▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are you claiming that international treaties made with and by Russia are not relevant and can be ignored if you don't agree with a former government?

As any other treaty signed by any government. It's all bullshit. All that treaties looks working only when it is profitable for NWO goals.

Yes it was

When and where? Show me an old Ukrainian coin, f.e. Anything that could be accounted as a sign of soverign state. And if you think that a "fact" from Ukrainian history schoolbooks about digging Black Sea by ancient Ukranians could be a proof, or some shit written by some US think tank, don't even try.

You are such pathetic losers.

I think it is very good, that official West push that crap. Especially because they themselves began truly believe in that. Let it be so. May be, we, the losers of all countries, all over the globe will have a chance, thanks to that self-hypnosys of elites.

Could have had a thriving economy and a stable nation and instead you build 1 billion palaces for your mafia boss dictator and buy him and his cronies fleets of yachts.

Something like US, yes? With all that crazy billionaries with private jets, yachts and multibillion mansions, who try to kill their own population, senile and insane bureaucrats, industry that produces only advertising, ultimate levels of censorship and so on? Wait a minute, could you explain how it differs from what we have now in Russia? I think Russian elite become a perfect apprentices of their Western gurus. They do exactly same things Western elites do. Just may be in sligthly less concealed way.

Oh, I got it. We don't have LGBTXYZ+ woke crap and BLM here, and did not stole natural resources from others. Yes, Russia definitely have to be destroyed for that.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Russia accepted Ukraine"s borders.

You mean Russian NWO government installed after USSR fall, that was busy with robbing population and destroying Russian industry signed some shitty papers prepared for them by NWO?

Do you know that Yeltsin, Shushkevich and Kravchuk conspiracy in Belovezhskaya puscha in dividing USSR was completely unlawful and directly contradicted the will of people of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus on referendums they organized before?

You literally have no any idea how things really was. And turnning to some silly papers signed by criminals in secret and against will of population.

And stupid Putin, being shill of NWO too, for some "unknown" reason still continue to recognize that agreements, Ukriane government and existence of Ukraine mockup state. That is one of the best proof that he is NWO shill.

Interesting, do you obey to official papers and laws that was signed by coronahoaxers? Are you insist that it should be obeyed, because some criminals sign them?

It's a sovereign nation and Russia invaded it.

Not a single second Ukraine was a sovereign nation. It never was a nation too, nor genetically, not culturally. You will find no any sign of sovereignity through millenias.

Do you know, that second president of Ukraine, Kuchma, wrote a book named "Ukraine is not Russia" that became nearly mandatory in Ukraine. Why would "sovereign nation" need to create and force such book in first place? Does some American leader had a need to force something named "Americans are not Brits"? Or may be you have another example of necessity to push similar narrative on some nation?

Stop this bullshit about "sovereign state/naton". There are barely any sovereign states in the world today, you can't even talk about sovereignity of USA,China,Russia, but some country named "Outskirts" somehow "soverign". Do you understnad, how ridiculously that sounds?

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

And how do you see the returning of stolen land without inavasion?

Why the Western people think that Ukraine is some state at all, when it is absolutely obvious that it is a pure mockup, atrificial and senseless on the lands that stolen from Russia and Poland (and in a little part from Hungary and Moldavia/Romania)? Right from its name that means literally "outskirts" in Russian and any other Slavic language and completely artificial "language" no single person could speak fluently.

This mockup is heavily used by NWO since the fall of USSR for every single dirty shit you could imagine. If you think that indoctrinating children in schools with NWO crap is something new, then think again. NWO conducted an outstanding experiment on that matter in Ukraine much earlier, when they literally forced studens from the lowest grade to learn fake history, fake language, fake literature and so on. Nearly everything half of Ukraine citizens younger that 30 years believe is a total lie. And even after that they still can't fluently speak, even when forced, in that artificial "Ukrainian language" NWO developed for Ukrainians, and on every occasion fall back either to plain Russian, either to Ukrainian dialect of Russian, ether to Polish, Hungarian or Moldavian, depending of their ancestry and region.

