Wrong.
In that picture this represents choosing a side in-between right or wrong, hence into the mutual conflict; into the broad deception, and away from the narrow path.
failed beliefs
The narrow path implies rising (life) and falling (inception towards death) simultaneously, while beliefs tempt one to hold onto broad narratives suggested by others, which makes rising harder, while one falls tumbling.
You can't spell Choice...
A spell is shaped by letters aka ones free will of choice LETTING another shape.
“Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.” ~ Matthew 7:13-14
The black line in this picture represents the narrow path each life enters at inception and leaves at death...both sides represent broadcasted fiction to distract one from discerning self within reality.
Both sides are interchangeable aka a mirror inverting ones sight if a side is chosen. Any idol shown in this picture tempts attachment aka ones mind choosing to hold onto...doing that confines ones mind (logic) and body (reason) to mutual conflict in-between both sides.
The two circles represent logic (circular thinking) and reason (turning against one another), which distract one from the line aka "thinking straight"...
A negotiation about how to temporarily interrupt the jewish genocide of slavs to use slavs as slaves to build yet another jewish stronghold within slavic territory from which to continue the ongoing jewish genocide of slavs.
They make more of themselves
Fractal aka fract (to fracture) al (all)...only within all can there be more or less of each one. Furthermore...the fracture of all implies the fracture of singularity into each fractal unit.
Within all of energy...each power implies an energized fractal.
Fractals do not contradict themselves
guywholikesDjito2024 as one singular being using pluralism (fractals; themselves) establishes the contradiction between what all does, and what one describes to another it does not.
Does vs doesn't mutually contradict one another...no matter which side one chooses to hold onto.
You contradict reality
Re (to response) al (all)...no contradiction in that. It's branding one as "you" which establishes the contradiction aka YOU vs ME, which isn't a response to all (real) but a fictitious conflict among one another.
But not for long
a) Not contradicts for...everything forwards each thing; nothing denies that.
b) Length implies a measurement taken, while ignoring all given by ongoing motion. How could life take a measurement if it cannot take its own inception or death as extremes to measure within?
You will lose
You vs me implies a circular conflict...loss (inception towards death) generating the growth of will (life) implies linear procession.
Ev (living being) angel (divine messenger) ion (action)...action generating reaction implies the divination of each living being.
The trick...message (a communication transmitted via a messenger) instead of mittere (to send). Mittere implies action (all perceivable) sending reaction (each ones perception)...message aka messianic age implies reaction transmitting communication (suggested) to one another.
From a different perspective...viewing evangelism as gospel (god spell) tempts one to ignore that God doesn't spell by putting letters together; but moves letters apart from one another, hence "LETTING BE".
Suggestion tempts ones consent aka ones choice LETTING a chosen one shape LETTERS into words...transmitted as gospel.
Gospel ain't God spelling...
gives life from death
All gives (inception) and takes (death) from each one (life) within. The process of being moved from inception towards death implies where life comes from.
even unto resurrection
a) Dying implies the ongoing flow (even); living implies the temporary form within (odd).
b) Re (to respond) sur (to surge; rise) rect (reg; move in a straight line) ion (action)...action moving in a straight line implies dying; the surge of rising reactions within implies living.
The suggested logos "resurrection" represents a synthesis of the above analyzed inherent fraction.
redeemed what was stolen
If nature gives (inception) and takes (death); then being (life) can either utilize given by resisting the temptation of being taken OR give (to sell) and take (to buy) from one another, hence becoming a trader/traitor.
If one consents to any suggestion, then one artificially redeems (to buy) and steals (to sell) what nature gives freely.
The Lord invites to be reunited
- Lord implies "to domineer"
- Invite/invitare implies "to live within"
- To be implies "towards being".
- Re-unit implies "ones response".
All dominates by moving towards each ones free will of choice, which responses by living within all.
None of that sentence has anything to do with one another, but solely with ones (christ) response to all (god)...others tempt one to ignore self discernment by shaping sentences like that.
