The ocean is basically the giant washing machine God gave us. Sure we can pollute it locally and temporarily, but over time (and I don't mean decades - just a few years) it will purify and clean up our messes.
All the scaremongering about the ocean is just as legit as the climate change propaganda.
My point is that we can accurately predict everything that happens in the sky - it runs like a clockwork that is quite knowable. What I am questioning is what we are told of how that reliability is maintained - i.e. "gravity" holding it all together at exact lengths and exact speeds that exactly repeat themselves year after year for 1000s of years. "gravity" as we know it would not achieve that sort of reliability and exactness, and would instead lead to a full decay of the orbit over time, or objects would eventually spin away from one another.
Also I should say this is not a flat-earth proof. I am only pointing out that our current models taught are just fairy tales and built on a house of cards. We needn't pretend that we know how the sky operates.
I think there are many compelling reasons to look into flat earth.
The suggestion that earth's atmosphere is held together by gravity, while it sits next to an infinite vacuum simply defies anything we know about physics. If space is vacuum it would be impossible for our atmosphere to exists without a solid barrier ("firmament") containing it.
It is absurd to suggest that the moon orbits around the earth in a perfectly predictable manner, like it was on rails, and this is from "gravity". Meanwhile the earth orbits around a sun in the same manner, in an exact same pattern for 1000s of years. all these forces at work moving balls millions of miles without one iota of decay or change. invisible strings is a more convincing argument than "gravity". Any scientific experiment regarding centrifugal force or attempting to model these type of orbits will invariably show decay and the 2 objects eventually collide or they fly away from one another. the predictable and reliable movements of the bodies in the sky simply has not been adequately explained by modern "science"
while not a proof of flat earth, the fact is NASA has been faking their space activities for 50+ years. They fake their photos of planets and the earth. Their videos of moon landings do not hold up as believable. There are videos showing fakes missions with the space shuttles. They are caught faking stuff with green screens on the ISS to this day. If they can't show us real videos and photos of the globe and space, why not? Its a valid starting point to question what else we are lied to about.
there are many many videos of people shooting lasers across lakes, where by the globe model the opposite side of the lake should be dozens (or even hundreds) of feet below the curvature, yet they are able to see the laster at eye level. These are reproduceable scientific tests that suggest the earth is flat, not round. of course this is just one type of test but it does demand explanation.
even without lasers, with zoom lenses and even clear days there are many examples of where we can see objects that based on curved earth math, would be below the horizon, but they aren't. Another easy example is one can see the island of capri all the way from Naples on a clear day. This simply shouldn't be possible with the globe.
practically speaking, this can be controlled by just a few middle managers in the marketing department, or contracted ((agency)). Imagine the C level who decides, "hey our avg customer is actually 90% white - can we have a white couple instead of this mixed race?" The next thing you know there is a whisper campaign and he is attacked as a known racist by midlevel employees and his career is destroyed.
If you watch that Bud light CEO talk, he is completely imprisoned by what he cannot say and is just trying to keep his 7 figure job. Its reminiscent of the soviet era where the communist party liason with the army could destroy a general's career anytime they saw fit.