Example...drawing a circle tempts those who see it to believe it to be round, while ignoring that only within an ongoing line (inception towards death) can one (life) temporary shape.
Shaping implies form...being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...holding onto any shape tempts form to ignore flow. That's how symbolism works.
dead or not
Being implies living within the process of dying...not aka nothing/nihilo implies the de-nial of all dying by one living within it.
Ones concern about another being alive or dead corrupts ones dis-cern-ment.
the fact
Fact implies fiction (information) shaped within action (inspiration).
Action moves...fiction shaped within action tempts one to hold onto it, while ignoring motion. It's ones consent to hold onto suggested facts, which permits others to shape (idolatry; reshape (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) fiction within action aka fiat currency.
G ring
G implies nature generating being...ring implies being ignoring linear progression of nature for circular thinking (logic) about artifice.
emperor
Em (within) peror (order) aka each being (life) within natural order (inception towards death).
monarchs
A contradiction in terms aka mon (singular) archs (plural) to invert the minds of gentiles. In reality...mon-arch implies singular beginning aka monos-arkhein aka first cause for each effect within.
crowned by the Church
Church implies body of christ (anointed one) aka each anointed beings body/leib/life. Hence using free will of choice to consent to a suggestion "crowning" another by the "church" of oneself.
At the very top you have jewish rabbis
Rabbi aka rabh (master) i (my) implies ones servitude to another... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rabbi
That's the inversion...rabbi implies the bottom for one who put another atop.
above Mossad
Mossad implies "institute" aka standing (stitute) within (in) aka as above/so below.
where does this all lead
All leads each ones life from inception towards death...others mislead one with for example conservatism.
they created Israel
Israel/yisra'el (he that striveth with God) implies each being within all of nature.
From the Memoirs of Hadrian: "Israel claims to distinguish itself from the rest of human kind" + "No people but Israel has the arrogance to confine truth wholly within the narrow limits of a single conception of the divine, thereby insulting the manifold nature of the Deity, who contains all"
They don't care about "the jewish people" and never have.
Because israel implies singularity, not plurality. The jewish people (plural) implies suggested pluralism tempting each (singular) consenting gentile to ignore self for others.
Rothschild implies each bearer of the red shield aka divine blood.
elitists
Elite implies "selection/choice" aka ones free will of choice selecting a chosen ones suggestion over all perceivable.
They marry into royalty
a) Roy-al implies law of all aka natural law, hence each one within being (life) of royal descend (inception towards death).
b) Marry implies wedlock aka locking ones pledge of alliance to another...an inversion of nature giving each being free will of choice.
c) What if the royal marriages represent advertisement for gentiles to marry each other, which then establishes a conflict of reason (marry vs divorce) among them?
Meanwhile a Jacob Rothschild made underhand comments about "keeping it in the family" aka incest/incaste - "within purity"...
They want you under their one world system
There can be only one...it's gentiles who believe that reasoning about wanting vs not wanting something allows them to gain more than needed.
- For the religious believers...if God is one; then what is two?
- For the scientific believers...if Energy is one; then what is two?
Choosing either triangle or square...a) binds ones free will of choice to a chosen ones suggestion. b) establishes a conflict of reason (triangle vs square), and c) imbalances ones choice.
The C of CIA implies central aka each being at center of all. Suggested tests like the above tempt consenting beings off-center.
A jew aka a chosen one aka "ones choice" implies center of all balance...gentiles choosing sides are being tempted off-center aka from ones choice consenting to a chosen ones suggestion.
Back to triangle or square...only within a flowing line (inception towards death) can form (life) be shaped. A jew aka a shapeshifter shifts shapes to distract gentiles from thinking straight within the line of natural progression. Holding onto any shape distorts ones sight.
amazon
A jew sells...if a gentiles buys; then gentiles get burned.
apple
A jew tempts with an already bitten apple...a gentile falls for temptation when taking yet another bite out of it.
microsoft
Technology Corporation implies a jew utilizing a dead (corpus) language (oration) to tempt gentiles with artifice (techno) into circular thinking (logy).
The living language implies the language/lingua - "tongue" given...not the words shaped by the splitting of the tongue.
