That's a good point. Usually people focus on how someone look and not much else, but those that have this ability can tell that something is amiss. You can feel that this is not the same person. Yes, appearance is an important factor, but it's not the only one.
What if all those botched "surgeries" is the moment when they are being replaced? They can't create a perfect copy. So they do the best they can and tell the masses that it's just a surgery, a depression, drug use, aging or some other such bullshit.
Check out this video. Particularly his quick interview after the awards (starting at about 00:17). This is not Carrey. Also, why would he be so nervous about saying few sentences in French? He's an actor, for fucks sakes! That's what he's been doing for all his life. Acting. His whole argument is illogical. Besides, check out at about 00:39, he's clearly saying "I'm dead!" with emphasis. Well, they always tell the masses the truth in one way or another, I guess...
"Plastic surgery" is kind of a standard excuse in cases like this one. I don't really buy it. I think it's bullshit. Especially in this case.
Carrey has made his entire carrer making expressions and impersonations. His ability to wriggle face like a rubber is one of his main assets. Plastic surgery seriously limits making any type of expressions. Everyone knows it. He'd be absolutely insane to go for it.
Also, why is it that they always look significantly worse than before? Isn't it a little bit suspicious? Apparently Hollywood is full of hack doctors who constantly botch celebrity faces and yet they still go for it and no one complains? Right?
Why is it that no one talks about it openly. It's just celebrity looking way different than before and everyone just whispers behind their backs or something... I don't know... I think at least some of them would have talked about this or that surgery. It's not like it's a taboo or something. I've seen normies freely talking and even publicly documenting their plastic surgeries without any problem. Why is it that celebrities are so shy on this subject?
All in all, I think this "plastic surgery" thing is a very convenient excuse. Especially for normies.
This is so incredibly evil. Who knew depressed people want to die, right? Fuck, this is the definition of depression: people do not see a point in life and want to die. It's a mental illness...
In any case, at this point it should be clear to everyone that depopulation agenda is true. They are killing off useless eaters (as they like to call us) and they are not going to stop at MAID alone. We are at war.
Yes. Also, giving names to generations is likely a psyop in itself. It's a classic Divide and Conquer. Alienate groups of people from each other and keep them apart. The more various division lines there are the easier masses can be controlled and manipulated.
Yeah, they need some slaves, but not all of them. Above all, they need those slaves to be obedient. So, the plan seems to be: cull most and put the rest under strict digital control. Say, reduce population by some 90% and make everyone else into a literal biorobot without any free will to speak of, thus dividing human race into two absolutely incompatible castes - almost like two separate species - small in numbers, but very powerful ruler caste and larger in numbers, but totally controlled slave caste.
I'm from EU and I definitely do not see any natalism here. If anything we are currently being ruled by a literal death cult. Currently they are doing everything they can to prevent people forming healthy families and having healthy and mentally sound kids. Almost all of the EU leaders are despicable abominations who hate their own people. They don't even try to hide it anymore. Also, it seems that Canada is on the way out as well. What with all their (heavily promoted) "voluntary" euthanasia policies and all that. I won't even mention UK, which is basically done at this point.
All in all, I'd say natalism is the last thing we should be worried about. It's the literal death cult that is ruling over us we should worry about. Sometimes they might be pretending to be for family or kids with all their digital id and similar shit, but in reality all of that works towards depopulation and polarisation of society all the same.
This thought has passed my mind as well. Not only regarding recent years, but also regarding past social upheavals as well.
For example, is there some great German literature from 1935-1945? I don't mean propaganda material (of whatever side). I mean just some good books, good novels, good writers etc. I can't find them. It's almost as if there were no new (and good) books released in Germany during the period of 1935-1945 or so.
It's not only about Nazy Germany. It's also about all other great social upheavals as well. Good art suddenly disappears. You can find only propaganda material, but just good quality art becomes almost non-existent. Which seems very strange, to be honest. No matter the ideological underpinning of some period or place there still should be some good artists and good art, right? Right?
Apparently not... It seems that art of all types degrades in all (or almost all) socially unstable environments.
That said, I'm aware that Netflix and it's likes are little more than pure propaganda. I guess my general point is that it seems that ideology and social upheavals of any type tends to degrade art.
But that's the actual goal here! To make citizenry as much dependent on the state as possible. They'd love to get masses trembling about power outages and internet disconnections as much as possible. That would mean that ordinary normies would be supportive of state control even more!
Currently you could survive without state support at least for some time. There's cash, there's gasoline cars, there's independent gardening, decentralised heating etc... It would be hard, but doable. With all digital, however, you'd be completely dependent on the state. Totally. Your survival would quite literally be dependent on state power. It's incredibly evil plan actually. The state and corporate power is the greatest evil there is. Especially when state and corporate powers merge, which they basically already have.
Yeah, I absolutely agree. All of that is happening. But the big questions is: What do we actually do about it?
Spreading info is one thing and that's good, but are there some other things that could be done to avoid total digital prison... or at the very least slow it down or dilute its effects?
I don't know...
What I do know, though, is that I'm not really ready to live in the future they are preparing for us. If they really go on with it I'll probably end up as a total loner staring at the wall all day. I'm already preparing myself to leave all social media when they make ID mandatory to log in to your account. I'm not yet sure what will I do when the next steps come... In any case, with each passing day it seems more and more like a good hill to die on.
Probably... we'll see. There's also an option to divide your life in two. If they really force you use completely cotrolled and monitored device, then it should be used only for official government business and nothing else at all. Everything else should be done on a different device and from different accounts. This is not optimal, just one of the possible options that comes to my mind.