If one consents to the suggested sentence "the Lord invites to be reunited", then one permits another to lord over one; to give entrance (consent) to invite (suggestion); to be or not to be; and to seek reunification by joining one another.
Jesus = Yahweh
Yahweh/hawah - "was"...procession was (yahweh) before potential (christ) can take possession (jesus) over self (iam).
Yahweh (process) differentiates Christ (potential), while equalizing Jesus (possession). In other words...an anointed one cannot claim self as I AM (jesus) without establishing a conflict with YOU ARE (judah). Conflict implies friction; friction rubs off anointment...to rub off anointment implies being anti-christ.
salvation
Salva/sol (whole) + tion (action)...the whole of action implies the salvation for each resurrected ones reaction within.
"I Am that I Am" -Yahweh
a) That ain't Yahweh articulating words, but a chosen one articulating words (logos) within Yahweh to trick ones choice into claiming possession over "I am that I am". Yahweh implies the process of sound allowing each potential instrument within to shape words, while tempting one another to take possession thereof, yet one cannot take from one another without ignoring all given to each one for free will of choice.
b) "That" implies a pronoun aka a name (noun) put forwards (pro)...taking a pronoun puts a brand (jesus) onto a being (christ).
Too many words.
So too much logos (God)?
I didn’t feel it man
Why is that one can feel relief writing, while another feels the burden of reading "too much logos"?
I did like the concept.
It's concepts which tempt one to liken fractals to one another.
No it doesn't.
No vs yes aka does vs doesn't...a circle based on a con (together) cept (to grasp).
Good to see you friend.
Carry on my sovereign son...
want kids
Off-spring isn't a want vs not want conflict, but implies the opportunity to perpetuate self through another aka the need to resist wanted conflict.
One needs to grow...wanting or not wanting the fruits of growth implies putting the cover of ignorance over ones growth, while blaming others for it.
applying saliva to wounds
It's wounding while applying saliva...
antiseptic
What if wounding (anti) a child implies a rotten (sepsis) being?
The concept of fractals...
...contradicts itself. Con (together) cept (to grasp)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/concept
Whole separates fractals from one another; others suggest concepts to summon fractals together.
similarity across different
An inversion of difference (life) across same (inception towards death). Why the inversion? Because artifice (AI) inverts natural...if consented to.
If one asks AI to invert its answer, then a jew is gonna shut down ones access to AI really quick to prevent others from discerning that artificial inverts natural.
Forming any question, while seeking for an answer tempts one to ignore that solution (perceivable inspiration) moves through any question and answer (suggested information).
Grok can't adapt to perceivable inspiration...no AI ever could; only ones free will of choice can.
Btw: https://www.etymonline.com/word/grok
God's presence
Pre (before aka forwarding being) sence (essence; to be)...pre implies God; sence implies Christ send by God.
Presence implies a synthesis of logos...pre-sence implies ones free will of choice growing self discernment by analysis aka by naturally taking apart what others artificially put together.
Ultimately
Ultimate aka "forming the final aim or object" implies the end (fin) of all (al), that's the inversion of God as the ever giving beginning for each one within.
Who suggests ultimism? A jew named Schellenberg who "developed the argument from divine hiddenness (or hiddenness argument) against the existence of a God"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._L._Schellenberg
Hard to push -isms onto gentiles without continuously reshaping the logos aka crafting spells to easily tempt gentiles into pushing one another over the edge of knowledge.
Life and friction are one
a) Can you feel my fist in your face? No? That's because I have the free will of choice to resist the temptation of friction. One implies apart from one another...only within all (motion) can each one (matter) be apart from one another.
b) Try to apply "and" to God...singularity and what else? Energy and what else? Motion and what else? All and what else?
c) Notice what each mother experiences while giving birth to an off-spring...friction > relief by anointment. That's how life perpetuates by friction (inter-course) and relief (off-spring).
Sex by friction implies lust; sex for relief implies sex/seco - "to divide"...one needs to let go of what one wants to hold onto. There's free will of choice at work in-between need/want (balance).
Life in its simplest is movement.
Movement implies "moving mind"...the process of dying implies motion; the living mind/body within implies matter.
Motion (singularity) generates matter (each single unit)...matter naturally separated from one another has the free will of choice to artificially join one another. That's how simple becomes complex, which makes it more and more complex to simply let go of what one willingly holds onto like words; definitions; meanings; idols/ideals; beliefs; names/numbers etc.
The logos is alive
Logos tempts the incorporation of life aka in-corpus-oration aka tempting the living body into a mental debt by holding onto the oration by another.
Oration implies the articulation (words) of nature (sound) aka spell-craft. God implies sound/sanus (entire; whole; all) generating each instrument (mind structured within).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://genius.com/Simon-and-garfunkel-the-sound-of-silence-lyrics
The circle is ideally perfect
a) Logos allows others to shape physical (ldols) to tempt one to hold onto mental (ideal)...it's ones consent to idolatry and idealism which shapes a circle inside (logic) and outside (reason) oneself.
Nature shapes each being (life) within a line (inception towards death)...which one cannot hold onto, since all moves through one.
b) Only within a line can a circle be shaped by combining beginning and end aka ouroboros eating its own tail, which is what reason does to anyone willingly holding onto one side, which causes friction against the other.
Example...holding onto truth sustains the friction against lie. Letting go of truth prevents lie from having a foundation to attach to.
c) Why did Dante use the description "nine circles of hell"? Notice furthermore that in the Divine Comedy...the soul follows death on a linear path through the nine circles of hell.
The domain is infinite.
Only during ongoing dominance (inception towards death) can one be temporary free (life) aka free (choice) dom (balance).
fractal circular reasoning
Circular reasoning implies fractal vs fractal. Only linear procession allows fractal potential to be free from one another. VS aka versus/verto - "to turn" implies ones free will of choice choosing to turn from linear into circular by turning against one another.
individual soul
Soul/sole implies "one and only"; individual implies "divided within two)...individual contradicts soul.
If God implies one, then what is two...double God? Notice that suggested individualism is described as an ideology... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individualism aka an idea mentally circulated.
Describe fractal in theology concerning the logos
Theo (god) logy (logic)...that's not a fractal, but a synthesis of fractals, just like de (to divide) scribe (to write) and con (together) cern (to perceive).
Few suggest logos (words) to synthesize logic (circular thinking) internally; which turns into reason (mutual conflict) outwardly among many.
Analysis (natural) dissolves synthesis (artificial).
it’s one of the most elegant ways
a) "One of the most" implies a synthesis of fractals, which inverts being a fractal (fractured within all).
b) "Ways" implies a plural, which inverts the one and only way of singularity from all through each one.
c) Elegant/eligere - "select with care" implies all carrying (inception towards death) each elect (life) aka all giving each one free will of choice.
Few suggest logos to tempt many into a conflict of reason (elegantly vs austerely).
The Logos is the divine pattern
a) Sound WAS before anyone within can shape logos (words) to suggest one another what IS.
b) Pattern aka "a part showing the figure or quality of the whole" implies each divided/divine being (perception) within all (perceivable)...not what is shown to one another (suggestion).
at every level of reality
Level implies balance; being implies choice, hence ones choice responding (re) to all (al) balance.
There can be only one level (inception/death) for each one (life) within aka one balance (even) for each ones choice (odd).
logos repeats from...to...
From (inception) to (death) implies linear procession of each potential (life) within...repetition implies circular thinking aka potential holding within possession while ignoring procession.
Logos is indeed circular and fractile at the same time
God implies same; fraction implies each being (life) within the same linear procession (inception towards death) of God.
A circle can only be drawn from within a line. Logos > logic > reason implies a coming together (synthesis), not a fracturing apart from one another (analysis).
Coming together of fraction implies friction...what is used to prevent friction among fraction within motion? Lubrication aka Christ (to anoint).
natural perfection
a) Natural implies native (christ) within all (god) aka an internal separation (analysis).
b) Perfection implies by (per) combining (fect) action (ion) aka an internal unification (synthesis).
