High resolution image of it -> https://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS12/48/7071.jpg
Pretty much. You only drink a fraction of the tap water anyway. Something like 95% just goes straight down the drain after passing through your shower or toilet etc. The fluoride they add really is unpurified toxic waste and by that I mean a good chunk isn't even fluoride. What they add is frequently contaminated with lead, arsenic and sometimes radio active isotopes. But through the magic of dilution is rendered safe. At least that is the theory.
From the article:
“Recommending a product that has serious safety signals, which is unnecessary because of widespread natural immunity and a generally mild disease, and which possibly has negative efficacy, is an egregious violation of regulatory procedures, and a profound violation of public trust,” she wrote in part.
In its statement, AAPS also pointed out that making the COVID-19 shots a routine childhood vaccination also would “ensure a steady revenue stream for manufacturers.”
This one is really good too in case you missed it: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Yw7gyWKqmrMj/
I'd sticky both :)
I often see normies comment about Jones being controlled opposition etc. But literally no one has been persecuted like Jones. Simultaneously blacklisted from youtube, twitter etc. They went after his advertisers. Now dragged through the court system for having the wrong opinion and sued for clown world amounts of money.
There you go. No need to be so rude. But the answer is it's not an easily digestible number because the data is spread across various manufactures etc.
Kinda. Studies say it works topically in toothpaste but at levels of 1000ppm or 1000 times greater than that of tap water. But you aren't supposed to swallow toothpaste because it's poisonous. Diluting it in water doesn't magically make it less poisonous.
In fact we only drink something like 1 or 2% of tap water the rest simply goes down the drain via toilet/shower etc. Fluoridation is simply a way of getting rid of toxic waste by diluting it down to 'safe' levels.
Maybe. The reflected photo doesn't make much sense either. Why is the landscape so bright on the left side? But dark on the other side. Surely if lit by the sun the landscape would be lit uniformly. The ground looks relatively flat there so I don't think the difference in brightness can be explained by the gradient of the ground.