▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do you think it is not a Russian false flag? Or you think Russian authorities are too honest for false flags? :) How is that if they are awfully evil? Do you understand that propaganda have to be at least logical to work. If you produce self-contradicting garbage, you get garbage instead of propaganda. Garbage in, garbage out.

Do you remember all that fallen drones in the forests close to Moscow? How do you think every single times they was found so fast? :) Did you ever try to find something in the endless forest if you don't know where it is? It is impossible. You need weeks if not months to find something so small. Unless you track or control that drones and know exactly where they fall.

I think Russian military multiple times hold fingers crossed for all that shitty Ukrainian drones looking at their attempts to reach Moscow in the hope they finally do that. But Ukrainians was too greedy for fuel. And finally, either Russian military launch their own, either Ukrainian drone finally did what Putin want.

Meanwhile Zelensky suddenly prolonged his stay in Finland. Wonder why?. :)

Also, nearly all Ukrainian officials screaming in panic that "IT IS NOT US!!!!111". Why is that?

Guess who benefit most from that spectacle?

Are you really that dumb, or you just do your job for 30 shekels?

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Inductor for current is like capacitor for voltage. It will continue to push current when it drops and resist current when it rises. In no way it can restore missing half wave.

In line conditioners that usually sold everywhere, if you ever disassembled one, you will see a relatively small inductors on each wire or a common mode choke with capacitors before and after. Somethimes semiconductor surge protectors (varistors) added. This circuit is mostly for supressing noise in power line and cutting noise that could come from devices you connect to it, and if it have supressors nothing more. In no way inductors and capacitors used could store enough power to restore somehow missed half wave. It is just a HF filter, usually designed to cut frequencies higher than 2kHz, nothing more.

Just tear down one and see that by your own eyes. You could even easily measure frequency characteristcs if you have a tunable frequency generator and multimeter.

Line stabilisers, are another beasts that switch windings when grid voltage drops or rises, to keep output in limits, they can't restore missing half wave too.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

A half wave gap in input power results in an exponential decay in output during that period as the magnetic field collapses.

It already collapsed because input voltage is zero. There is nowere to get power to create full halfwave that is missed.

Not all UPSs use relays, some designs use power switching semiconductors with a far faster switching time and they can respond a lot faster than either a mechanical contact or 1/60 of a second half cycle time which is 8 milliseconds

Most "smart" UPS have dealy while switching from mains to battery and back not because of speed of switching device, but because of unsyncronized mains and internal DC-AC converter. Imagine mains power disappear at the top of sine wave, while DC-AC converter is at the bottom. You will have a problem with twice of grid voltage rapid swing with all consequences. So, UPS have to wait while its DC-AC converter output will reach zero to safely switch to it. Usually things are even simplier - if mains disappear, UPS just switch to DC-AC convertor and start it. This takes time. Also many use the same transformer for mains voltage stabilisation and charging and for DC-AC converter that also limits speed of switching.

UPS manufacturers cheat with speed of reaction to power grid changes, showing time of reaction for grid voltage stabilisation mode, which is done by switching between additional transformer winding parts that does not need any delay or sync, and not for switching from grid to battery and back.

I saw "smart" UPS that constantly run separate DC-AC converter in sync with grid, to make the switching process fast and safe, but they are not a cheap ones you usually see on the market and cost a little less than normal online UPS that just have no any switching process at all.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

So called "smart" UPS produce glitches too. When grid power is OK, they connect it to the output directly. On the power loss they switch to battery powered DC-AC converter or switch additional windings on power transformer. For price saving reasons they do it with relays. All that processes create noticeable glitches in output. Moreover, to avoid need for syncronisation of grid frequency with DC-AC converter ones, "smart" UPSes usually skip at least half of AC period while switching from mains to battery and back.

I don't even mention all that "line conditioners" They perfectly pass half wave gaps that gives noticeable glitch on the output of loaded power supply. They are fine only for cutting high frequency noise from power grid.

So, only online UPS are useful for real protection against glitches, since they always create output from scratch (48-96V DC) using their DC-DC and DC-AC converters, so nothing from input could crawl to the outpur and switching from mains to battery and back is seamless.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Really, only UPS that have value are online ones. They take AC and convert it to DC at around 48-96V. Batteries (usually 12V ones connected in chain to get that 48-96V) give out same voltage. Batteries and output of AC-DC converter connected together through diodes. Regardless of what source is giving power, that 48-96V DC then converted to 155 or 315V DC depending on grid voltage, 110V AC or 220V AC. This 155/315V DC then converted to 110/220V AC sine. There are no direct connection between input and output and switching to battery and back occur absolutely seamless. When mains disappear, current continue to flow from batteries like nothing happened. When power is back, you get current from AC-DC converter again. Last stage in that scheme, DC-AC converter, is really not necessary for most tech usually connected via UPS.

You could find parts of online UPS as separate modules, also today you could find modules for building solar power systems based on online UPS principle, when in addition to mains AC-DC converter and battery, to the same 48-96V DC rails also connected solar panels that will be used when they give enough voltage in absense of grid power. Or they will charge batteries if grid is OK. So you could build DIY cheap online UPS using this modules, car batteries and whatever additional source of electricity you have and get a power source that will seamlessly move from one source to another and back by design. If you need it only for modern devices with switching power supply, you don't need to buy final DC-AC converter, which is usually not something cheap, due to expensive high-voltage high-power transistors, you could power your tech from 155/315V DC without any issues.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don't need sine wave line controller to power your equipment with AMD processors. All power supplies are switching ones now, so you could power them from DC current of apropriate voltage. Power supplies will be perfectyl happy with that and you could save a decent amount of money getting rid of sine wave driver that makes AC from DC which is completely unnecesary for switching power supplies.

Interesting, that today very few applications really need AC power. It is mostly motors, things that still use transformer power supplies and things with triac power regulator. All other things will run on DC without any problem.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am not really convinced this is something that has happened, I mean, I don't know shit

"I don't know" is perfectly fine answer for any normal human. Unlike those experts in everything who flooded every single information flow.

We just don't know. Existing evidences, or what is posed as evidences just are not convincing enogh to make any solid conclusion. It is absolutely normal thing, when something is not clear. And it is a huge red flag for me when somebody have answers to anything.

consider all the engines purchased since the collapse of the nasa systems.

I think it was more financial decision than technical. Why order development of overpriced engines on the West when you can buy cheap Russian ones and put the difference in the pocket?

Surely this led to the musk rockets, from what I understand it is the russian engine tech with mods.

Initially, Musk tried to buy whole Russian rockets, even before Space X. He was in Russia twice and look for empty ballistic missiles for a decent price, however, he didn't take in account that rocket itself is not the most expensive thing in the whole rocket launch system. Russian engines are used in Atlas V rockets and many other Western projects. Interesting that few years before 2020s shitty mess, US rocket manufacturers fill their stocks with RD-180s, like they know what's coming beforehand. However, Musk finally accepted that he had to spend a lot if he want to enter space industry and decided to develop his own engines. It is a sane decision, it is always better to own crucial tech than to buy it from somwhere. I don't know if he designed his own engines or copied Russian ones for Falcons, but it does not really matter. His decision was correct.

I think we are in a religious war

Kind of. It is a war between different elites who believe religiously in their own vision of NWO and simultaneously against anything that does not fit their common NWO narratives.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

You and I both know the 'alien technology' is simply leftist speak for rocket technology

I'm not shure about that. If aliens ever visited Earth there should be something. Fact that all known tech is perfectly tracked to humans origins does not prove that alien technology does not exist.

stolen from Russians.

That's not true. Yes, Tsiolkovsky put a basement for modern rocket tech in Russia, but that was only theory, practice began decades later. West had their own rocket tech and traditions, mostly from Third Reich, that developed rocketry in parallel with USSR. USSR and Germany even cooperate in 1930s in that field. After WWII rocket tech divided into two separate branches. Every single rocket today is a successor to Third Reich or USSR tech or a combination of both, f.e. Russian engine with Western body.

The west and nato have not developed anything usable in the past 20 years that I know of.

That's the point. Is it not clear if it is intentional destruction or a side effect of education degradation.

You are too good to speak to this eisenhorn jew criminal

They tell interesting things from time to time. Occasionally. Tracking narratives they believe is sometimes useful for connecting the dots.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sure. Open a thread about it. What makes you think that I would defend any of this?

I'm trying to sligtly damage your selectivity. If you think that some things countries do looks questionable for you, then Russia is not even in the top 10 for you to care about.

Russia can try to touch it and see what happens.

Already. You could clearly see what happening. And NATO could do absolutely nothing to stop it. Moreover, it only makes things much worse.

Mothballed arms that got pulled out of storage

So, glorious NATO can't afford to supply its new "ally" against worst enemy with modern weapons? What does it tell you about NATO? Are you shure that wonderweapons are real? TR3B anybody?

are wreaking Russia's best stuff.

None of best stuff was ever wreaked. And nearly all significant damage to the Russian Forces was done only by old Soviet weapons according to statistics. From old Soviet drones to old Soviet S300.

So, NATO weapons are literally useless on the battlefield. Fuck, Even that M16 rifles are thrown by Ukrainians in favour to Soviet AK. Who needs assault rifle that needs "return to manufacturer for maintenance" after usual dirt bath and permanent cleaning and servising to just work?

What do you think will happen if NATO would go all out against Russia with its modern equipment?

What modern equipment? White House is protected by Norwegian NASAMS that is proved useless in Ukraine. Or you want to tell that White House is protected by outdated crap? Then what crap is not outdated, and what targets that are more important than White House that protected by something much better than NASAMS? Name me something.

TR3B, anyone?

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can't even imagine how ridiculously your question sounds. :)

I'll try any case. When Germany finally defeat Bavaria? When US finally defeat Montana? When France finally defeat Normandy? Your question is exactly the same.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

80 Million vaccinated in Russia. Your point?

Percentage with account for corruption, please.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

NATO is more about compulsory sales of enormously overpriced things to those who theoretically could make weapons by their own much cheaper and better along with development of their own industry. Even those members who made some weapons by themselves pay a huge patent fees for mandatory "NATO standard" things that are patented by US MIC. Without that payments weapons could not be certified for NATO standard and allowed for duty.

US itself occupied by same WEF/Bilderberg/whatever stooges as European countries that are NATO members. So, NATO adds nothing to the politics and narratives that are pushed. Also, NATO is not a greenlight for US troops on the ground, it is local politicians that are, regardless of membership in NATO.

Also NATO even do not prevent or prohibit hostilities between members, Turkey and Greece with their eternal war are excellent example.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Russia invaded Ukraine. Russia needs to suffer for this

Hillarious! :)

Let's talk about how US needs to suffer for invasions into Korea, Vietnam .... (long list)... Libya, Syria.

Oh, wait, US is already suffering. But somehow only regular Americans suffer, not the pervert pedofile elites that do all that shit since WWII, who don't care about regular Americans at all.

Or how about Israel that invaded Palestine and somehow do not need to suffer for this? What if your wet dream about Putin dethroning become true and Russia finally began to provide weapons and resources to Palestinians on the full scale? You will also scream about unprovoked "invasion" into peaceful Israel?

And I have a very interesting question. Do you have any sane reason why do you think that NATO thing is untoucheable and is not allowed be harmed at all? Who told you that? Why do you believe in that? How that NATO is different from some self-proclaimed ISIS? Why it think that it can't be defeated? Who told you that NATO have any right to exist? Do you know that it is not the first military western alliance at all? May be first so commercial, but who cares about money except jews? Do you know how infamously all previous Western military alliances ended? And Russia is still here.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

When will mighty Russia finally defeat the weak Ukraine?

Russia do not defeating Ukraine. It trying to defeat West, again, despite all Putin attempts to slow this down.

Again, why Western MIC can't just switch to producing necessary 152mm shells instead of useless 155mm for Ukraine? West somehow lost its last engineers that could do that simliest switch? Diversity hiring? Or level of education? Lawyers, pension advisers or trans activists are more useful for Western society?

Stupid 152mm shells just can't be produced on the West. Already. Fascinating.There is nothing to talk about anymore. World don't give a fuck to the West anymore.

And may be you know where is that legendary US TR3B military planes? With all that alien technologies and so on. That's the only rumor about Western technology that still was not clearly debunked. Or TR3B blueprints was lost like blueprints of Saturn V rockets?

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hm, lets see. How many vaccinated in the West vs Russia? Oops. How many tolerant to LGBTXYZ+ crap in West vs Russia? Oops again. How many believe in banks in West vs Russia? How many support climatehoax in West vs Russia.? How many believe MSM in West vs Russia? How many believe in so called "elections" in West vs Russia? How many people circumcised in the West vs Russia?.... I could continue endlessly. So who is really brainwashed?

Unfortunately West is much more brainwashed than Russia. Even you know everything about Russia only from lying mouths of its worst enemies and even don't try to suppose that you was lied all way long. It is very unfortunate because there are no any hope that Western people will take the right side in the battles against NWO.

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm waiting for all the Russian magic tanks that were supposed to crush Ukraine's resistance, instead, Russia is pulling 70-year-old tanks out of storage.

CNN told you that? OK, I'm perfectly fine with that.

It is hillarious, how Western propaganda works against West itself. Do you know, that wartime propaganda should damage an enemy, not you? Russian retards don't even need to do anything, West is succesfully mislead itself, better than any stupid Russian propagandist could do.

I suspected that Western elites are not very smart, but I didn't realise how low they fall.

It is fascinatiing to see, how that artificial conflict intended by the West to damage Russia really works in the interests of coming NWO. Only 10 years ago it was not clear how NWO could destroy Western society. It was something unimaginable. And now West successfully destroy itself with balls to the wall.

Go ahead, continue to lie to yourself. Your contribution into NWO may be will be rewarded somehow. Social credit points or carbon credits, IDK.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because he has NATO in shooting range of the only road to Murmansk.

Shooting with what exactly? US MIC somehow manage to make simple M777 howitzer that freeze dead even in Ukrainian winter.

And, meanwhile, there are few midget Baltic countries who are in NATO for a long time (and going to the bottom in all possible spheres since then). They are much closer to the critical Russian infrastructure than Finland.

Because NATO gained 1300km of border with Russia that Russia now how to worry about.

And somehow it is nor Russia that build a wall on the border, but Finland. How is that? Why Finns suddenly began to be so afraid that began to spend tons of money for that wall?

It is hillarious. Putin is afraid, but it is Finnish government who build a wall on their side in panic.

Do you know that US and Russia have a direct Russia-US border? Interesting, does US build a wall on the Western Alaska beach too?

Because Russia is getting held back by outdated NATO weapons while being unable to field any of their alleged Wunderwaffen.

So, NATO have nothing except outdated NATO weapons? Russian wunderwaffen meanwhile perfectly kill US officers in underground bunkers and destroys what NATO send to Ukraine. Send more officers and what remains of NATO weapons.

And that total, outstanding shame - All West MIC for more than a year can't start manufacturing of fucking 152mm Soviet standard shells for the only reliably working howitzers that their "ally" have.

I can't imagine how retarded and destroyed West industry is that it can't just adjust their factories from 155mm to 152mm shells. Diverse hiring?

Because Russia has lost tens of thousands of soldiers while NATO hasn't lost a single one.

NATO losses is around 1000 killed, and who knows how many wounded. And it is a worst result even in comparison with poor Ukraine conscripts. Those rare who survived, meanwhile, began to tell things that are very uncomfortable for Western elites. And then completely silenced by Western media. IDK, may be those NATO warriors who survived in Ukraine are in Western jails without conviction, as is tradition now in US.

One year in, Russia has lost a significant amount of territory that they had occupied in the early days of the war and you sheep still believe the propaganda that somehow NATO is the one being decimated.

Who care about territory? It will be taken when all Western crap and fighters for trans rights and "democracy" will be destroyed.

Speaking about territory, no single inch of territory of DPR or LPR who asked Russia for military assistance against Ukrainian invaders was occupied. Additionally, two more regions was added to Russia. So, instead of only DPR and LPR Ukraine lost two more regions.

NWO had already split the planet to the zones of influence. There is nothing US could do about it. Taiwan will join China, Russia will return most of USSR and may be Warsaw treaty countries, US could take Canada, f.e., but it seems Western elites are the dumbest among others, and laundering fake money that would become obsolete as TPTB will be ready with next stage of NWO.

Meanwhile, about Finland. Do you realize, that increasing number of voters makes unanimous voting less possible? And NATO demand unanimous votes for neraly everything. Finland and Sweden are old enemies. Finland exists only because once Russia free Finland from Swedes. Finland highly depends on Russia, and Sweden hates Russia. When Sweden will be accepted into NATO, there will be yet another point of discord in that retarded organization, in addition to Greece-Turkey, Hungary-Germany and so on. Some sane Western minds long ago warned that accepting too many countries with mutual tensions into NATO is a bad idea.

So, there are no any reason for Putin to give any fuck. Especially, when he have TPTB approval for everything he do.