A jew suggests google/goggle to tempt gentiles to restrict ones sight with it. Using a search engine tempts one to ignore being en (within) gine (generation).
meta
A jew suggests meta/me - "middle" to tempt gentiles to give consent by free will of choice aka a beings choice at the middle of natural balance being tempted off-center.
comcast
A jew suggests com (together) cast (to throw) to tempt gentiles to ignore being (life) thrown (inception towards death) apart from one another.
really want
Real implies ones re (response) to al (all) aka want within need.
Nature offers everything each being within needs; beings tempt each other to want more than needed.
more compassion on the one committing sin, than the one who calls the sin out
Calling out implies setting self apart...COM-passion + COM-mittal implies COM-ing together with another. Christ (anointed one) implies separation from one another. SIN aka SYN implies synthesis...
Two House Theology
There can be only one...ones consent to suggested THEO (theism) by another one; establishes LOGY (circular logic within self turning into conflicts of reason against others).
Reason (vs) implies a house divided; implication (if/then) implies a house divined. House implies each being (temple; temporary; temperature etc.), hence "our house (life) in the middle of the street (inception towards death)... https://genius.com/Madness-our-house-lyrics
- "Our house, it has a crowd"...aka matter crowding within momentum.
- "Our mum; nothing ever slows her down and a mess is not allowed"...aka momentum destroying the crowding of matter.
- "Our house, in the middle of our street"...aka matter within momentum of motion.
- "Something tells you that you've got to move away from it"...aka suggestion telling perception to move away from perceivable.
the gentile confusion
It's right in the name GEN (generation) TILE (to cover)...how does one cover generation? By tempting the generated to FUS (fuse) CON (together) ION (action).
Action (perceivable) sets reaction (perception) apart from one another...consenting to any suggestion fuses together. The former implies analysis; the latter synthesis.
Gen-tiles represent a jewish synthesis, which in return permits each jew to use analysis exclusively, hence by a chosen ones free will of choice, which cannot freely analyze while holding onto a synthesis.
genealogical myths
Geneal implies all generating each one during linear progression. Logical implies circular thinking (logic) turning into conflict (reason) among ones within all linear progress.
In short...logic establishes myth within geneal aka myth/myst/mist (clouding ones mind with ignorance).
Will there be a clean up crew?
a) Nature cleans up any mess within...each being struggles to remain clean, while messing up.
b) Media aka mediated information tempts many to hold onto narratives shaped by few, while being distracted from the natural clean-up process.
c) Nature's cleaning process (inception towards death) sucks each mess (life) down...others suggest "cleaning up" to pile mess upon mess aka layers of information held within the minds of the unwashed masses.
Aka seeking unique ways to take the life of another, while ignoring the only way giving each one within a unique life.
Side note... Ford ran his early cars on alcohol (ethanol), then Rockefeller forces "prohibition", and Ford switches to petroleum. The International jew was published in 1920...prohibition run from 1920 till 1933.
Chains That Hold You Down
A chain cannot hold down ones free will of choice...choosing to hold onto; chains one to another willingly.
Break Them
Break implies analysis (setting apart); them implies synthesis (holding together).
invisible chains
a) Being implies in-visible aka within (perception) visible (perceivable)...whatever others are showing (suggested) distorts ones vision if looking/locking.
b) Chain/catena/kat - "to twist"...all perceivable moves "straight" through each ones perception, while anything suggested "twists" ones perception; first circular within self (logic); then turning outwards against others (reason).
c) Sleight of hand for being chained by a twist... https://genius.com/The-beatles-twist-and-shout-lyrics
"Come on and twist a little closer, now...and let me know that you're mine"
False beliefs
True or false tempts ones free will of choice into believe that side/sight can be held onto...holding onto a side distorts ones sight.
Be (being) + lief/leubh (to carry; desire)...nature sets each being free from one another, which establishes the temptation to desire and carry the burden of one another. Resisting desire and letting go of self imposed burdens requires the use of ones FREE will of choice...bound by the invisible chain of ones consent to any suggestion by another.
now I'm pissed
Aka falling for emotion, while ignoring to be choice (matter) within balance (momentum) of motion...the 33 represents that balance.
666
The six pointed star is shaped out of two equilateral TRI-angles...
