▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I said to fight corruption within the framework we have

Framework we have is designed for corruption. Just think a little, why do you need a lawyer - a special professional whose job is to translate from juridical language to human and back? Why the laws are intrinsicly made so complex and written in inhuman language so you even need somebody else to deal with them? That's your framework.

which still works

Exactly. Still works. It is not a feature in a system. It is a bug. And it will be eradicated in the final lockstep.

Anyway, I don't need your validation to know what I do is right.

But you need that validation from the system. Don't be surprised if one day system will suddenly not validate things you doing.

I've got paying customers that say so to me.

Paying customers are nice, no doubt. But if they suddenly will choose system over you, you are doomed.

Payability of customers is not the only important property of customer. Loyalty could be much more important. Just recent example - haircutters during coronahoax. Those who had just paying customers go bankrupt. Those who had customers who don't give a fuck to the stupid laws and orders of the system and prefer haircutter over system - survived. And something tells me, that those haircutters who survived coronahoax didn't use "serious" banks with their "privacy" for receiving customer payments.

It is fascinating how fast many forgot everything they find out during very recent events, and latched back to indoctrinated dogmas as soon, as that events faded a little.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

You could not create a lasting popular online service as a once off thing over a few weekends.

So, it could not be because you think it could not be. OK.

If you could you would, and you'd be rich.

What exactly do you mean by "rich"? I have enough income and real assets for all my needs, why should I exert to make some irrevelant profit from something that is too simple to make money from that?

Just imagine, that I want to start yet another business on selling my web site solutions. I immidiately will met with a pressure of giant corporations who spent billions into lies about all things you think cosntitute modern web development. Why should I fight against that enormous machine in attempt to convince somebody that they don't need BigBrother overbloated solutions if they want to use that BigBrother solutions, because it is "modern", "fashionabe", "hyped"? And those who are really interested in my product and hate BigBrother solutions will perfectly find and use mine or just write their own using mine as example without any efforts from my side. So what could be the point of doing such business?

"do things better" than all the people more successful than you.

Successfull business you talking about is not about "do things better" at all. It is all about hype, marketing, vendor lock, SaaS, whatever. It is about making as much money as possible.

I prefer doing things better. Yes, that does not always bring as much money as possible. But making as much money as possible is not among my interests at all.

If I have a choice between making thing more complex with hiring people, spending more money with a potential more profit, or making thing as simple as possible so it will do the job forever without any additional attention in future, I'll prefer spend some time once for latter and forget about it, than to add all that business haemorrhoids for the sake of some potential profit.

Speaking about topic - you could see how overcomplicating things bring everything to the trash. There is a reason why KISS principle still exists and always win in the long run.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bolshevik talks is what you propose here. "Obey the laws", i.e. obey those dual citizens who wrote them. "Don't damage the system", i.e. allow dual citizens do what they do.

Your system never worked "just fine". It was designed specifically with jewish agenda in mind long ago. Exactly that system financed bolshevik jews in 1917. Just fine. That system finaced all wars of past century. Just fine. That system made jews untoucheable. Just fine. That system get rid of sound money. Just fine. That system introduced property and income taxes. Just fine. That system today is trying to exterminate everything that is not aligned with elites agenda. Just fine. That is what it was designed for. And you insist on keeping it. Nice try.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

But don't worry, people like me will pay the taxes

That is exactly what worrying me. :) You pay taxes, they create CBDC, bail out fallen banks, create coronahoaxes and fake wars with real losses.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nobody would pay for what you're creating, you're delusional dude.

I succesfully sold some of my "weekend writings" to the people who want simple and solid engine for their site. And it was their initiative, not mine. Some "weekend writings" are opensourced or given for free. So they are more than payable, potentially. Because they are good and people like them.

But I never thought about selling access to websites made with that engines "to keep the site running". Because it is a complete bullshit.

You want people to serve you for free, while you mooch off their free (slave) labor and resources.

Looks like you get everything in quite strange way. I don't need anybody to serve me. I could do all that by myself without any problems and even getting some fun doing that simple thing of creating web site. Why should I share my fun with somebody else at all?

From the other side, you need some slaves to do senseless job of "making website running", pay them with empty fiat currency that you collect from users of your website who was brainwashed by your marketing to use it. Insane endless cycle of doing nothing praising to some cut paper.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I missed something and now border guards do not allow carrier pigeons to fly by?

What about ham radio or hijacked satellite communications? They are somehow banned too?

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

A dating application is nothing like a static informational page.

So, you can't write a decent site engine good enough to not need permanent rewriteing, fixes and upgrades. OK.

And you still didn't explain why every web site should be a business demanding payments from the users.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

The rule of law

Is a jewish bullshit you was indoctrinated to believe.

then move to a serious bank

"serious" banks are much more corrupt, than small local ones. That is why small local banks are destroyed now worldwide.

The final version is going to be called CBDC

CBDC have nothing to do with conventional crypto at all except using blockchain. CDBC is really blockchain based bank card account Ver 2.0, and orthogonal to crypto. Crypto main feature is not blockchain, it is you being your own bank, exchange and SWIFT.