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm waiting for that fucking TR3B alien technology planes over a year. Nothing. Do they really exist, or it is just another product of CIA disinformation campaign planted into UFO fans circles for whatever reason? Does US have something real at all, speaking about weapons?

▲ 6 ▼
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

And it is somehow bad for Putin because... ?

Everybody knows how crappy that overpriced western weapons are, thanks to the war in Russian outskirts. US military are mRNA vaccinated LGBTXYZ+ garbage that have even higher casuality rate than poor Ukrainians in Ukraine. Does US even have weapons that could work in Finland climate? Or there will be only Norway useless overpriced crap? How that base could be protected from a salvo from short-range Russian MLRS? Where US would get staff for that bases? It is not a nice warm Middle East or Panama, it is severe North.

So why Putin should give a fuck when enemy doing yet another stupidity?

Also, do you realise, that if your wet dream about Putin suicide somehow come true, his successor would not be so servile and patient with the Western perverts and liars. I told numerous times - Western elites and their shills should pray for Putin health and well being constantly. Putin is their only hope for some kind of NWO and safety of jews. You definitely don't want to face one who will take Putin's place.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

That CO2 hype looks like part of that climate change shit. reinhaling CO2 is not the main problem of the masks. Lack of oxygen is.

Let's look at natural levels of oxygen and CO2 humans regulary deals with.

Humans breath in 0.04% of CO2 and exhale 4% CO2. 10000% difference. Humans also are very tolerant to CO2 levels, because in the past, when our ancestors evolved/created (depending on your beliefs), levels of CO2 in atmosphere was much higher, up to 0.15%. Levels higher than 0.15% considered inapropriate. It is 375% difference.

Things are very different with oxygen. Humans inhale 20% oxygen and exhale 16% oxygen. Oxygen levels less than 17-18% (10% change)is accounted as harmful worldwide. 16% is already critical. Just 25% change.

Humans are magnitude orders more sensitive to the changes in oxygen levels that to the changes in CO2 levels. Compare 25% and 10000% of endurance for levels we deal with constantly or 10% and 375% of endurance for official harmful levels. But, suddenly, nobody talk about oxygen deprivation. They talk only about much less harmful elevated CO2 level. Guess why. Elevated CO2 levels is crucial part of climatehoax.

So, they agree to tell you a thruth that masks are harmful, but they tell only what is useful for their other agenda.

Lack of oxygen is what do most harm from masks, not CO2 levels. Also, bacterial growth and collecting pathogens from ambient air is more harmful than higher CO2 levels too.

That is how they continue to push their fucking climate change and "awful CO2" agenda even when you think they finally tell you some truth.

So, if you for whatever reason want to argue to NPCs, talk about oxygen, not CO2.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you could not explain what do you mean in clear plain words.

I don't care about your indistinct feelings, sorry.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Show me quotes of how God despises pride

There are too many changes in modern English in the meanings of the words, I could miss something. What do you mean under "pride" exactly - arrogance, honor, LGBTXYZ+ crap or something else?

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have a Bible. In ancient Russian. What you are interesting in? I know that Western variants are heavily redacted. I could help with that, because my Bible is much closer to the source. May be we should start from "Not an authority if not from God"? Or you believe that current pedofile elites who you obey are from God?

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

and let the adults do the work.

If you don't get it yet, I'm more or less satisfied with how that "adults" do the "work". And why not, if these "adults" destroying their own system at unprecedented rate.

I'll be perfectly fine when the society will be finally divided into sheeple strapped by all that CBDC, banks, DigitalIDs, government and all that crap and normal people who don't give a fuck about all that crap, will use it in their own way if necessary.

It is much easier to fake and workaround something digital, than something oldschool.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

A good product speaks for itself right? So you don't need magical "brainwashing" marketing, lol.

Exactly. But why should I necessarily make money from that?

People copying my weekend solutions cost nothing for me. They don't bother me, and even if they make something useful or even profitable from that, why should I care? They don't bother me, I don't bother them. Why should I make it into business? I just don't see any reason. I have perfectly running real-world businesses with profits that covers all my needs, why should I need another one that will demand additional investments, attention and efforts from me?

Take a look at file exchange services, f.e. There was a lot of commercial ones that pop up and died, round and round. And suddenly, only non-profit torrents outlived them all, and will outlive any existing commercial ones.

Just deal with the fact, that there are a lot of things that should never be made into business if you whant them survive. Obviously, anti-BigPharma movement is one of them.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›