It's not this one, it had commentary on it, talked about some of the more weird and less believable angles like mirroring words to create new words or 1 candle being out while the other three were lit.
I think I watched another video from the guy's channel and he talked about how he used to listen to red ice(?) radio which was deep into conspiracy stuff, and then it started talking about immigration and 'racist' stuff and he got hugely turned off to the channel, but eventually converted more to that way of thinking
first hyperlink in the text from the link of twitter.
I have no doubt this will be used for bad ends, but the principle is correct, the British do not need "european human rights" we are perfectly capable of crafting our own language of human rights that is far less abusable than the current wording from the ECHR which is stopping us enforcing our border and kicking out migrants that take dingies across from france and then get put up in 4star hotels with prepaid credit cards consistently refilled by the government.
or it's just a generic boiler plate message that they all tweet out with a few tweaks here and there.
While this is true, there are laws and new rules and cultural norms being currently fought around the identity of trannies, so the trannie problem doesn't just disappear if you stop consuming the news surrounding them, nor does it become any less of a problem to society at large.
You just speak your mind and share information (with words) while watching the news with them. Low and behold, slowly over time, 'conspiracy theories' that you've been stating that were scoffed at, slowly get admitted or alluded to by the MSM, and you get to have your little 'well, would you look at that, they're finally catching up' (instead of i told you so)
Here is one for you
If the date titles (eg October 25, 2019) already have a specific day are they assumed to be correct and don't need touching?
and is it just the "october 2019" and "january 2020" sections that need specific dates added?
Another question, october 25, 2019 "Scientists Were Hunting for the Next Ebola. Now the U.S. Has Cut Off Their Funding."
It has the same archive link twice, intentional?
What does the video prove or convey that the original photo of yours, and the three photos in my image, don't?
You wouldn't care if I showed you video of a boat with the bottom part being invisible, but once you zoom in enough, the bottom reappears, so what difference does it make?
And again, I never asked you to comment on the picture. That is just for curious and inquisitive eyes, who are looking for answers or responses to your original proposition.
Downvoting these comments is weak btw.
Or just ignore all the words and look at the 3 images that convey how your picture doesn't convey what you think it conveys.
And besides the picture, which I never asked you to comment on, I asked questions in my other comment, the image is nothing more than an aside that you can freely ignore and disparage at your leisure.
i posted another comment in this thread, reply to it dolt, please :)
Dolt, you are obviously very contrarian, question, why does attempting to btfo flat earthers interest you?
Do you think their views are harmful?
Are you unaware of how flat earthers would response and 'debunk'/dispute this picture (and the framing)?
Do you think this picture is some kind of slam dunk proof?
Is the aim just to cause pointless discussion on what you deem an irrelevant topic?
Help me out here, clue me in to your thinking, I'd appreciate it.
Here is an appropriate retort/'debunk' picture;
https://ibb.co/z47ysTj
How do you rationalise the 8inches per mile squared drop-off due to curvature, and the subsequent many tests of people sighting objects that were present (buildings) or that they placed (light sources) or in some instances lasers, over distances that should presumably be curved, according to the globe model
https://t.me/foundring
is this you on telegram?