SBC enters the chat kek

You mean SBF? Stupid crypto exchanges and all that imbecile gambling have nothing to do with crypto. When last crypto exchange will fall it would be the best day of crypto. Crypto is not a gambling asset like stocks or whatever, if you are not aware, it is a payment system. You don't need something like FTX with SBF to use crypto at all.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you still think that, my words are wasted then.

Exactly. Because I know that.

you don't run an online businesses or contribute to one

I prefer creating real things for money.

Either way you have to pay people.

You still can't get that not everything is business. Probably you can't imagine that there are normally no any need to continuously rewrite, refactor, reinstall web site. You just spend few weekends for creating engine suitable for your task and that's all. If you are a sane man, there is no need to do something with it anymore. It just works. And other people use it. Why could you need to do something with, speaking theoretically, catalogue of Proshe 924 NLA parts resembling official PET(ETKA) but with parts blueprints suitable for DIY manufacturing? There is absolutely nothing to change, update, add or advertise at all. It is approx 5kb of JS for user interface with static JSON data describing catalogue structure, some images with exploded views of car systems and parts blueprints in PDF. Oh, and tiny CSS to make it look nicer. Of course you could write it using vue, PHP/Python/NodeJS, *SQL and tons of bells and whistles, hire 10 people to support all that bloatware, add ads, paid access and whine about little profit, but why the fuck anybody would do that?

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

"product" that absolutely requires the government-monopoly internet to function at all.

Crypto does not require "government-monopoly internet". It could work over any data transmission channels. Even carrier pigeons RFC1149. :)

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Last time I checked banks can't freely give away your transaction log without a court order.

What make you believe in that?

Bank privacy was complete bullshit long before creation of bitcoin.

Also, why even Switzerland was forced to ban anonymous bank accounts under a threat of shutting down SWIFT?

It is not transactions that is crucial for privacy. No any bank can guarantee privacy of transactions because there always will be transactions to another banks. It is anonymity of accounts that matters. And anonymity of accounts was totally banned long ago.

And if you want private transactions, then there are few cryptos with private transactions too. Monero is most popular one.

And about "court order". Fuck that shit about "court". If somebody could get anything about you from bank, than anybody could. It is just a simple question of bribe size.

With crypto there is nobody to bribe. At least anonymity problem is fixed by design. And transaction privacy is solved in some variants. And it is just a beta version of crypto technology, which is for unknown reasons was declared as something ready-to-use for peasants.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

You don't know anything about running an online business

OK, you know a lot. Wish you luck in your "online business". This does not change the fact that running a site is dirt cheap today. If asking donation or selling virtual things is your business model, that does not make running a site more expensive. That just make your business model look like selling air. Or you think that air should be traded for profit too, otherwise it is socialism?

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Online services worth paying for are.

No single online service worth paying, giving telephone number and very rare worth registering.

A dating service is a business, whether online or not.

It is insane. First, create a situatiion when people need dating service, then make money on that. :)

You've proven you don't know anything about running an online business of any significance.

I don't even want to know anything about running scam that produce nothing real.

real e-business in 2023

LOL. e-business can't be real.

A small business has needs for all sorts of things, customer service,

Why should it need third-party customer service? Phone calls banned?

continued development,

Nobody need that crap. CD/CI should be scorched to ashes with all those who push it. You don't need CD/CI for a stove or a lathe. So you don't need it for internet service.

administration,

What do you want to adminiter for small business?

marketing, like any business.

You mean spamming or writing lies about superior excellence of small business products in the hope somebody will be caught? Do you understand that best marketing strategy ever is to make a good, high-quality product? Customers will find it by themselves, gladly. And will be thankful for absense of marketing brainwashing. If you need any other marketing, you are a scammer, trying to sell some overpriced crap.

And of course creating a business that helps both clients and employees is a benefit to society.

What is benefit for society if your business just transact money for useless services in circles producing nothing real?

It is a destruction of society, not benefitting it.

There is no any value or virtue in "making business" for the sake of "making business" at all.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah your websites are so great nobody wants to pay for your service.

I just don't need that payments. I have a real job, why should I create stupid paywalls for people and count that tiny beans? Information should be free.

Meanwhile me and my clients make money online.

Yeah, go ahead. That's what Western GDP is made of. Nice. Most amasing thing is that you account that as something good and noble.

I'm not sure why you think small businesses should work for free for you, but that is not how it works.

Because not everything on Earth is a business. I don't account spreading the useful information or connecting people as a business. For me, business is creating real things in real world that are useful for real people. Everything else is a scam. So, even if I had paid to dig out some infomation from behind some paywall, I always make it free for others and never had any thought about making money from that.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah and you are still thinking in terms of the 90s of some simple text based website that does nothing.

You even don't realize, that today web server have less load because page render is done on the user side, in the browser, not on the server.

I work on modern web apps and it costs money to develop them and maintain them. Period. And this isn't just a plain website, it is an entire business.

So, you are part of the problem with web2.0 bloatware. You are part of the problem with insane demands for memory and CPU of modern browsers. And with high probability you use all that fucking JS "frameworks" like vue/react/whatever to make things much worse.