And somehow those who gravitate to NWO myths about Russia and their parts, suddenly, completely forgot that everything they know about Russia and around they know only from Russia's worst enemies, that continously and endlessly liying to them about everything else. It is impossible to deny coronahoax, terroristhoax, moonhoax, vaccinehoax, climatehoax, ozoneholehoax, wokehoax, racismhoax and everything, and at the same time believe in existence of "Ukraine".

Now, as usual, as it always used to be, Ukraine mockup state used in just another dirty plan of NWO. And it looks like that plan works absolutely great against Western population.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

My idea was that in simplified AR I could use LCD/LED 7segment indicators instead of matrix LCD and get rid of annoying pexilisation that way. Just to get multimeter readings in air right near the place where I stick the probes.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ayh have been FP on HaD .com 26 times :)

Greetings, buddy! I often commented on HaD at the time.

Used to utilize their io project pages but they went woke so ayh dumped it. Real shame.

Yep, they go woke after sell. Pity. Had an io page too. :)

The first phase will lkely adopt the exist large television,

Probably, but the pixel count will grow proportional to square of diagonal. Since the living room limit the distance from screen you can't just make screen larger, because pixel size will destroy immersivity and perception.

room sensors and AR

AR seem to be stalled. Oculus Rift barely alive and I didn't saw any development. However AR is promising tech, I even thought about making an oversimplified bluetooth version of AR addon for safety goggles just to display multimeter measurements and similar stuff at the point of view to eliminate the distraction on multimeter display.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

At early stages, when owner had not censored results yet, you could use it to extract potentially interesting data that represents most popular views on different topics among population.

IDK about extracting some connected info about specific person. May be you will be able to get some result occasionally, but it could be not real data, but what most people think about it.

To seriously analyze things you talk about, you need completely different system, known as "expert system", that is not that "expert systems" that are just a name for same ANN thing, but completely another type of data processing, when algorithm build a structures with connections and classifications that allow receiving answers like "who is the people Bill Gates meet more often" or "list of corporations that spent money on satellite surveillance with sums and considering possible proxy companies". However, development of that kind of systems was abandoned nearly 20 years ago in favor of ANNs we see everywhere today.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Holographic boxes are not really holographic. :) Just a marketing thick.

Creating 3D image is a tricky thing. Hologram is pretty cool, but to make a realtime holographic display you need insane resolution to create a fine difraction grating that will create desired 3D image. And you obviously need enormous computing power to calculate that extremely high resolution images with thousands of megapixels for a decent viewport size. It is ultimately interesting thing, you could even play with it using tiny display module from cheap pico projector, but it is impossible with current tech to do something useable. And it is not that floating in the air objects everybody think about, it's more like a window with 3D objects behind. But it is still pretty cool, because of nearly infinite depth and possibility to observe created contents just like you observe the world from window. Imaginary world you could create behind that window is larger than window itself. And it is slightly foggy and opalescent (like static holograms made on photoplates you probably saw), because to create clear picture you need nearly infinite resolution. With display from pico projector you will get only single-color hologram that need laser light to produce image. It depends on method of how pixels change optical properties of surface. To create a colorful hologram you need another type of display module that change phase, not amplitude of light that bounce of pixel, much more expensive than one from pico projector.

Aslo there are another ways to create 3D images, like rotating helix f.e. Most impressive thing I saw is this. Opensource, meanwhile - https://hackaday.io/project/180304-vvd-an-open-source-real-3d-volumetric-display I think it is closest possible thing to all that SciFi movies 3D displays.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Censorship.

I like the irony. The only entity in the whole internet who thought about censoring FE is a hardcore conspiracy forum. All other places, even most censored, are pretty fine with FE. And so much butthurt from FE crowd. Like they don't have all that thousands of other places where to swarm freely. No, they need only that tiny forum to dance.