The phenomenon at work...no internal moral compass
a) Phenomenon at work implies ones perception within all perceivable aka ones disposition (mor) within all (al). Others suggest moralism to tempt ones disposition to hold onto a side (good or bad), which contradicts ones DIS-position (divided position) into a conflict of reason (good vs bad).
Moral implies analysis (implication); moralism implies synthesis (reason)...if consented to.
b) COM-pass implies passing together...an inversion of being (life) passed (inception towards death) apart from one another.
Notice that the center of a suggested compass is affixed, while ones perception within all perceivable implies free will of choice.
Bonus:
people get their "morality" by those they accept as "authorities"
Aka ones consent to suggested moral-ism by another. PEOPLE (suggested pluralism) represents another such transfer of authority tempting ones free will of choice to accept submission.
seek to express
Expression implies the reaction (perception) to enacting impression (perceivable)...to seek implies taking possession by giving consent to a suggested outcome.
EX (out of) PRESS (pressing into)...a jew inverts the gentile perception of expression by suggesting the PRESS (mediated information).
Consenting to suggested press implies repression of ones expression; while permitting suppression by another.
someone that swims against the flow of those around them
a) Form (life) swimming against the forwarding flow (inception towards death)...
b) Those who ignore that "against forwarding" implies within linear progression, are tricked through circular logic (against or for) to turn into a conflict of reason (against vs for).
c) Living within the process of dying implies A GAIN FOR-warded...a jew inverts this into a "for vs against" conflict of reason among gentiles.
a higher level of consciousness
a) CON (together) contradicts SCIOU (apart).
b) Level implies balance for ones choice...not levels stacked on top of each other. Perceivable level implies foundation; suggested level implies pyramid build upon foundation.
the one infinite creator
If one could create (shape out of nothing), then that would contradict one (everything for each thing within it).
if you're mad, it's a "distortion"
Emotion during motion distorts being. Why? Motion moves through a being; emotions are held within a being, while bursting outwards.
E (out) MOTE (particle aka each beings reaction) ION (action)...only within action can there be reactions; reacting to one another's outward reactions implies emotion.
For example...Coke or Pepsi tempts emotion to ignore motion aka thirst, which moves through one and cannot be held onto.
The principles of karma
Principle aka primus (first) capare (to grasp) implies being grasping at nature, while ignoring that nature moves being. The flow of nature implies the karmic justice upon any being grasping at form.
A being in motion shapes. Trying to hold onto any shape tempts emotion.
a) https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/zero + https://www.etymonline.com/word/zero + https://www.etymonline.com/word/cipher
b) Meaning implies one taking measurement, while ignoring all given.
c) Nothing implies the inversion of everything; established by ones consent to suggested nihilism (nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of all perceivable.
Ones consent to a suggestion by another one implies 1+1 aka a binary (twofold) code for ones (1) denial (0), and code/coda/codex refers to statutory law.
That's how a jew forms statutory law out of a gentiles denial of natural law flowing.
And of course the art of computation is called arithmetic; formerly tælcræft (tale-craft)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/arithmetic which combines numerology and spell-craft.
more words to counter
There cannot be more than sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all". Counting sound starts and ends at one.
It does, doesn't it. But it isn't one. Did that solve anything?
What does mainstream education teach about a verb? That it denotes "action".
What you are describing (is vs isn't) represents reactions turning against one another, while ignoring that action moves straight into reaction aka from cause into effect aka from flow into form aka from all into one.
Action implies the ongoing solution dissolving any temporary reaction within. Nature dissolves any is vs isn't conflict within by limiting each being (life) in-between boundaries (inception towards death).
You say "it isn't one", but all implies oneness (cause) for each one (effect) within. Sound implies sanus/entire/whole/all aka oneness for each one within. It's the words used to describe this which tempts one to ignore singularity for plurality, which is why each singular word is shaped by many letters.
The word 'imply', implies that there is a deeper connection left unsaid.
If/then implies a separation during motion aka analysis...not a connection aka synthesis. Your consent to the suggested word "imply" implies a synthesis tempting you to ignore analysis.
As free will of choice one needs to analyze im-plica-tion (within fold of action) to discern self as reaction within fold of action. Fold implies "to bend"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/fold as in a straight line (inception towards death) bending (life).