So, your incompetence and inability to develop an effective architecture and create simple and lightweight web site without using bloatware "frameworks" sponsored by corporations to be as memory and CPU hungry as possible, leads to excessive money spending on both server and client side. As expected. You are perfect corporations pawn helping them to sell and rent more hardware. Congratulations.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Try creating and running a web service yourself since it is so easy and takes no money. You never will because 1) You are a lazy socialist 2) You know you will be proven wrong.

Unlike you, I have dozens. Doing that from mid 90s. Many is not even a business connected. And, meanwhile, did you know, that this shitty web is only a part of internet? Not even most important.

Asking for donations "for keeping site running" is complete, total bullshit. You absolutely don't need anything expensive unless you collecting BigData from billions or doing MSM grade social shit.

As for socialists you hate - I saw nothing more socialistic than Western corporations. It is an essence of socialism in its worst possible form. And unlike you, I definitely know whar socialism is and how it is look like, since I was born in USSR.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course they should make money, that is how you keep the site running.

How about real job? Running site is nothing. Dozen bucks for domain name a year and hardly more than hundred bucks a month for server. That's all. I will never believe that this $101 a month is something that could not be afforded by average US citizen and he will need all that business entity, employees, donations and merch shit to "keep the site running". It is a complete bullshit.

Stupid socialist.

Do you understand that you just confirmed that is not about truth about vaccines, spreading info, community and so on, it is just about few people making money on those who have some specific views?

I will not be amased at all, if the same people also have "sites and communities" for those who sexually attracted to trees, those who restore old chainsaws, those who quit drinking coffee and so on. Nothing personal, just business.

This is not a first and not last business on users of that kind that was robbed or tricked by some side employee or activist.

To avoid that, never mix your rebellion with business in one thing.

Or you so afraid of socialism, that you believe that even rebellion must be turned into business, just to not look socialistic? :) OK, go ahead.

▲ 7 ▼
CrazyRussian 7 points ago +7 / -0

If you want the things to be done right, do them by yourself.

has captured the payment processing service, effectively eliminating the means of revenue for the company.

And that strange desire to necessarily make some money on users even when declaring doing some good and barely profitable thing...

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry, my knowledge of USA political system design is mostly based on "BrainDead" series, but how exactly he plans to prosecute all mentioned persons? Does he have a solid team who will take over current bureaucrats and that will allow him to do all that? How he plan to replace judges and prosecutors to make it real? How he plan to force House and Senate to allow him to do that?

And what does he think about criminal prosecution of politicians who failed to fulfill their promises that was given to voters?

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's dated earlier this month, my local police are either incompetent, or they don't care.

Or they care about getting good KPI (key performance indicators). It is much better for KPI to "resolve" cases like that in the way they do it, than to really do something useful for society like resolving government corruption, punishing corporations for their disregard to consumers, fighting real crime and so on.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do you think that moon landing is something that have to be believed or not believed?

It could be just checked directly. There is no any need for faith at all. Making religion from technical questions is complete insanity.

I know for shure that it was technically possible at the time. I did not know if they really do that. Resolving that question is technical problem that is perfectly solveable. Then why need for "believe"?

Eventually, places of declared landings will be visited and problem will be finally solved. Endless talking about believeing or not in moon landing gives absolutely nothing for technical resolution of that question.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hard to say. There are a lot of products that depend on climate, resources and so on. You can't have same price of oranges everywhere, f.e..

Pork is occasional match, really Russia a colder country, so growing a pig needs more energy. But energy is cheaper here, and that make price equal. Retailing pork does not depend on climate, but depend on fuel price, shop land price/taxes/rent and so on. So retailing here is cheaper.

Also currency rates, stock market games and so on.

However it could be interesting to convert prices into something fixed and independent, like total energy units needed to create product and compare.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wholesale pork is somewhere around $.80 a pound from producers.

Interesting. nearly same here if you buy a whole pig as dressed carcass from farm. ~130 RUR/kg = ~$.80/lb

Retailing adds a lot, yes.

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

CAD is something like 0.75 of USD so it is slightly less expensive than looks like. And IDK, may be it is possible to find pork cheaper, say CAD 5/lb in Toronto, but then math will bring even worse result. More than 1lb a day into poor baby? Perverts.

P.S. In Russia pork is ~300 RUR/kg on average i.e. ~$1.85/lb if you are interested. In regions could be slightly cheaper.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

she saves hundreds of dollars

Either meat in Canada is very expensive now, either it is just a plain lie.

Internet tell me that average pork price in Toronto is $10/lb. Expensive, yes, but not overhelmingly and I think still more than affordable for average Canadian. Let's just imagine that insects are free for her. So $200 is 20lb of pork. Baby just could not eat so many. Usual norm is ~100 g per day, or ~3kg/6lb of meat per month for year and a half old baby. Not avery adult could eat 20lb of meat per month or 300g per day.

Looks like those who write that articles really think that "math is racist" and should not be used at all, even to make lies look more credible.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›