Hilarious.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you take a random sample from the closest puddle and add some random spice from kitchen along with pinch of dust and bit of table salt, you will get something similar from the drying drop on the glass plate under microscope.

Study is flawed. They didn't even tried figure out exact chemical composition of vaccine to begin with. Then, it is hugely seasoned with statements about some RF stuff while they don't even bother to expose their samples to RF to find out what will happen. It is the same grade of bullshit as studies that showed "efficience" of not-a-vaccines. Both are disgusting mockery of real science.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

If we put into context the idea of the phone and something like Alexa you need to concept the idea expanded to standing up the morning, walking into the next room and saying xyz and the entire room projection being where you need to go, shop, work, etc.

Did you ever tried that in real? Entire room projection looks so unnatural, that you will shut it down after few minutes. Things get worse when you move around the room.

To get something acceptable you need round screen around you with you staying in center. After some fight with yourself, you might find what you see more or less apropriate.

And that tech limitations. Imagine computing power needed to drive that insane amount of pixels. For nothing.

There is no any technology yet, that could make that idea of immersion acceptable.

I perfectly understand the idea you talk about, but it can't be implemented consumably in at least several decades, or even more. You need some outstanding technological breakthrough, like holograms or another image creation technology.

If you think this is not attractive to people remember that in just 10 years people have literally become consumed to notification slavery, hunching over and shopping and swiping for people and products.

Exactly, and that's why that metaverse doomed. People already have a simple and cheap way to live in virtual reality. It is just limited to a screen of the phone or computer monitor. There is no any demand for virtual access to anything anymore. Especially if new alternative looks ugly and cost more than any consumer will ever have to spend.

Problem is already solved, that is why attempt to solve it again will never succeed.

Ayh know we want to romanticize human beings but.. cities are filled in the millions with people who never go outside other than from home to work.. and they demonstrated in the hoax shutdown they would gladly stay home.

Those who want that way of life already have it, that's the point. Order food or goods in phone app, wait for delivery boy, enjoy the meal and gain more money doing some hob remotely. All that was in place long before coronahoax, and really coronahoax even slightly damage that, you know, people notice the importance of some things only when that things are lost.

Cities are our enemies.

Totally agree. There are no reasons for urban living anymore. In the past, cities concentrated workforce and bureacracy in one place to make things simplier. Today there are no any real reason for that. It is purely about control over people and depriving them from everything natural.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its a pity that moderator instruments on that forum are limited, as moderators abilities themselves.

Ideal solution for apropriate discussion would be to force the opponent to clearly answer for any legitimate ontopic question. Just hiding any messages (but keeping them available for all to check the nature of a person) that do not contain clear answer, may be with lowering some score with every message without answer or any sign of well-known dishonest conversation like changing topic and so on. Same with senseless and malformed questions like "Did you drop drinking wiskey in the morning". But it is too hard to implement that in reality, on that forum, in politics, in media, everywhere.

So, here we are.

However, I had a lot of very interesting useful and pleasant conversations here, with different people even on topics we was not agree on and a lot of original thoughts I never saw anywhere else. It will be sad if that forum will turn into the nest of parrots repeating their narratives without any original thoughts with rare normal people hiding between parrots screaming.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm not registered in that garbage bin. And never would be. And I prefer text over audio and especially video. The nature of human brain makes text the best way to share information. Because audio and especially video take a lot of resources just to extract useful information. Continous flow of expensive to decode data makes things worse, leaving no time to critically process incoming information. That is why video is always preferred by those who push narratives.

Things are even worse, if you dig deeper.

When you read text, you completely control your attention, information flow, you could reread anything that is not clear and do search and math just copying part of text you want to check.

Video is completely another thing, and you can't even imagine how it is dangerous for your mind.