Damn, I've read so many of his books... His earlier stuff is kinda ok. Except some weird stuff here and there, of course. Lately, however, he's gone downhill pretty heavily. Especially since the scamdemic started. Now, I'm wondering: Was he always like that? What does it say about other - let's call them - content creators? He wasn't really that political before 2000s. It was quite easy to overlook some weird bits here and there and consider him a somewhat sane human being.
Could be three. Likely not 14.
Will we be legally obliged to own a smartphone? I do own one, but if some clerk or official asks, I do not, because my main calling phone is not a smartphone. Also, I do not have any government or official apps installed even on my secondary phone.
If government makes smartphone ownership mandatory, I'd like to get it for free, please... and if anyone wants to make me buy one myself, then sorry, I'm veeery poor and simply can't afford it (wink, wink). (That said, of course I understand that they do have their ways to force people. This is just an idea of a strategy one might try to use when the time comes.)
Yeah, I've come to this conclusion as well. Many people are still clinging to the notion that tech is just a tool, that it is neutral and all that. Well, it's probably not. Some are hoping for social networks to spread the message, some others are seeking for digital salvation in open source, crypto, blockchain etc, etc. Of course, that's nice and all, but I'm not sure I believe in tech solutions anymore. Tech was never meant to liberate or help people. TPTB see tech only as a tool of control and nothing much more.
Hell, maybe that even was one of the main reasons why UK left the EU. So they could test run this digital prison in a single "independent" country before they impose it on the whole continent.
Quite possibly. I, for one, didn't know who he is until the event. Sure, I'm not hardcore conservative and I don't follow all their speakers, but still... shouldn't I at least be aware that such a person exists? If no one outside conservative bubble knew him, was he really such a significant figure?
It's possible that AI will be the true downfall of our culture and that same critical thinking this video is talking about. Right now it might not seem that way yet, but if we extrapolate a little, the overall picture is quite terrifying.
For example, I do like to read some books from time to time. Now, what is the probability that any book released after 2024 will be at least partly generated by an AI? I guess it's pretty high. So, my interest in reading anything released after 2024 is pretty low. As a conclusion any literature after 2024 basically goes out of the window. The same goes for music. Even if some piece is being performed live, what is the probability that those people actually did write it by themselves? Yep, I think it's pretty low. So, any new music automatically becomes background sound at best.
In other words: art and culture is pretty much dead. Real creativity as well. Currently it all still somehow goes on using some leftover fumes from ages past, but for how long would that be is anyone's guess. What we are left with is an AI generated slop everywhere regurgitating the same music, words, thoughts etc over and over again in different various combinations and the longer it goes on the emptier it all becomes until finally nothing will mean anything and no one will pay attention to nothing.
That's a contradiction. If you can't know anything for sure, you can't know this for sure either.
I think you're just splitting hairs now. There's no need to absolutise everything. I meant this more like a general direction. Like an overall guideline. We can't know anything. Who knows, maybe all this is simulated? Maybe I'm dreaming all this. Or maybe I'm just a hallucination of the God. However, if I see that it rains outside, for all intents and purposes, I do know that it rains outside. There are various levels of truth and reality.
The only Church that meets this criteria would be the Eastern Orthodox.
Well, I'm not in that camp although I do live in a country where Eastern Orthodoxy has significant amount of followers. That said, even Eastern Orthodox is not quite monolithic. There are Old Believers and there are general Eastern Orthodoxy, different countries practice differently, it is influenced by politics and so on, and so on.
Then you can't have any knowledge apart from empirical knowledge of things you witnessed yourself (and even then you have to trust your senses and evaluation).
That's correct! We can't know for sure anything. We can only assume. We've been indoctrinated almost 24/7 for all our lives. This we know of. But what if we have been indoctrinated not only on cognitive level, but on a deeper level as well? Who's to say what's real and what's not at this point?
Where do they get their beliefs from? Believers in what exactly?
That's a good question actually. So, your assumption is that only official Church has the monopoly on truth. Ok, which one? Catholic? What about Orthodox? Which one of those is correct?
How do you have knowledge of what true Christianity is or who the Christian God is then? It's most likely the Bible, right?
But even Bible is not something that simply appeared in its current form. It was compiled relatively recently from various texts by various authors. Different confessions have different canons. Which one is the correct one? Catholic, Protestant, maybe Ethiopian one? And what about apocrypha? Why some texts were included and some weren't? Who exactly do we trust on this?
You see, everything a human hand touches is marred by lies, omissions, half-truths and whatnot. We cannot trust anything coming from human beings. There is no sure way to determine what is true and what is not. That's just how it is in this sorry world.
Christ Himself affirms the authority of that institution (the Church being His body) and sends the Holy Spirit to His apostles...
As other commenter has already stated, I think this is probably meant as a whole body of all believers. Not some particular institution with some particular people a the helm, but the whole collective of Christian believers.
Again, you're leaning on your presupposition that Christianity is false and go for a pragmatic explanation. But I'd say "it worked" because it is good in the eyes of God and it mirrors the monarchy of the Father in the Trinity and the natural hierarchy of all things.
Not quite. At no point did I imply that belief in God or Christ is false. I do have my issues with the institute of it though. See, that's what the elites do. They take something good and then they twist and turn and manipulate it until it serves their interest. By adhering to the good in people and by manipulating it they make people submit to them, submit to their nonexistent authority, which, again, is the root cause of all this shitshow, in my opinion.
In any case I do prefer traditional values over modern ones myself and this has been a very interesting discussion at the very least.
Didn't not know about that. When was that?