Article here if you care for mainstream media cancer: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/idris-elba-luther-black-drama-crime-bbc-diversity-chief-8dgzjkx7v
You've been trolled by the medical community. The HIV/AIDS hypothesis is bullshit. Gallo announced HIV was the cause of AIDS before it had been scientifically verified. AIDS never spread like an infectious disease, ie it never spread from the original risk groups in the 1980s. Look at the transmission rates for HIV https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV/AIDS#Transmission These are official numbers. That is not a sexually transmitted disease, if it is, it must be the hardest disease EVER to catch. AIDS in the west was a lifestyle disease, people died because of heavy drug use essentially, and they blamed it on a virus. (Cocaine and poppers etc). It only really effected a certain subset of the gay population that practiced a certain lifestyle. In Africa what they say is AIDS is just this other disease called poverty. If people died of pneumonia, and they said they had HIV they got money, so everyone suddenly had AIDS, even though no one was ever tested. In the 1980s they killed huge numbers of people by giving them an 'anti-viral' drug called AZT. Actually the drug was a developed as a chemotherapy drug, but was deemed too toxic for use and was rejected. It acts as a DNA chain terminator drug. It destroys every part of your body, your skin, your bone marrow, your immune system. Staying on this drug will lead to certain death. The logic was to kill 1000 healthy cells to kill that one HIV, it was beyond stupidity. Today's anti-viral s aren't so toxic so people aren't dropping dead like crazy. This is why an HIV diagnosis is no longer a death sentence. The inventor of the PCR test knew that HIV was bullshit, and he called them out on it.
Have a read of https://www.amazon.co.uk/Root-Canal-Cover-Up-Association-Specialists/dp/0945196199 you can probably find a free pdf copy somewhere
Big pharma direct to consumer advertising has helped destroy the media. They won't run stories that negatively impact their sponsors, and that can lead to the general public being in the dark on some very important issues. So having a media organisation not be corrupted by this money is rare.
Good post