When you look at turned off monitor, you could notice that it is covered by some dust and specked with flies. You completely control your attention and choose what to see and how. But when you turn monitor on and play video, fascinating thing happens. It is not you who is in control anymore. It is operator or video editor who manipulating your attention changing images and highliting things they want. Adding that most of resources of your brain busy with accepting incoming information, things become even worse. Really, video itself replaces your consciousness and finally you get just video watching itself. There is no any subject in that process anymore. So, there is nobody left who could notice that change and even nobody reasoned to do that.

That is why all malicious influencers, including flatearthers always prefer video and constantly push their target audience to their youtube shit.

Fuck your videos. Fuck your BirBrother Youtube. Fuck your methods and goals. You choose a wrong forum to attack.

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

It is a moving dish of SBX (Sea-based X-band Radar) used by US military to track satellites. All layers of Earth atmosphere is transparent for X band (around 10GHz), so it can't be used to heat anything in Earth atmosphere.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's even became boring. They do the same mistake again and again, and don't even try to fix it before the release.

Obviously, today only conspiracy theorists talk about 9/11, so most volume of recent texts in internet about 9/11 contain conspiracy theorists point of view. If you train ANN on that data, there is absolutely no any surprise that ANN will produce most "popular" result.

There is no mistery in result, there is mistery why that obvious result was not prevented by those who select materials to train ANN. Are they so self-confident that they don't care about it, or they just doing things without understanding how they really works?

I could easily imagine dialogue like that:

  • Create that modern thing immidiately!!! Our competitors already have it!
  • OK, but we need data to train it
  • Here is access to all we stored from our stupid cattle who think they are users.
  • But it is a bad idea, we could get unwanted results on that data.
  • How dare you to dispute my decision! I'm a black lesbian gender-fluid queer, I'm your boss, I know better, go do the job, the deadline is yesterday, I don't want to explain investors that we failed releasing most fashionable product just because some brown indian guy, who even is not a gay had some stupid doubts.

Yes, we have cyberpunk we definitely deserve.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, it's more than reasonable.

NAVY heavily invest in any low frequency things, because huge wavelength allow radiowaves to reach submarines under the sea surface. Skin effect depends on wavelength, so longer RF waves get deeper into conducting objects. And salted water is a good conductor, so any normal RF band communication is impossible. Of course they will invest heavily into the tech that will allow realtime communication that will not reveal the position of submarine under the surface like ultrasound communications do.

Interesting, why they donated original to university? They didn't get satisfying results, or on opposite - they did, and that thing lost its significance for them?

Meanwhile idea of transferring huge amounts of energy into ionosphere came to Tesla mind first. So, could it be possible, that both, NAVY and university tried to replicate Teslas project secretly? Just to check if it works, and if it is, to study it and find out a way to disrupt it, as such technology could be a potential threat to the TPTB?

▲ 6 ▼
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is not HAARP antenna. Device of that size will be extremely unefficient for transmitting even AM, not talking about VLF and ELF.

HAARP antennas is a fields of long wires on masts, not some cool-looking rotating device with a giant dish.

But that's not the point, really. The point is that there is no any sane model of ionosphere, not even talking about its interference with weather and Earth crust, so, even if you could energize ionosphere to the levels it could do something with weather and earthquakes, you still can't predict the results.

Potentially, HAARP could be used to do some damage to power lines, f.e, or create some problems for radio communications like aurora do. Something like artificial magnetic storm, hand-made Carrington Event.

As for earthquakes, IDK, I could imagine that they are insane enough to shoot the bullet randomly, but they definitely don't want to occasionaly destroy their manisons and castles.

Earthquakes in that region are not rare things, that region have severe earthquakes from time to time, f.e. Spitak earthquake in 1988 with magnitude of 10 and ~40K dead/~500K wounded. Spitak is in Armenia, ~500 miles from current earhquake. There was no HAARP in 1988.

HAARP is interesting beast, but I doubt it could create an earthquakes, especially that precisely.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

That will be even more crappy than VR headset.

Metaverse as a whole is a bunch of stupidiest ideas, from the tech point of view. They could be made looking attractive in marketing ads, but will be completely unuseable in reality.

There is definitely something else with that metaverse hype, but that definitely not that crap they propose for users.

Remember, when IoT was something new and fashionable, they told how cool it would be to turn lights in the room on and off from your phone? That was not cool in reality. I don't know a single person who used that shit more than few times after installing only to brag before his buddies. It is unuseable, and mechanical switch in right place have useability orders higher. That IoT things ended either in trash with switches back either IoT switches was set in right places just to not rewire everything. People still turn the light on and off with switches, not through phone app as advertised.

Same with all other stuff "invented" for the sake of "modernisation" and "creating future" by some "visioner" hipsters completely alienated from reality. And Metaverse is like the essence of all bad and worst "inventions" of that retards.

Also, usually at the start, the popularity of some "new thing" become very high, than later dissolved without any significant trace. Metaverse even did not achieved any popularity on the wave of first hype. IDK, it is even worse that fidgets (that stupid replacements of regular ball bearing for those who never played with them in childhood). Fidgets at least had some popularity, I remember times when you could see people plaing with them here and there. Now they are gone. Metaverse was gone at the beginning. To the level that Zukerberg himself tried to play in it to invite users somehow. Kind of extreme desperation, I think. Like corporation CEO going from door to door himself trying to sell his crap to somebody.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't see how metaverse crap could be somehow made popular even for a bit. First, you need an overpriced and crappy VR headset, than, what you get is complete crap from all points of view. Any MMORPG like WoW or Minecraft have multiple orders of magnitude more ability to become kind of "reality replacement" and strictly speaking already work that way to some extent. But Metaverse - no way. It is not new, it is too crappy even for VR fans, and it is much worse ergonomically than any other product with similar abilities.

Also, it is definitely not the first time when some big corporation inflate some bubble from some crap just to get rich when it blow.

Another thing - an attempt to pump a lot of third-party money to Zukerberg for some another, but much more important for elites project.

I'll bet on inflating bubble keeping financing hidden project as possibility too. Metaverse as product is absolutely unviable from any possible side, from tech to useability.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

I have no doubts, it is just exactly same pattern. First they infiltrate, then began to flood place with their agenda evading any honest discussion, then use that as a proof of consensus, then demand power and finally ban everybody who don't support their narrative. Observed exactly that thing in every single narrative.

Funny, that those who think all that shit out, somehow can't think further than one step. They think out different narratives, but never bothered to think out different methods of pushing them, not even talking about new methods of dealing with consequences, side effects and so on. Even if goals of pushing different narratives is different, they use single scheme and hope that nobody will notice.

There is no need to confront FE, endlessly trying to prove something to those who inherently will never agree with you. Their behaviour is more that enough to uncover their real intentions.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

You can't discuss your "greatest FE conspiracy" without links to YouTube(!) videos as proofs, can you?

Am I the only one who find that hilarious and ridiculous?

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

So no actual argument, just ad hominem?

Again and again the same. Did you notice, that I didn't discuss your FE at all? The only thing I want to discuss is suspicious behaviour of FErs.

And you just trying to switch the topic. I will not allow you to do that.

Would you please answer my simple question - "Why FErs flood every single hard to find and rare antiglobalist, antiNWO, antielite, antiBigPharma and so on forum, when they have all modern social media to freely discuss their beloved FE theory with their fellows?"

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Im not a flat earth supporter. I believe in freedom of choice.

So, you are perfectly fine with such forum, where people try to track events and figure out what the real game is and how to mitigate future threats will be flooded with "FE", "birds are not real", "numerology", "there are 100500 genders" and so on.

Are you familiar with concept of hygiene? It is a bad idea to cook food in a place flooded with machine oil, clay and wooden chips. That does not mean that all that things are inherently bad, that does mean they are not fit in the place where you try to cook food. So what you propose to do with strangers that insist that they have a right to bring all that stuff to the kitchen, speaking about freedom of choice and so on?

