-1
cherrywine -1 points ago +2 / -3

So, no?

-1
cherrywine -1 points ago +2 / -3

Do you have something of value to say regarding the point I made or...?

-2
cherrywine -2 points ago +1 / -3

No, you misunderstood. I told you to shut the fuck up.

0
cherrywine 0 points ago +1 / -1

Eustace Mullins said he "copied it from a document." So, your source is "trust me, bro" from a noted liar and propagandist. How come this original document has never been located? How come the larger context of "A Racial Program from the Twentieth Century" has never been published, only this particular quote? How come Eustace Mullins always seems to find himself in sole possession of incredibly overt and damning quotations made by Jews regarding their planned subjugation of the human race?

-1
cherrywine -1 points ago +2 / -3

You should perhaps ask a doctor or nutritionist rather than a forum primarily populated by people who've never spoken to a woman.

0
cherrywine 0 points ago +1 / -1

Dude, I don't care. Save the autistic gibberish routine for someone else.

-1
cherrywine -1 points ago +1 / -2

The purpose of my inverted commas is that you're using "congressional record" as a term that grants the transcription some legitimacy. This hardly matters when the quote being transcribed is a fabrication in the first place. I hardly think you're in a position to question where I place my faith (which is neither what the ADL nor wikipedia writes) when you're the one citing old Stormfront threads. Eustace Mullins all but admitted to writing it himself.

You remain open-minded because you're an antisemite and that's the sort of atmosphere you like to foster around here. Fair enough -- it's "your" forum -- but it all says more about your own biases than the "mystery" of the quote.

-1
cherrywine -1 points ago +2 / -3

What does my response have to do with reddit? Everything I said is true.

0
cherrywine 0 points ago +1 / -1

Non-response, full stop. Sorry you're stupid.

0
cherrywine 0 points ago +1 / -1

The image of the text from the "congressional record" is simply Abernathy's recitation of the Mullins forgery. That doesn't make it any more legit, which I know must be heartbreaking for you.

-2
cherrywine -2 points ago +2 / -4

The criticism is the contribution, little guy. You use words that you don't understand because it makes you feel smart. You didn't know what a "Khazarian" was 6 months ago and you still don't.

-1
cherrywine -1 points ago +1 / -2

You're right, you don't hate Jews. You love them, you're positively obsessed with them. I'd wager that 90% of your posts are about them with little to zero understanding of who or what you're even talking about. It's a shame you don't actually see what an embarrassment you are to some of other well-intentioned people here.

-1
cherrywine -1 points ago +2 / -3

So, this is your painful and exhaustive way of admitting that the quote isn't real? Thanks, anyone with two brain cells already knew that.

-1
cherrywine -1 points ago +3 / -4

Don't you get bored of using words you don't understand? "Khazarian" is as tired as "shill" on this forum.

-3
cherrywine -3 points ago +1 / -4

Fabricated quotes are retrofitted to "line up with everything going today" as a feature, not as coincidence.

-3
cherrywine -3 points ago +2 / -5

Did you know that the notion of a multiplicity of genders is present in many cultures around the world, not just Judaism? India has "hijras", Pilipinos have "baklas", Native Americans have "two-spirits" and so on. Educate yourself before you talk shit.