Logos is indeed circular and fractile at the same time
God implies same; fraction implies each being (life) within the same linear procession (inception towards death) of God.
A circle can only be drawn from within a line. Logos > logic > reason implies a coming together (synthesis), not a fracturing apart from one another (analysis).
Coming together of fraction implies friction...what is used to prevent friction among fraction within motion? Lubrication aka Christ (to anoint).
natural perfection
a) Natural implies native (christ) within all (god) aka an internal separation (analysis).
b) Perfection implies by (per) combining (fect) action (ion) aka an internal unification (synthesis).
You got that right
Right vs wrong implies circular conflict against another, which distracts one from discerning self to be within right/reg - "move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=right
It is foreign to the Adamic and native in Christ.
Only within whole (god) can each native (christ) be foreign (adam) to one another, which implies an internal separation.
Adam/adamah - "ground; soil" aka natural law separating L(and) A(ir) W(ater) aka solid (matter) within spirit (momentum) of fluid (motion).
Have you reviewed the Holy Spirit?
Holy/whole implies God (motion); spirit implies the animation by God (momentum) of each anointed Christ (matter) within.
SovereignSon: define fractal in theology relating to the logos
Grok: The concept of fractals, which are intricate geometric patterns that exhibit self-similarity across different scales—meaning the whole resembles its parts, infinitely repeating in complexity—has been metaphorically applied to theology, particularly in relation to the Logos.
youtube.com
In Christian theology, the Logos (from the Greek for "word," "reason," or "principle") refers to the divine Word as described in the Gospel of John, embodying God's rational order, creative power, and incarnation in Christ.
1517.org
This connection draws on how fractals symbolize infinite recursion and unity within diversity, mirroring theological ideas of God's immanent presence throughout creation.At its core, fractal theology posits that reality reflects a self-similar divine pattern, where the infinite (God) manifests in the finite (creation) without losing its essence.
fractal-consciousness-site.lovable.app
For instance, the Logos is seen as the "informational structure" of God that incarnates within the world, creating an ontological recursion: the universal divine pattern embeds itself in particular instances, revealing a self-similar structure of being, much like how a fractal's design repeats at every zoom level.
fractal-consciousness-site.lovable.app
This isn't mere metaphor; proponents argue it aligns with biblical narratives, such as Genesis 1, where the "beginning" (arche or principio) is interpreted as the Logos—the paternal intellect containing all subsequent forms, unfolding fractally into heaven and earth.
symmetria.substack.com
In Gnostic-influenced interpretations, the Logos crowns a hierarchy of divine emanations (Aeons) and contains fractals of them all, dreaming of paradise before a "Fall" that introduces differentiation—yet the underlying self-similar unity persists.
gnosticinsights.com
Similarly, complexity theory supports this by viewing time and creation through fractal lenses, providing a rational foundation for biblical theology where God's kingdom advances via patterns that replicate eternally, like life begetting life in its image.
rtulip.net +1
Examples from scripture include the exponential growth of faith (e.g., mustard seed parables) or the infinite layers of divine revelation, echoing fractal geometry's role in describing eternity.Broader philosophical ties reinterpret the Stoic Logos—divine reason animating the cosmos—as a recursive "witness function" that persists through change, bridging theology and metaphysics.
medium.com
Ultimately, this fractal-Logos framework emphasizes God's communicative, ordering presence: the divine Word not only creates but permeates all scales of existence, inviting contemplation of infinity within the everyday.
Whole separates fractals from one another; others suggest concepts to summon fractals together.
similarity across different
An inversion of difference (life) across same (inception towards death). Why the inversion? Because artifice (AI) inverts natural...if consented to.
If one asks AI to invert its answer, then a jew is gonna shut down ones access to AI really quick to prevent others from discerning that artificial inverts natural.
Forming any question, while seeking for an answer tempts one to ignore that solution (perceivable inspiration) moves through any question and answer (suggested information).
Grok can't adapt to perceivable inspiration...no AI ever could; only ones free will of choice can.
Pre (before aka forwarding being) sence (essence; to be)...pre implies God; sence implies Christ send by God.
Presence implies a synthesis of logos...pre-sence implies ones free will of choice growing self discernment by analysis aka by naturally taking apart what others artificially put together.
Ultimately
Ultimate aka "forming the final aim or object" implies the end (fin) of all (al), that's the inversion of God as the ever giving beginning for each one within.
Who suggests ultimism? A jew named Schellenberg who "developed the argument from divine hiddenness (or hiddenness argument) against the existence of a God"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._L._Schellenberg
Hard to push -isms onto gentiles without continuously reshaping the logos aka crafting spells to easily tempt gentiles into pushing one another over the edge of knowledge.
Life and friction are one. Life in its simplest is movement. The logos is alive. The circle is idealy perfect. The fractal is perfect. The domain is infinite. The infant fractal circular reasoning is the logos in each individual Christian soul.
a) Can you feel my fist in your face? No? That's because I have the free will of choice to resist the temptation of friction. One implies apart from one another...only within all (motion) can each one (matter) be apart from one another.
b) Try to apply "and" to God...singularity and what else? Energy and what else? Motion and what else? All and what else?
c) Notice what each mother experiences while giving birth to an off-spring...friction > relief by anointment. That's how life perpetuates by friction (inter-course) and relief (off-spring).
Sex by friction implies lust; sex for relief implies sex/seco - "to divide"...one needs to let go of what one wants to hold onto. There's free will of choice at work in-between need/want (balance).
Life in its simplest is movement.
Movement implies "moving mind"...the process of dying implies motion; the living mind/body within implies matter.
Motion (singularity) generates matter (each single unit)...matter naturally separated from one another has the free will of choice to artificially join one another. That's how simple becomes complex, which makes it more and more complex to simply let go of what one willingly holds onto like words; definitions; meanings; idols/ideals; beliefs; names/numbers etc.
The logos is alive
Logos tempts the incorporation of life aka in-corpus-oration aka tempting the living body into a mental debt by holding onto the oration by another.
Oration implies the articulation (words) of nature (sound) aka spell-craft. God implies sound/sanus (entire; whole; all) generating each instrument (mind structured within).
a) Logos allows others to shape physical (ldols) to tempt one to hold onto mental (ideal)...it's ones consent to idolatry and idealism which shapes a circle inside (logic) and outside (reason) oneself.
Nature shapes each being (life) within a line (inception towards death)...which one cannot hold onto, since all moves through one.
b) Only within a line can a circle be shaped by combining beginning and end aka ouroboros eating its own tail, which is what reason does to anyone willingly holding onto one side, which causes friction against the other.
Example...holding onto truth sustains the friction against lie. Letting go of truth prevents lie from having a foundation to attach to.
c) Why did Dante use the description "nine circles of hell"? Notice furthermore that in the Divine Comedy...the soul follows death on a linear path through the nine circles of hell.
The domain is infinite.
Only during ongoing dominance (inception towards death) can one be temporary free (life) aka free (choice) dom (balance).
fractal circular reasoning
Circular reasoning implies fractal vs fractal. Only linear procession allows fractal potential to be free from one another. VS aka versus/verto - "to turn" implies ones free will of choice choosing to turn from linear into circular by turning against one another.
individual soul
Soul/sole implies "one and only"; individual implies "divided within two)...individual contradicts soul.
If God implies one, then what is two...double God? Notice that suggested individualism is described as an ideology... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individualism aka an idea mentally circulated.
God implies same; fraction implies each being (life) within the same linear procession (inception towards death) of God.
A circle can only be drawn from within a line. Logos > logic > reason implies a coming together (synthesis), not a fracturing apart from one another (analysis).
Coming together of fraction implies friction...what is used to prevent friction among fraction within motion? Lubrication aka Christ (to anoint).
a) Natural implies native (christ) within all (god) aka an internal separation (analysis).
b) Perfection implies by (per) combining (fect) action (ion) aka an internal unification (synthesis).
Right vs wrong implies circular conflict against another, which distracts one from discerning self to be within right/reg - "move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=right
Only within whole (god) can each native (christ) be foreign (adam) to one another, which implies an internal separation.
Adam/adamah - "ground; soil" aka natural law separating L(and) A(ir) W(ater) aka solid (matter) within spirit (momentum) of fluid (motion).
Holy/whole implies God (motion); spirit implies the animation by God (momentum) of each anointed Christ (matter) within.
SovereignSon: define fractal in theology relating to the logos
Grok: The concept of fractals, which are intricate geometric patterns that exhibit self-similarity across different scales—meaning the whole resembles its parts, infinitely repeating in complexity—has been metaphorically applied to theology, particularly in relation to the Logos.
youtube.com
In Christian theology, the Logos (from the Greek for "word," "reason," or "principle") refers to the divine Word as described in the Gospel of John, embodying God's rational order, creative power, and incarnation in Christ.
1517.org
This connection draws on how fractals symbolize infinite recursion and unity within diversity, mirroring theological ideas of God's immanent presence throughout creation.At its core, fractal theology posits that reality reflects a self-similar divine pattern, where the infinite (God) manifests in the finite (creation) without losing its essence.
fractal-consciousness-site.lovable.app
For instance, the Logos is seen as the "informational structure" of God that incarnates within the world, creating an ontological recursion: the universal divine pattern embeds itself in particular instances, revealing a self-similar structure of being, much like how a fractal's design repeats at every zoom level.
fractal-consciousness-site.lovable.app
This isn't mere metaphor; proponents argue it aligns with biblical narratives, such as Genesis 1, where the "beginning" (arche or principio) is interpreted as the Logos—the paternal intellect containing all subsequent forms, unfolding fractally into heaven and earth.
symmetria.substack.com
In Gnostic-influenced interpretations, the Logos crowns a hierarchy of divine emanations (Aeons) and contains fractals of them all, dreaming of paradise before a "Fall" that introduces differentiation—yet the underlying self-similar unity persists.
gnosticinsights.com
Similarly, complexity theory supports this by viewing time and creation through fractal lenses, providing a rational foundation for biblical theology where God's kingdom advances via patterns that replicate eternally, like life begetting life in its image.
rtulip.net +1
Examples from scripture include the exponential growth of faith (e.g., mustard seed parables) or the infinite layers of divine revelation, echoing fractal geometry's role in describing eternity.Broader philosophical ties reinterpret the Stoic Logos—divine reason animating the cosmos—as a recursive "witness function" that persists through change, bridging theology and metaphysics.
medium.com
Ultimately, this fractal-Logos framework emphasizes God's communicative, ordering presence: the divine Word not only creates but permeates all scales of existence, inviting contemplation of infinity within the everyday.