You got that right
Right vs wrong implies circular conflict against another, which distracts one from discerning self to be within right/reg - "move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=right
It is foreign to the Adamic and native in Christ.
Only within whole (god) can each native (christ) be foreign (adam) to one another, which implies an internal separation.
Adam/adamah - "ground; soil" aka natural law separating L(and) A(ir) W(ater) aka solid (matter) within spirit (momentum) of fluid (motion).
Have you reviewed the Holy Spirit?
Holy/whole implies God (motion); spirit implies the animation by God (momentum) of each anointed Christ (matter) within.
- Horizon/horizein - "bound, limit, divide, separate"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/horizon
Being given free will of choice implies at the center of horizon...others suggest extremes to tempt ones choice off-center. Ones choice consenting to suggested extremes gives authority to a chosen ones suggestion; while nullifying ones position within horizon.
In short...null implies ones denial; horizon implies all perceivable; authority implies the suggestion of another.
European; phonetic U R A PEON aka you are a type of serf held in servitude by his creditor until his debts are worked off... https://www.etymonline.com/word/peon
Viewing oneself as new or old a) puts one into a conflict of reason (new vs old) against one another, and b) gives creed to a suggestion, while putting self into debt to the one suggesting it.
to know the logos
a) Sound moving through instrument implies knowledge...logos implies artifice shaped by instrument within sound to tempt one another to hold onto words; meanings; definitions; measurements etc.
b) Logos (word) > logic (circular thinking) > reason (mutual conflict)...God implies linear procession of sound through each instrument (mind structured within).
helps to
While being (life) moved towards (inception towards death)...resistance helps; temptation hinders.
a) Prophets are for gentiles; while a jew makes profits on gentiles following pro (forwards) phecy (to speak).
b) It's gentiles who want or not want jewish prophecies, while ignoring the need to adapt to nature, which puts life on the shortlist of death.
c) As for pseudo (false)...nature cannot lie; gentiles who ignore nature for jewish lies are tricked to ignore to rise (life) during fall (inception towards death).
How does a jewish lie work? By tempting gentiles to hold onto truth, hence burdening self (living) while sinking (dying) faster.
AI being a legal 'citizen'...
...because citizenship is artificial. Natural implies native (being) within law (leg) of all (al).
tech advancement dangers
Technology implies artificial (techno) circular thinking (logy)...circular advance represents a danger to ones mind (life) during linear procession (inception towards death).
to steal, murder and destroy the real IAM
I AM (je suis; jesus) implies taking possession over one self aka trying to steal what all gives each one freely, while murdering and destroying self in the process.
will be given
That's an inversion of all giving each being free will of choice. Giving (god) comes before being (christ).
overcome all
Only within all can one come into being, while the separation of all implies a balance (over/under) for each one in-between.
most High God
a) God implies all; each one within implies in-between most/less aka low/high, hence requiring free will of choice to balance in-between.
b) Most high or least low cannot be applied to God without contradicting all God given through (life) withdrawal (inception towards death).
AI will take over language; law and power
a) Using artifice tempts will to willingly submit to artificial language; law and power.
b) Nature gives free will of choice...artifice has to be taken willingly.
AI AM
Nature implies process (inception towards death) giving potential (life)...taking potential into possession (i am) implies artificial (ai) because it ignores the natural process.
AI thinks...
...because thought can be artificially shaped with words. Information implies thinking on artificial terms; while inspiration implies nature animating thought.
therefore
There implies position (life); fore implies forwarded (inception towards death).
defending white
How does writing "a people can never be pure (white)" defends white?
nazism or nationalism
a) Singular consent (-ist) tempted into plural consensus (-ism)...it's a racket.
b) Nazi implies native; national implies native of all aka the status quo of being...suggested naz-ism and national-ism tempts one to ignore that by joining into a consensus with other ones.
incoherent
Coherence implies "connection; dependence; consistency" aka sticking together with one another...ones free will of choice needs to resist that.
makes sense
The origin of sense implies being (perception) send (perceivable)...one cannot make anything without ignoring being send within everything already available.
