He called into a radio show some years later seemingly unaware of this official version and recalled how the building was taken down in a controlled implosion https://youtu.be/gNIzC4a8rLs
These buildings have massive structural redundancy, they can support on average 3-5x their own weight. In a controlled demolition it's common for 20% of the core columns to be cut to weaken these structures before they are demolished. Nist tried to claim column 47 failed then the entire building just collapsed into its own foot print at the speed of gravity (ie freefall). The premise is absurd and violates the basic laws of physics. In any case we know it was blown up due to eye witness testimony. Ron insana if I recall from abc news was there when it happened and he testified it was blown up deliberately.
Check out the black santa in a wheel chair lulz
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/11/22/23/78134173-12781649-image-a-8_1700695790425.jpg
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-67419951
Also just got arrested. Video of the incident if you have not seen it.
https://twitter.com/MrSilversmith/status/1718764771044929879
Even cnn reported live on the day that the building was about to blow up https://youtu.be/cU_43SwWD9A
At some point will realise the obvious, the wtc buildings were not immune from the basic laws of physics.