Why FErs somehow insist on their "freedom of choice" but can't sustain others "freedom of choice"?

There are tons of places where FErs could freely discuss their topic without any risk, from Facebook to Metaverse including any popular social platform.

From the ather side, there are very limited amount of places where you could freely discuss topics not welcomed by governments, elites and other groups.

So, what is the need of FErs to forcefully evaluate their "freedom of choice" in all that places, Why regular social media is not enough for them and they exclusively choose forums like that to push their old and boring stuff?

You don't want to discuss that issue too?

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

I recommend watching the "flat earth facts" playlist from taboo conspiracy.

Again? Name me a single statement from that video that didn't circulated in internet in 90s as an obvious science-like joke.

Why you can't produce anything interesting at all by yourself and continue to appeal to lying "experts" from stupid videos?

Meanwhile, why FE videos freely allowed on YouTube and, most importantly - with monetization? You can't monetize even absolutely innocent video with shooting baloon in slowmo, but "hidden" FE - no problem. Is that why you, FEr constantly insist on watching your senseless videos?

Do you have your own thoughts? Why you can't appeal to plain logic and math? Why do you always need some "video" in your posts?

Does enormous amount of videos with coronahoaxer "experts" talking about all their "safe and effective"/"masks and lockdowns works" garbage prove anything?

Just like coronahoaxers you can't have a conversation without appealing to "expert". And just like coronahoaxers you appeal to your own kind of "science", omitting the basic fact about science - it is replicateable. Appealing to "expert" that allegely did some experiment and got some results is not a science at all. Because it could become science only when replicated independently.

Again, instead of admitting that FErs behaviour is exactly same as behaviour of LGBTXYZ+ and woketards, you continue to prove that statement, continueing to push the links to retarded "videos" made by ignorant people who don't even bother to study something to make their "videos" a bit more sane. Seriously, that funny excersises on FE in 90s between those who didn't for a second thougth that FE is something more than a joke, was much more scientific.

You even can't understand, that whole thing is not about FE istelf, it is about behaviour of FErs.

Could you honestly discuss a simple question - "Why FErs always try to push their FE in every single place where people want to discuss something out of narrative? Why did not they explore their FE on their forums among those who interested in it?". Without links to other peoples "videos", without appeals to "experts", without all that crap "go and read about this famous person feeling, how dare you to not believe him!", just using logic - explain that behaviour, right here and right now.

Or you just can't?

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

FE posts could be interesting only in one aspect - how pushing false narratives works.

We will perfectly see following:

  1. No any original thoughts. Only copying "experts" statements.
  2. No any kind of honest discussion.
  3. Complete inability to answer uncomfortable questions.
  4. Cries, insults and shitting when comments are not in favor of FE poster
  5. Complete ignorance or lies about things that used in post as argument (last funniest case was with aviahorizons - FE crowd obviously had absolutely no idea how they really works)

And so on.

Exactly same things and behaviour we literally see every single day done by governments and MSM pushing their agendas on public.

I find a lot of different interesting and controversial conspiracy things on that forum, and no poster behave like FEr. Most are pretty open for discussion, able to accept counterarguments and think out their own explanations and develop or adjust their theory to explain things that does not fit.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Let's not also forget that FE researchers are literally the only conspiracy theorists doing original research.

Except they do something different.

These people will buy lasers that cost thousands of dollars

You don't need a thousand dollar laser to see curvature on large water surface. $100 or less 1W green laser will be more than enough.

Do you understand, that it is a pure lie about "we bought a thousand dollar laser and didn't see curvature"? It is just a plain lie. You will perfectly see curvature with less than $100 laser powerful enough to be seen from a dozen or two kilometers.

Curvature is a problem for any long enough radio and laser data link, when you have to account curvature to order additional mast pieces to put trancievers higher than it should be.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›