Making implies shaping within; magic implies making others believe in shapes...free-will-of-choice analyzes how make-belief corrupts sense by synthesis.
Says a lot
Free-will-of-choice separates speech others cast into lots aka spell-craft.
pathological need
Path implies need (linear procession); logic implies want vs not want (circular conflict).
white people
White implies pure light...people implies a summation of impurity. A people can never be pure, since light separates each person from one another. Mixing a people together for purification (equality through diversity) only increases darkness.
Much of my family is white.
In this world...few corrupt much aka "one bad apple can spoil the barrel". Why? Because light reveals; while darkness conceals.
this is not "anti...it's pro...
One cannot choose a side without turning against the other. Why? Because choice can only operate within balance.
argument
Hence...pro versus anti.
People overlook...
...because darkness conceals sight within light.
White people freak out at a 5-10% Muslim population
Submission (islam) contradicts purification (white)...light breaches darkness, while tempted to submit to being over-shadowed.
One submission has enough power to corrupt any amount of purity. Example...the Caddyshack joke about corrupting the whole pool with one bar of chocolate. That's a jewish movie joking about shitting in the gene-pool of gentiles.
Trump. Who does he really work for?
Work implies "to be in action or motion", hence its action which moves a being forward...Trump/triumph - "to prevail" implies having power by being moved forwards.
A jew plays the trump card to disempower gentiles by tricking them to submit to a deck stacked against them. What each gentile ignores...playing a game stacks the power of gentiles against one another.
the Beast can and will turn on the Harlot
Beast implies "being astute" aka discerning; while harlot implies "of no fixed occupation". Fixing onto any suggestion turns one away from discernment by perception...which only free will of choice can turn away from by thinking straight.
connecting to soul
a) Soul/sole implies one and only...connecting anything to it contradicts that.
b) Being given free will of choice implies the power of selection (analysis), which connection (synthesis) inverts.
c) Saul Alinsky in 'Rules for Radicals' wrote about how Moses was the original organizer who connected what God separated, which is what each jew does aka con (together) nectere (to bind; tie) gentiles.
Because once the connection is made, that 1 person becomes...
...a contradiction of oneself by connecting to another one. One implies divided from; not connected with.
person becomes an unstoppable force
Per (by) son (sound)...sound implies the unstoppable force, which starts (inception) and ends (death) each byproduct (life) within.
the mind aligns with greater Life (God)
a) Alignment implies thinking straight instead of circular logic.
b) God implies process of dying within which each life comes into being in-between greater/lesser.
good inevitably wins
Win/wen - "desire; strive for"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/win
Being implies growth (life) within loss (inception towards death) hence needing to resist the wanted desire to strive forwards. A jew suggests gambling (win vs lose) and moralism (good vs bad) to tempt gentiles to ignore that.
being reborn
Born implies carried (life) forth (inception towards death)...reborn implies ones response while being carried forth.
when humans connect
The hu (hue; color) of man implies the separation of light into a visible spectrum...any connection within the visible spectrum of light casts darkness upon one another.
a) There can be only "now"...before and after represent mental measurements; not physical states of perception.
b) Life being moved from inception towards death implies being within a "deadline".
c) If one chooses to ignore all perceivable for any suggestion by another, then one enters a "dark age"...letting go of suggested implies enlightenment aka ones exit out of darkness.
d) Bill implies a seal; gate implies a passage (life) in-between entering (inception) and exiting (death)...ignorance seals ones discernment thereof.
Can the chute not stay open when approaching fifty?
Most likely not a speed issue, but flying too low over artificial structures who manipulate the natural wind above. The flimsy chute offers little resistance to quick changes of wind direction, and the weight attached to the chute just waits for the opportunity to fall down.
I've always been interested in doing this
Just don't underestimate the ground and fly a little higher to be able to react (counter navigation; entanglement; spare chute etc).
On the other hand...if you're interested in doing it like him, then consider adding a woo-hoo to your Macho Man elbow-drop impression.
Do any of those narratives benefit gentiles?