...contradicts itself. Con (together) cept (to grasp)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/concept
Whole separates fractals from one another; others suggest concepts to summon fractals together.
An inversion of difference (life) across same (inception towards death). Why the inversion? Because artifice (AI) inverts natural...if consented to.
If one asks AI to invert its answer, then a jew is gonna shut down ones access to AI really quick to prevent others from discerning that artificial inverts natural.
Forming any question, while seeking for an answer tempts one to ignore that solution (perceivable inspiration) moves through any question and answer (suggested information).
Grok can't adapt to perceivable inspiration...no AI ever could; only ones free will of choice can.
Btw: https://www.etymonline.com/word/grok
Pre (before aka forwarding being) sence (essence; to be)...pre implies God; sence implies Christ send by God.
Presence implies a synthesis of logos...pre-sence implies ones free will of choice growing self discernment by analysis aka by naturally taking apart what others artificially put together.
Ultimate aka "forming the final aim or object" implies the end (fin) of all (al), that's the inversion of God as the ever giving beginning for each one within.
Who suggests ultimism? A jew named Schellenberg who "developed the argument from divine hiddenness (or hiddenness argument) against the existence of a God"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._L._Schellenberg
Hard to push -isms onto gentiles without continuously reshaping the logos aka crafting spells to easily tempt gentiles into pushing one another over the edge of knowledge.
No it doesn't.
Good to see you friend.
#LiveTheRevelation
Life and friction are one. Life in its simplest is movement. The logos is alive. The circle is idealy perfect. The fractal is perfect. The domain is infinite. The infant fractal circular reasoning is the logos in each individual Christian soul.
a) Can you feel my fist in your face? No? That's because I have the free will of choice to resist the temptation of friction. One implies apart from one another...only within all (motion) can each one (matter) be apart from one another.
b) Try to apply "and" to God...singularity and what else? Energy and what else? Motion and what else? All and what else?
c) Notice what each mother experiences while giving birth to an off-spring...friction > relief by anointment. That's how life perpetuates by friction (inter-course) and relief (off-spring).
Sex by friction implies lust; sex for relief implies sex/seco - "to divide"...one needs to let go of what one wants to hold onto. There's free will of choice at work in-between need/want (balance).
Movement implies "moving mind"...the process of dying implies motion; the living mind/body within implies matter.
Motion (singularity) generates matter (each single unit)...matter naturally separated from one another has the free will of choice to artificially join one another. That's how simple becomes complex, which makes it more and more complex to simply let go of what one willingly holds onto like words; definitions; meanings; idols/ideals; beliefs; names/numbers etc.
Logos tempts the incorporation of life aka in-corpus-oration aka tempting the living body into a mental debt by holding onto the oration by another.
Oration implies the articulation (words) of nature (sound) aka spell-craft. God implies sound/sanus (entire; whole; all) generating each instrument (mind structured within).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://genius.com/Simon-and-garfunkel-the-sound-of-silence-lyrics
a) Logos allows others to shape physical (ldols) to tempt one to hold onto mental (ideal)...it's ones consent to idolatry and idealism which shapes a circle inside (logic) and outside (reason) oneself.
Nature shapes each being (life) within a line (inception towards death)...which one cannot hold onto, since all moves through one.
b) Only within a line can a circle be shaped by combining beginning and end aka ouroboros eating its own tail, which is what reason does to anyone willingly holding onto one side, which causes friction against the other.
Example...holding onto truth sustains the friction against lie. Letting go of truth prevents lie from having a foundation to attach to.
c) Why did Dante use the description "nine circles of hell"? Notice furthermore that in the Divine Comedy...the soul follows death on a linear path through the nine circles of hell.
Only during ongoing dominance (inception towards death) can one be temporary free (life) aka free (choice) dom (balance).
Circular reasoning implies fractal vs fractal. Only linear procession allows fractal potential to be free from one another. VS aka versus/verto - "to turn" implies ones free will of choice choosing to turn from linear into circular by turning against one another.
Soul/sole implies "one and only"; individual implies "divided within two)...individual contradicts soul.
If God implies one, then what is two...double God? Notice that suggested individualism is described as an ideology... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individualism aka an idea mentally circulated.
I didn’t feel it man, I did like the concept.
#ReignWithFire #LiveTheRevelation