As for leaving unsaid...sound doesn't say anything; it internally separates instruments from one another, thereby giving the opportunity to form speech during flowing sound.
That's the shortcoming of words.
A letter is shorter than any word, and only within sound can a word come into being.
Welcome to dualism as explanation.
TO dualism implies from one towards two. TO implies the origin of one aka from all motion into each unit of matter...only afterwards can units of matter be put together into two.
A chosen one suggests one's choice to give consent to an -ism, which when given, implies a dual-ism, since it synthesizes ONES choice and a chosen ONES suggestion.
If sound; then each instrument within...that's how singularity works. If an instrument ignores sound for another instrument's words, then a dualism was shaped within the singularity of sound.
There were no words before mouths to express
a) Why do you put NO before the "word" of God? If God implies everything; then nothing (no) implies ones denial of everything.
b) Expression implies pressing outwards (ex-press) from within action (ion), hence sound allowing each instrument within to express outwards whatever noise one chooses to shape.
c) If there; then here...both imply from the perspective of one within all.
it is said that in the beginning was The Word. Logos as the spirit...
Motion (sound) > momentum (spirit) > matter (instrument)...words are exchanged by matter to distract from the momentum of motion. Words let (hence letters) others breathe spirit into one...which isn't the animating spirit (living), but the ghostly spirit (dying).
Holding onto words tempts one to ignore that sound moves through one, hence animating (motion) the spirit (momentum) of being (matter).
all words as lesser formulai....sephira...are formulated.
a) Sephira/sepiroth/sefirot aka the ein-sof (endless one) of jewish mysticism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sefirot
The trick...suggesting the sof/soph (knowledge aka all perceivable) tempts ones perception to ignore all perceivable for the suggested. A jew formulates "knowledge" within a gentiles mind, while calling it "understanding", hence tricking one to give consent to a suggestion.
The formula used implies spell-craft (words shaped within sound) and mercantile magic aka selling (to suggest) and buying (to consent). Nature sets each being free (choice)...buying and selling tempts ones free will of chocie to sell itself out by buying into a chosen ones offer.
breaks its truth
And yet truth is being held onto while fighting lies. A synthesis conflicting with analysis, hence a "world of lies".
how to count and spell
a) If God implies one, then two implies...more than God; double God? What about zero aka less or no God? How can one count without denying that there can be only one?
b) Consenting to a spell...spellbinds ones free will of choice.
eliminate the guesswork and error.
Where's the guesswork and error for form (life) within flow (inception towards death)? What if flow amends any error form shapes? What if work continues (flow) to discontinue each employee (form)?
What if that which sets simultaneously eliminates aka what if the setting (inception) of being (life) implies elimination (death)?
The word "verb" implies "word"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/verb
a) Language/lingua/dnghu - "tongue"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/language
Using any spoken language implies glossolalia... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaking_in_tongues
Nature implies sound flowing through each being...forming speech implies the articulation of natural sound. A jew knows that sound implies a process, and that gentiles can be tricked to ignore it by taking spoken words into possession.
As in...perceivable inspiration flows through ones perception, while suggested information formed tempts one to hold onto it.
b) English aka angle - "space or difference in direction between intersecting lines"...
If being (life) implies within a line (inception towards death), then sharing languages with one another implies an intersection between aka a placeholder aka system aka consensus aka egregore aka collective consciousness aka hivemind aka gestalt intelligence aka group think aka universal mind aka golem/goyim etc.
Example...if one sees a tree, then one doesn't see the word "tree". Nature doesn't label; beings use artificial labels to distract each other from nature. Suggestion represents the "ANGLE" of attack to intersect the perception of another.
c) Witch aka WHICH one...perception or suggestion? Adapting to the former makes one a sorcerer, while the latter permits another to craft which/witch-ever comes to mind.
Magic/magh - "to be able; have power"...nature (all perceivable) enables being (ones perception), yet being can disable self by sharing power (consent) with another being (suggested).
Inverting ONES CHOICE by consenting to a CHOSEN ONES suggestion...that's magic. Anything else represents suggested spectacle to distract one from discerning self as to be able to have power aka wielding free will of choice implies casting magic.