Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

46
100 year old conspiracy (media.scored.co)
posted 3 years ago by playgoyy 3 years ago by playgoyy +48 / -2
58 comments share
58 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
▲ 0 ▼
– cherrywine 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

The image of the text from the "congressional record" is simply Abernathy's recitation of the Mullins forgery. That doesn't make it any more legit, which I know must be heartbreaking for you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– clemaneuverers 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

"congressional record"

not sure of the purpose of your inverted commas, it is the congressional record for June 7th 1957 ie. what people said in congress, transcribed.

As to legitimacy, you apparently place faith in the legitimacy of what anonymous wikipedia editors and the ADL write, despite a lack of evidence. Me, I remain open-minded - I've not seen anything that certainly confirms who wrote the quote originally or where it came from.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– cherrywine -1 points 3 years ago +1 / -2

The purpose of my inverted commas is that you're using "congressional record" as a term that grants the transcription some legitimacy. This hardly matters when the quote being transcribed is a fabrication in the first place. I hardly think you're in a position to question where I place my faith (which is neither what the ADL nor wikipedia writes) when you're the one citing old Stormfront threads. Eustace Mullins all but admitted to writing it himself.

You remain open-minded because you're an antisemite and that's the sort of atmosphere you like to foster around here. Fair enough -- it's "your" forum -- but it all says more about your own biases than the "mystery" of the quote.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– clemaneuverers 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

grants the transcription some legitimacy

so you doubt the transcription is accurate?

the quote being transcribed is a fabrication

no evidence of this one way or the other. I don't have blind faith in wikipedia or the ADL.

you're the one citing old Stormfront threads

The horror! I also linked wikipedia - absolutely disgusting!

I linked various sources with info about the quote. You've linked nothing, merely expressed opinon.

Eustace Mullins all but admitted to writing it himself.

I don't think anyone disputes he wrote out the quote. It's the origin of the quote that is in doubt. He said he copied it from a document.

you're an antisemite

and you have no argument

but it all says more about your own biases than the "mystery" of the quote.

it is a mystery. give me something that shows with certainty the provenance of the quote. Show me where Mullins owned up to coming up with it entirely on his own. you seem to be taking that for granted.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– cherrywine 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

Eustace Mullins said he "copied it from a document." So, your source is "trust me, bro" from a noted liar and propagandist. How come this original document has never been located? How come the larger context of "A Racial Program from the Twentieth Century" has never been published, only this particular quote? How come Eustace Mullins always seems to find himself in sole possession of incredibly overt and damning quotations made by Jews regarding their planned subjugation of the human race?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy